Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, 13400 E. Shea Boulevard, Scottsdale, AZ 85259(∗).
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Hospital, Phoenix, AZ(†).
PM R. 2013 Dec;5(12):1019-25. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2013.07.001. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
To investigate reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) in individuals affected by stroke. The secondary objective was to test the validity and sensitivity of a single-item linear analog scale (LAS) of function.
Prospective cohort reliability and validation study.
A single rehabilitation department in an academic medical center.
Forty-three individuals receiving neurorehabilitation for lower extremity dysfunction after stroke were studied. Their ages ranged from 32 to 95 years, with a mean of 70 years; 77% were men.
Test-retest reliability was assessed by calculating the classical intraclass correlation coefficient, and the Bland-Altman limits of agreement. Validity was assessed by calculating the Pearson correlation coefficient between the instruments. Sensitivity to change was assessed by comparing baseline scores with end of treatment scores. Measurements were taken at baseline, after 1-3 days, and at 4 and 8 weeks.
The LEFS, Short-Form-36 Physical Function Scale, Berg Balance Scale, Six-Minute Walk Test, Five-Meter Walk Test, Timed Up-and-Go test, and the LAS of function were used.
The test-retest reliability of the LEFS was found to be excellent (ICC = 0.96). Correlated with the 6 other measures of function studied, the validity of the LEFS was found to be moderate to high (r = 0.40-0.71). Regarding the sensitivity to change, the mean LEFS scores from baseline to study end increased 1.2 SD and for LAS 1.1 SD.
LEFS exhibits good reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change in patients with lower extremity impairments secondary to stroke. Therefore, the LEFS can be a clinically efficient outcome measure in the rehabilitation of patients with subacute stroke. The LAS is shown to be a time-saving and reasonable option to track changes in a patient's functional status.
调查下肢功能量表(LEFS)在脑卒中患者中的可靠性、有效性和变化敏感性。次要目标是测试功能单项线性模拟量表(LAS)的有效性和敏感性。
前瞻性队列可靠性和验证研究。
学术医疗中心的单一康复科。
43 名因下肢功能障碍接受神经康复治疗的脑卒中患者。他们的年龄在 32 至 95 岁之间,平均年龄为 70 岁;77%为男性。
通过计算经典的组内相关系数和 Bland-Altman 一致性界限来评估测试-再测试可靠性。通过计算仪器之间的 Pearson 相关系数来评估有效性。通过比较基线评分和治疗结束时的评分来评估变化的敏感性。测量在基线时、治疗后 1-3 天以及 4 周和 8 周时进行。
使用 LEFS、短格式 36 项健康状况调查量表物理功能量表、伯格平衡量表、六分钟步行测试、五米步行测试、起立行走测试和功能 LAS。
LEFS 的测试-再测试可靠性被发现是极好的(ICC=0.96)。与研究中其他 6 项功能测量相关,LEFS 的有效性被发现是中度到高度相关(r=0.40-0.71)。关于变化的敏感性,从基线到研究结束时,LEFS 的平均评分增加了 1.2 个标准差,而 LAS 则增加了 1.1 个标准差。
LEFS 在下肢功能受损的脑卒中患者中表现出良好的可靠性、有效性和变化敏感性。因此,LEFS 可以成为康复治疗亚急性脑卒中患者的一种临床有效的测量方法。LAS 被证明是一种节省时间和合理的选择,可以跟踪患者功能状态的变化。