• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种有助于选择需要再次剖腹手术的腹部脓毒症患者的决策规则。

A decision rule to aid selection of patients with abdominal sepsis requiring a relaparotomy.

作者信息

Kiewiet Jordy J S, van Ruler Oddeke, Boermeester Marja A, Reitsma Johannes B

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam 1105 AZ, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Surg. 2013 Jul 19;13:28. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-13-28.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2482-13-28
PMID:23870702
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3750491/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Accurate and timely identification of patients in need of a relaparotomy is challenging since there are no readily available strongholds. The aim of this study is to develop a prediction model to aid the decision-making process in whom to perform a relaparotomy.

METHODS

Data from a randomized trial comparing surgical strategies for relaparotomy were used. Variables were selected based on previous reports and common clinical sense and screened in a univariable regression analysis to identify those associated with the need for relaparotomy. Variables with the strongest association were considered for the prediction model which was constructed after backward elimination in a multivariable regression analysis. The discriminatory capacity of the model was expressed with the area under the curve (AUC). A cut-off analysis was performed to illustrate the consequences in clinical practice.

RESULTS

One hundred and eighty-two patients were included; 46 were considered cases requiring a relaparotomy. A prediction model was build containing 6 variables. This final model had an AUC of 0.80 indicating good discriminatory capacity. However, acceptable sensitivity would require a low threshold for relaparotomy leading to an unacceptable rate of negative relaparotomies (63%). Therefore, the prediction model was incorporated in a decision rule were the interval until re-assessment and the use of Computed Tomography are related to the outcome of the model.

CONCLUSIONS

To construct a prediction model that will provide a definite answer whether or not to perform a relaparotomy seems a utopia. However, our prediction model can be used to stratify patients on their underlying risk and could guide further monitoring of patients with abdominal sepsis in order to identify patients with suspected ongoing peritonitis in a timely fashion.

摘要

背景

由于缺乏现成的可靠依据,准确及时地识别需要再次剖腹手术的患者具有挑战性。本研究的目的是开发一种预测模型,以辅助决定对哪些患者进行再次剖腹手术。

方法

使用一项比较再次剖腹手术手术策略的随机试验数据。根据先前的报告和一般临床常识选择变量,并在单变量回归分析中进行筛选,以确定那些与再次剖腹手术需求相关的变量。在多变量回归分析中通过向后消除法构建预测模型时,考虑关联性最强的变量。模型的鉴别能力用曲线下面积(AUC)表示。进行了截断分析以说明在临床实践中的后果。

结果

纳入了182例患者;46例被视为需要再次剖腹手术的病例。构建了一个包含6个变量的预测模型。该最终模型的AUC为0.80,表明具有良好的鉴别能力。然而,要获得可接受的敏感性,需要对再次剖腹手术设定较低的阈值,这会导致不可接受的阴性再次剖腹手术率(63%)。因此,将预测模型纳入了一个决策规则,其中再次评估的间隔时间和计算机断层扫描的使用与模型的结果相关。

结论

构建一个能明确回答是否进行再次剖腹手术的预测模型似乎是不切实际的。然而,我们的预测模型可用于根据患者的潜在风险进行分层,并可指导对腹部脓毒症患者的进一步监测,以便及时识别疑似持续性腹膜炎的患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e6b/3750491/865b3b903501/1471-2482-13-28-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e6b/3750491/115c77234df2/1471-2482-13-28-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e6b/3750491/e64a13dbcaa1/1471-2482-13-28-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e6b/3750491/865b3b903501/1471-2482-13-28-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e6b/3750491/115c77234df2/1471-2482-13-28-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e6b/3750491/e64a13dbcaa1/1471-2482-13-28-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e6b/3750491/865b3b903501/1471-2482-13-28-3.jpg

