Doğan Canan, Bilaçeroğlu Semra, Çirak Ali Kadri, Özsöz Ayşe, Özbek Defne
Clinic of Chest Diseases, Dr. Suat Seren Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.
Tuberk Toraks. 2013;61(2):103-9. doi: 10.5578/tt.5334.
To determine the diagnostic value of pleural fluid procalcitonin (PF-PCT) and serum PCT (S-PCT) levels in the diagnosis of parapneumonic pleural effusion (PPPE).
Sixty five inpatients with exudative pleural fluid were consecutively included in this prospective study. Biochemical (total protein, albumin, LDH, glucose, pH, PCT) studies were performed in concurrently obtained pleural fluid and venous blood samples, cytologic and microbiologic (acid-fast bacillus smear/culture, nonspecific bacterial Gram stain/culture, fungal culture) studies were performed in pleural fluid. The patients were grouped as PPPE (n= 33) and non-PPPE (n= 32) after the diagnoses were definitely established.
A total of 65 patients (M/F: 38/27; age: 57.53 ± 18.46 years) with exudative pleural fluids were assessed. In the 33 with PPPEs, 6 simple PPPEs, 5 complicated PPPEs and 22 empyemas were determined whereas in the 32 non-PPPEs, 9 tuberculous, 10 malignant, 6 paramalignant, 5 non-specific effusions and 2 chylothoraces were determined. Compared with the non-PPPE group, more fever, pneumonic infiltrations and fluid loculation, higher sedimentation, leukocyte, fluid LDH besides lower fluid glucose, pH, albumin and protein together with lower serum LDH were determined in the PPPE group (p< 0.05). Higher PS-PCT (1.03 ± 1.27 vs. 0.06 ± 0.06 ng/mL) and S-PCT levels (0.90 ± 1.44 vs. 0.05 ± 0.02 ng/mL) were determined in the PPPE group (p= 0.000). In the PPPE group, PS-PCT and S-PCT showed positive correlation with each other while PS-PCT did with sedimentation, leukocyte, CURB-65 and serum LDH, and S-PCT did with sedimentation, CURB-65 and duration of hospitalization. ROC curve, a specificity of 96.9% and a sensitivity of 57.5% were determined for an optimal PS-PCT cut-off level (0.285 ng/mL), and a specificity of %96.9 and a sensitivity of %66.6 for an optimal S-PCT cut-off level (0.105 ng/mL) that could differentiate PPPE.
PS/S-PCT levels were found to be highly efficient in excluding PPPE but not sufficiently reliable in the diagnosis of it. However, these findings should be reassessed in a larger group of cases that have not been given any antibiotic/anti-inflammatory treatment.
确定胸腔积液降钙素原(PF-PCT)和血清降钙素原(S-PCT)水平在诊断类肺炎性胸腔积液(PPPE)中的诊断价值。
本前瞻性研究连续纳入65例渗出性胸腔积液住院患者。同时采集胸腔积液和静脉血样本进行生化(总蛋白、白蛋白、乳酸脱氢酶、葡萄糖、pH值、降钙素原)检测,对胸腔积液进行细胞学和微生物学(抗酸杆菌涂片/培养、非特异性细菌革兰氏染色/培养、真菌培养)检测。在明确诊断后,将患者分为PPPE组(n = 33)和非PPPE组(n = 32)。
共评估了65例渗出性胸腔积液患者(男/女:38/27;年龄:57.53±18.46岁)。在33例PPPE患者中,确定有6例单纯PPPE、5例复杂性PPPE和22例脓胸;而在32例非PPPE患者中,确定有9例结核性、10例恶性、6例类恶性、5例非特异性积液和2例乳糜胸。与非PPPE组相比,PPPE组有更多发热、肺部浸润和液性包裹,更高的血沉、白细胞、胸腔积液乳酸脱氢酶,同时更低的胸腔积液葡萄糖、pH值、白蛋白和蛋白以及更低的血清乳酸脱氢酶(p<0.05)。PPPE组的PS-PCT(1.03±1.27 vs. 0.06±0.06 ng/mL)和S-PCT水平(0.90±1.44 vs. 0.05±0.02 ng/mL)更高(p = 0.000)。在PPPE组中,PS-PCT和S-PCT相互呈正相关,而PS-PCT与血沉、白细胞、CURB-65和血清乳酸脱氢酶呈正相关,S-PCT与血沉、CURB-65和住院时间呈正相关。ROC曲线显示,对于区分PPPE的最佳PS-PCT临界值水平(0.285 ng/mL),特异性为96.9%,敏感性为57.5%;对于最佳S-PCT临界值水平(0.105 ng/mL),特异性为96.9%,敏感性为66.6%。
发现PS/S-PCT水平在排除PPPE方面高效,但在诊断PPPE方面不够可靠。然而,这些发现应在未接受任何抗生素/抗炎治疗的更大病例组中重新评估。