Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, UK.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013 Oct;67(10):829-34. doi: 10.1136/jech-2012-202137. Epub 2013 Jul 18.
There is a healthy public policy agenda investigating the health impacts of improving living conditions. However, there are few economic evaluations, to date, assessing value for money. We conducted the first cost-effectiveness analysis of a nationwide intervention transferring social and private tenants to new-build social housing, in Scotland.
A quasi-experimental prospective study was undertaken involving 205 intervention households and 246 comparison households, over 2 years. A cost-utility analysis assessed the average cost per change in health utility (a single score summarising overall health-related quality of life), generated via the SF-6D algorithm. Construction costs for new builds were included. Analysis was conducted for all households, and by family, adult and elderly households; with estimates adjusted for baseline confounders. Outcomes were annuitised and discounted at 3.5%.
The average discounted cost was £18, 708 per household, at a national programme cost of £ 28.4 million. The average change in health utility scores in the intervention group attributable to the intervention were +0.001 for all households, +0.001 for family households, -0.04 for adult households and -0.03 for elderly households. All estimates were statistically insignificant.
At face value, the interventions were not value for money in health terms. However, because the policy rationale was the amenity provision of housing for disadvantaged groups, impacts extend beyond health and may be fully realised over the long term. Before making general value-for-money inferences, economic evaluation should attempt to estimate the full social value of interventions, model long-term impacts and explicitly incorporate equity considerations.
改善生活条件对健康的影响是公共政策议程中的一个重要议题。然而,迄今为止,评估成本效益的经济评估很少。我们在苏格兰进行了首次全国性干预措施的成本效益分析,该干预措施将社会和私人租户转移到新的社会住房中。
进行了一项准实验前瞻性研究,涉及 205 个干预家庭和 246 个对照家庭,为期 2 年。使用 SF-6D 算法评估健康效用变化的平均成本(一个综合整体健康相关生活质量的单一评分)进行成本效用分析。包括新建建筑的建设成本。对所有家庭以及家庭、成年和老年家庭进行了分析;并根据基线混杂因素对估计值进行了调整。结果按年金和贴现率 3.5%计算。
每个家庭的平均贴现成本为 18708 英镑,全国项目成本为 2840 万英镑。干预组家庭健康效用评分的平均变化归因于干预措施为+0.001,家庭家庭为+0.001,成年家庭为-0.04,老年家庭为-0.03。所有估计均无统计学意义。
从表面上看,这些干预措施在健康方面没有物有所值。然而,由于政策的基本原理是为弱势群体提供住房福利,因此影响超出了健康范围,并可能在长期内得到充分实现。在做出一般的物有所值推断之前,经济评估应尝试估计干预措施的全部社会价值,对长期影响进行建模,并明确纳入公平性考虑因素。