相似文献

1
A decision rule to aid selection of patients with abdominal sepsis requiring a relaparotomy.一种有助于选择需要再次剖腹手术的腹部脓毒症患者的决策规则。
BMC Surg. 2013 Jul 19;13:28. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-13-28.
2
Variables associated with positive findings at relaparotomy in patients with secondary peritonitis.继发性腹膜炎患者再次剖腹探查时与阳性发现相关的变量。
Crit Care Med. 2007 Feb;35(2):468-76. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000253399.03545.2D.
3
Failure of available scoring systems to predict ongoing infection in patients with abdominal sepsis after their initial emergency laparotomy.现有评分系统无法预测腹部脓毒症患者初次急诊剖腹术后的持续性感染情况。
BMC Surg. 2011 Dec 23;11:38. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-11-38.
4
Relaparotomy for suspected intraperitoneal sepsis after abdominal surgery.腹部手术后因怀疑腹腔内感染而行再次剖腹手术。
World J Surg. 2004 Feb;28(2):137-41. doi: 10.1007/s00268-003-7067-8. Epub 2004 Jan 8.
5
Relaparotomy in peritonitis: prognosis and treatment of patients with persisting intraabdominal infection.腹膜炎再次剖腹探查术:持续性腹腔内感染患者的预后与治疗
World J Surg. 2000 Jan;24(1):32-7. doi: 10.1007/s002689910007.
6
Clinical predictors of ongoing infection in secondary peritonitis: systematic review.继发性腹膜炎持续感染的临床预测因素:系统评价
World J Surg. 2006 Dec;30(12):2170-81. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-0333-1.
7
Re-operation for complicated secondary peritonitis - how to identify patients at risk for persistent sepsis.复杂性继发性腹膜炎的再次手术——如何识别有持续性脓毒症风险的患者。
Eur J Med Res. 2003 Mar 27;8(3):125-34.
8
Application of the Kiewiet-Van Ruler model to predict the need for relaparotomy in patients with secondary peritonitis.应用基维特-范鲁勒模型预测继发性腹膜炎患者再次剖腹手术的必要性。
Cir Cir. 2019;87(2):158-163. doi: 10.24875/CIRU.18000284.
9
Comparison of on-demand vs planned relaparotomy strategy in patients with severe peritonitis: a randomized trial.重症腹膜炎患者按需再次剖腹手术与计划性再次剖腹手术策略的比较:一项随机试验
JAMA. 2007 Aug 22;298(8):865-72. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.8.865.
10
Early elevation of intra-abdominal pressure after laparotomy for secondary peritonitis: a predictor of relaparotomy?继发性腹膜炎剖腹手术后腹腔内压力早期升高:再次剖腹手术的预测指标?
World J Surg. 2008 Aug;32(8):1851-6. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9605-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Functional Characterization of Neutrophils Allows Source Control Evaluation in a Murine Sepsis Model.中性粒细胞功能特征分析可用于评估小鼠脓毒症模型中的源头控制。
J Surg Res. 2022 Jun;274:94-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.12.037. Epub 2022 Feb 5.
2
Novel method for delayed primary closure and incisional hernia prevention in open abdomen: COmbined and MOdified Definitive Abdominal wall closure (COMODA).新型开放腹部延迟一期缝合及切口疝预防方法:联合改良确定性腹壁关闭术(COMODA)。
Hernia. 2020 Apr;24(2):395-401. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01948-2. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
3
The impact of standardized protocol implementation for surgical damage control and temporary abdominal closure after emergent laparotomy.

本文引用的文献

1
Failure of available scoring systems to predict ongoing infection in patients with abdominal sepsis after their initial emergency laparotomy.现有评分系统无法预测腹部脓毒症患者初次急诊剖腹术后的持续性感染情况。
BMC Surg. 2011 Dec 23;11:38. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-11-38.
2
Dealing with missing predictor values when applying clinical prediction models.应用临床预测模型时处理预测变量缺失值的问题。
Clin Chem. 2009 May;55(5):994-1001. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2008.115345. Epub 2009 Mar 12.
3
Surgical approaches to peritonitis.腹膜炎的手术治疗方法。
实施标准化方案对剖腹术后外科损伤控制和临时腹部关闭的影响。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 Apr;86(4):670-678. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002170.
4
Surgical treatment of secondary peritonitis : A continuing problem.继发性腹膜炎的外科治疗:一个持续存在的问题。
Chirurg. 2017 Jan;88(Suppl 1):1-6. doi: 10.1007/s00104-015-0121-x.
5
[Surgical treatment of secondary peritonitis: A continuing problem. German version].继发性腹膜炎的外科治疗:一个持续存在的问题。[德文版]
Chirurg. 2016 Jan;87(1):13-9. doi: 10.1007/s00104-015-0115-8.
6
[Therapy concepts for diffuse peritonitis: When laparoscopic lavage and when open abdomen?].[弥漫性腹膜炎的治疗理念:何时采用腹腔镜灌洗,何时采用开放腹腔?]
Chirurg. 2016 Jan;87(1):34-9. doi: 10.1007/s00104-015-0104-y.
7
The role of the open abdomen procedure in managing severe abdominal sepsis: WSES position paper.开放腹腔手术在处理严重腹部脓毒症中的作用:世界急诊外科学会立场文件
World J Emerg Surg. 2015 Aug 12;10:35. doi: 10.1186/s13017-015-0032-7. eCollection 2015.
Br J Surg. 2007 Nov;94(11):1317-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6041.
4
Comparison of on-demand vs planned relaparotomy strategy in patients with severe peritonitis: a randomized trial.重症腹膜炎患者按需再次剖腹手术与计划性再次剖腹手术策略的比较:一项随机试验
JAMA. 2007 Aug 22;298(8):865-72. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.8.865.
5
Variables associated with positive findings at relaparotomy in patients with secondary peritonitis.继发性腹膜炎患者再次剖腹探查时与阳性发现相关的变量。
Crit Care Med. 2007 Feb;35(2):468-76. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000253399.03545.2D.
6
Clinical predictors of ongoing infection in secondary peritonitis: systematic review.继发性腹膜炎持续感染的临床预测因素:系统评价
World J Surg. 2006 Dec;30(12):2170-81. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-0333-1.
7
Using the outcome for imputation of missing predictor values was preferred.使用结果来插补缺失的预测变量值是更可取的。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Oct;59(10):1092-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.01.009. Epub 2006 Jun 19.
8
Risk factors for severe sepsis in secondary peritonitis.继发性腹膜炎中严重脓毒症的危险因素。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2003 Winter;4(4):355-62. doi: 10.1089/109629603322761418.
9
The continuing challenge of intra-abdominal infection.腹腔内感染的持续挑战。
Am J Surg. 2003 Nov 28;186(5A):15S-22S; discussion 31S-34S. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.10.003.
10
Intensive care unit management of intra-abdominal infection.重症监护病房对腹腔内感染的管理。
Crit Care Med. 2003 Aug;31(8):2228-37. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000087326.59341.51.