Beckman Linda, Svensson Mikael, Frisén Ann
Department of Public Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Department of Public Health, Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden.
Qual Life Res. 2016 Feb;25(2):303-309. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1101-9. Epub 2015 Aug 14.
No previous study has estimated the association between bullying and preference-based health-related quality of life (HRQoL) ("utility"), knowledge of which may be used for cost-effectiveness studies of interventions designed to prevent bullying. Therefore, the aim of the study was to estimate preference-based HRQoL among victims of bullying compared to non-victims.
A cross-sectional survey data collection among Swedish adolescents aged 15-17 years in the first year of upper secondary school was conducted in the city of Gothenburg in Sweden (N = 758). Preference-based HRQoL was estimated with the SF-6D. Regression analyses were conducted to adjust for some individual-level background variable.
Mean preference-based health-related quality of life scores were 0.77 and 0.71 for non-victims and victims of bullying, respectively. The difference of 0.06 points was statistically significant (p < 0.05) and robust to inclusion of gender, age, and parental immigrant status.
The preference-based HRQoL estimates in this study may be used as an upper bound in economic evaluations of bullying prevention interventions, facilitating a comparison between costs and quality-adjusted life-years.
以往尚无研究评估欺凌与基于偏好的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)(“效用”)之间的关联,了解这一关联可用于针对预防欺凌干预措施的成本效益研究。因此,本研究的目的是评估欺凌受害者与非受害者相比基于偏好的HRQoL。
在瑞典哥德堡市对15至17岁的瑞典青少年进行了一项横断面调查数据收集,这些青少年处于高中一年级(N = 758)。使用SF - 6D评估基于偏好的HRQoL。进行回归分析以调整一些个体层面的背景变量。
非受害者和欺凌受害者基于偏好的健康相关生活质量平均得分分别为0.77和0.71。0.06分的差异具有统计学意义(p < 0.05),并且在纳入性别、年龄和父母移民身份后仍然稳健。
本研究中基于偏好的HRQoL估计值可作为欺凌预防干预措施经济评估的上限,有助于比较成本与质量调整生命年。