• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国妇产科医师学会实践通报:确定其引文、影响力和利用率。

American college of obstetricians and gynecologists practice bulletins: ascertaining their citation, influence, and utilization.

机构信息

Center for Urban Population Health, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Aurora University of Wisconsin Medical Group, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

出版信息

Am J Perinatol. 2014 May;31(5):373-82. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1349895. Epub 2013 Jul 19.

DOI:10.1055/s-0033-1349895
PMID:23873115
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To ascertain the influence and utilization of the American College Obstetricians and Gynecologists practice bulletins (PBs) by measuring their citations in three different search tools.

STUDY DESIGN

PBs in obstetrics (OB-PBs) and gynecology (GYN-PBs) published from September 1998 to December 2009 were identified. PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and Web of Science were utilized to determine how often PBs were cited. The citations were quantified by three parameters, most citations, highest citation rate, and highest impact factor.

RESULTS

The OB-PB with the most citations (125) was PB no. 33 (Diagnosis and Management of Preeclampsia and Eclampsia), highest citation rate (44) was PB no. 101 (Ultrasonography in Pregnancy), highest OBGYN impact factor (4.39) was PB no. 71 (Episiotomy), and highest non-OBGYN impact factor (53.49) was PB no. 38 (Perinatal Care at Threshold of Viability). The GYN-PB with the highest citation rate (103) was PB no. 109 (Cervical Cytology Screening), highest OBGYN impact factor (3.85) was PB no. 103 (Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome), and highest non-OBGYN impact factor (20.89) was PB no. 35 (Cervical Carcinoma).

CONCLUSIONS

No one PB had the most citations, highest citation rate, and highest impact factor.

摘要

目的

通过在三种不同的检索工具中测量其引用率,确定美国妇产科医师学会实践通报(PBs)的影响和利用率。

研究设计

确定了 1998 年 9 月至 2009 年 12 月期间发表的妇产科 PB(OB-PB)和妇科 PB(GYN-PB)。利用 PubMed、Ovid MEDLINE 和 Web of Science 确定 PB 被引用的频率。通过三个参数来量化引用率:引用次数最多、最高引用率和最高影响因子。

结果

引用次数最多的 OB-PB(125)是 PB 33 号(子痫前期和子痫的诊断和处理),最高引用率(44)是 PB 101 号(妊娠超声检查),最高妇产科影响因子(4.39)是 PB 71 号(会阴切开术),最高非妇产科影响因子(53.49)是 PB 38 号(围产儿生存边缘的围产期护理)。引用率最高的 GYN-PB(103)是 PB 109 号(宫颈细胞学筛查),最高妇产科影响因子(3.85)是 PB 103 号(遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌综合征),最高非妇产科影响因子(20.89)是 PB 35 号(宫颈癌)。

结论

没有一个 PB 同时具有最多的引用次数、最高的引用率和最高的影响因子。

相似文献

1
American college of obstetricians and gynecologists practice bulletins: ascertaining their citation, influence, and utilization.美国妇产科医师学会实践通报:确定其引文、影响力和利用率。
Am J Perinatol. 2014 May;31(5):373-82. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1349895. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
2
A Bibliometric Analysis of Top-Cited Journal Articles in Obstetrics and Gynecology.妇产科高被引期刊文章的文献计量学分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Dec 2;2(12):e1918007. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18007.
3
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists practice bulletins: an overview.美国妇产科医师学会实践公告:概述
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jun;194(6):1564-72; discussion 1072-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.03.001.
4
False Alarms, Pseudoepidemics, and Reality: A Case Study with American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Practice Bulletins.误报、假流行与现实:以美国妇产科医师学会实践公告为例的案例研究
Am J Perinatol. 2016 Apr;33(5):442-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1566247. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
5
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Practice Bulletins: original versus revised.美国妇产科医师学会实践通报:原始版本与修订版本。
Am J Perinatol. 2010 Sep;27(8):611-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1249363. Epub 2010 Mar 1.
6
Comparison of two national guidelines in obstetrics: American versus royal college of obstetricians and gynecologists.比较两份产科国家指南:美国与皇家妇产科学院。
Am J Perinatol. 2010 Nov;27(10):763-70. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1253554. Epub 2010 Apr 20.
7
Knowledge gap of recommendations in ACOG practice bulletins: a survey of members of the Central Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.ACOG 实践通报推荐知识差距:中产科医师协会成员调查。
J Perinat Med. 2012 Jun;40(4):403-12. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2012-0022.
8
Obstetric Recommendations in American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Practice Bulletins versus UpToDate: a comparison.美国妇产科医师学会实践公告与UpToDate中的产科建议比较
Am J Perinatol. 2015 Apr;32(5):427-44. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1396684. Epub 2014 Dec 29.
9
Conflicting and changing breast cancer screening recommendations: survey study of a national sample of ob-gyns after the release of the 2009 USPSTF guidelines.相互冲突且不断变化的乳腺癌筛查建议:2009年美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)指南发布后对全国妇产科医生样本的调查研究
J Healthc Qual. 2013 Jul-Aug;35(4):25-35. doi: 10.1111/jhq.12009. Epub 2013 Apr 16.
10
Scientific evidence underlying the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' practice bulletins.美国妇产科医师学会实践通报的科学依据。
Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Sep;118(3):505-512. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182267f43.