• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用德尔菲共识方法制定了评估水疗和浴疗试验报告质量的清单:SPAC 清单。

A checklist to assess the quality of reports on spa therapy and balneotherapy trials was developed using the Delphi consensus method: the SPAC checklist.

机构信息

Faculty of Regional Environment Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Japan.

出版信息

Complement Ther Med. 2013 Aug;21(4):324-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2013.05.002. Epub 2013 Jun 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.ctim.2013.05.002
PMID:23876563
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to develop a checklist of items that describes and measures the quality of reports of interventional trials assessing spa therapy.

METHODS

The Delphi consensus method was used to select the number of items in the checklist. A total of eight individuals participated, including an epidemiologist, a clinical research methodologist, clinical researchers, a medical journalist, and a health fitness programmer. Participants ranked on a 9-point Likert scale whether an item should be included in the checklist.

RESULTS

Three rounds of the Delphi method were conducted to achieve consensus. The final checklist contained 19 items, with items related to title, place of implementation (specificity of spa), care provider influence, and additional measures to minimize the potential bias from withdrawals, loss to follow-up, and low treatment adherence.

CONCLUSION

This checklist is simple and quick to complete, and should help clinicians and researchers critically appraise the medical and healthcare literature, reviewers assess the quality of reports included in systematic reviews, and researchers plan interventional trials of spa therapy.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在制定一份清单,描述和衡量评估矿泉疗法的干预试验报告的质量。

方法

采用德尔菲共识法选择清单中的项目数量。共有 8 人参与,包括一名流行病学家、一名临床研究方法学家、临床研究人员、一名医学记者和一名健康健身程序员。参与者对项目是否应包含在清单中进行了 9 分李克特量表评分。

结果

经过三轮德尔菲法,达成了共识。最终的清单包含 19 个项目,涉及标题、实施地点(矿泉的特异性)、护理提供者的影响以及其他措施,以最大限度地减少因退出、失访和治疗依从性低而导致的潜在偏倚。

结论

本清单简单快捷,应有助于临床医生和研究人员批判性地评估医学和医疗保健文献,审查者评估系统评价中报告的质量,以及研究人员计划矿泉疗法的干预试验。

相似文献

1
A checklist to assess the quality of reports on spa therapy and balneotherapy trials was developed using the Delphi consensus method: the SPAC checklist.采用德尔菲共识方法制定了评估水疗和浴疗试验报告质量的清单:SPAC 清单。
Complement Ther Med. 2013 Aug;21(4):324-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2013.05.002. Epub 2013 Jun 7.
2
A checklist to evaluate a report of a nonpharmacological trial (CLEAR NPT) was developed using consensus.通过达成共识制定了一份用于评估非药物试验报告的清单(CLEAR NPT)。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Dec;58(12):1233-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.05.004. Epub 2005 Oct 13.
3
Assessing the quality of study reports on spa therapy based on randomized controlled trials by the spa therapy checklist (SPAC).使用水疗疗法检查表(SPAC)基于随机对照试验评估水疗疗法研究报告的质量。
Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2014 Nov;20(4):317-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2014.08.001. Epub 2014 Aug 20.
4
A reporting guideline for clinical platelet transfusion studies from the BEST Collaborative.BEST 协作组临床血小板输注研究报告指南。
Transfusion. 2013 Jun;53(6):1328-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03906.x. Epub 2012 Sep 25.
5
Cross-cultural adaptation of the spa therapy checklist (SPAC) in Greek.希腊语版温泉疗法检查表(SPAC)的跨文化适应性研究
Int J Biometeorol. 2023 Feb;67(2):299-309. doi: 10.1007/s00484-022-02406-y. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
6
Rating the methodological quality of single-subject designs and n-of-1 trials: introducing the Single-Case Experimental Design (SCED) Scale.评估单病例设计和n-of-1试验的方法学质量:介绍单病例实验设计(SCED)量表。
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2008 Aug;18(4):385-401. doi: 10.1080/09602010802009201.
7
Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT): Modified Delphi Study.运动报告模板共识(CERT):改良德尔菲研究
Phys Ther. 2016 Oct;96(10):1514-1524. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20150668. Epub 2016 May 5.
8
Quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials of herbal medicine interventions.草药干预随机对照试验的报告质量。
Am J Med. 2006 Sep;119(9):800.e1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.02.006.
9
Reproducibility of the STARD checklist: an instrument to assess the quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies.STARD 清单的可重复性:一种评估诊断准确性研究报告质量的工具。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 Mar 15;6:12. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-6-12.
10
Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. QUOROM Group.提高随机对照试验的Meta分析报告质量:QUOROM声明。QUOROM小组。
Br J Surg. 2000 Nov;87(11):1448-54. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01610.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Sulphurous mud-bath therapy for treatment of chronic low back pain caused by lumbar spine osteoarthritis.硫磺泥浴疗法治疗腰椎骨关节炎引起的慢性下腰痛。
Intern Emerg Med. 2019 Jan;14(1):187-190. doi: 10.1007/s11739-018-1967-y. Epub 2018 Oct 13.
2
Health resort medicine in non-musculoskeletal disorders: is there evidence of its effectiveness?非肌肉骨骼疾病中的健康疗养医学:有其有效性的证据吗?
Int J Biometeorol. 2015 Oct;59(10):1523-44. doi: 10.1007/s00484-015-0953-6. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
3
Effectiveness of balneotherapy and spa therapy for the treatment of chronic low back pain: a review on latest evidence.
温泉疗法和水疗对慢性下腰痛的治疗效果:最新证据综述
Clin Rheumatol. 2015 Feb;34(2):207-14. doi: 10.1007/s10067-014-2845-2. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
4
Effectiveness of music therapy: a summary of systematic reviews based on randomized controlled trials of music interventions.音乐疗法的有效性:基于音乐干预随机对照试验的系统评价综述
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2014 May 16;8:727-54. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S61340. eCollection 2014.