Department of Clinical Psychology and Experimental Psychopathology, Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
GGZ center for mental health care, Dimence, PO Box 390, Deventer, 7400 AJ, The Netherlands.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Aug 20;24(1):957. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11404-2.
The added value of systematic client feedback (SCF) to psychotherapy can be affected by patient perspectives, both in a positive and negative way, and is influenced by cultural factors as well. Current study explores patients' perspectives on use and optimization of SCF in Dutch outpatient mental healthcare. Primary aim of present study is to generate implications for daily practice and optimize SCF implementation, particularly for the Netherlands.
Four patients suffering from mild to moderate psychological disorders were in-depth interviewed on their perspective on the use of SCF, when the Partners for Change Outcome Management System (PCOMS, high frequent), the Outcome Questionnaire (OQ-45, low frequent) and the Mental Health Continuum Short Form (MHC-SF, low frequent) was added to treatment as usual in two Dutch outpatient mental healthcare centers offering brief psychological treatment. Interview topics were (a) SCF in general; (b) type of questionnaires; (c) frequency of use; (d) effect of SCF on therapy; and (e) perceived added value of SCF. A SCF expert team analyzed the data through reflexive Thematic Analysis.
We identified three themes, all of which have two sub-themes: (a) Requirements to use SCF, with sub-themes (a1) Balance between effort to complete SCF and perceived validity, and (a2) Balance between used frequency and perceived validity; (b) Modifiers for test-taking attitude, with subthemes (b1) SCF as an embedded part of therapy, and (b2) Quality of Therapist-Client alignment; and (c) Effects on therapeutic process, with subthemes (c1) Focus on task and goals, and shared responsibility, and (c2) Effects on outcome and satisfaction.
Adding SCF to therapy can be perceived as helpful by patients in psychotherapy if two conditions are met: (1) Creating a right balance between effort and yield for SCF to be used at all; and (2) embedding SCF as an integral part of therapy, through therapist-client alignment. Throughout the progression of therapy, it might be useful to perceive SCF and therapy as communicating vessels; according to patients it is not only necessary to adjust therapy based on SCF, but also to adjust SCF based on the course of therapy.
This trial was registered on September 30, 2015 in the Dutch Trial Register NTR5466. The Medical Ethics Committee of the University of Twente (Enschede) approved this study (registration number: K15-11, METC Twente).
系统的客户反馈(SCF)对心理治疗的附加值可能会受到患者观点的影响,既有积极的影响,也有消极的影响,并且受到文化因素的影响。本研究探讨了患者对荷兰门诊心理保健中 SCF 的使用和优化的看法。本研究的主要目的是为日常实践提供启示,并优化 SCF 的实施,特别是对荷兰而言。
对 4 名患有轻度至中度心理障碍的患者进行深入访谈,了解他们对使用 SCF 的看法,当 Partners for Change Outcome Management System(PCOMS,高频率)、Outcome Questionnaire(OQ-45,低频率)和 Mental Health Continuum Short Form(MHC-SF,低频率)添加到两个提供简短心理治疗的荷兰门诊心理保健中心的常规治疗中时。访谈主题为:(a)SCF 一般;(b)问卷类型;(c)使用频率;(d)SCF 对治疗的影响;以及(e)SCF 的感知附加值。一个 SCF 专家小组通过反思性主题分析对数据进行了分析。
我们确定了三个主题,每个主题都有两个子主题:(a)使用 SCF 的要求,子主题为(a1)完成 SCF 的努力与感知有效性之间的平衡,以及(a2)使用频率与感知有效性之间的平衡;(b)测试态度的修饰符,子主题为(b1)SCF 作为治疗的一个组成部分,以及(b2)治疗师-患者一致性;以及(c)对治疗过程的影响,子主题为(c1)专注于任务和目标,以及共同责任,以及(c2)对结果和满意度的影响。
如果满足两个条件,患者在心理治疗中添加 SCF 可能会认为这是有帮助的:(1)在使用 SCF 时创造一个努力和收益之间的正确平衡;(2)通过治疗师-患者的一致性,将 SCF 嵌入治疗的一个组成部分。在治疗的整个过程中,将 SCF 和治疗视为沟通的渠道可能会很有用;根据患者的说法,不仅有必要根据 SCF 调整治疗,还需要根据治疗过程调整 SCF。
本试验于 2015 年 9 月 30 日在荷兰试验注册处(NTR5466)注册。特温特大学(恩斯赫德)的医学伦理委员会批准了这项研究(注册号:K15-11,特温特医学伦理委员会)。