• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Cost per responder of TNF-α therapies in Germany.德国 TNF-α 治疗的应答者成本。
Clin Rheumatol. 2013 Dec;32(12):1805-9. doi: 10.1007/s10067-013-2332-1. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
2
A systematic review of the effectiveness of adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in adults and an economic evaluation of their cost-effectiveness.阿达木单抗、依那西普和英夫利昔单抗治疗成人类风湿关节炎有效性的系统评价及其成本效益的经济学评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Nov;10(42):iii-iv, xi-xiii, 1-229. doi: 10.3310/hta10420.
3
Review of eight pharmacoeconomic studies of the value of biologic DMARDs (adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab) in the management of rheumatoid arthritis.关于生物性改善病情抗风湿药(阿达木单抗、依那西普和英夫利昔单抗)在类风湿关节炎治疗中价值的八项药物经济学研究综述。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2006 Sep;12(7):555-69. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2006.12.7.555.
4
Cost-effectiveness of TNF-alpha-blocking agents in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.肿瘤坏死因子-α阻断剂治疗类风湿关节炎的成本效益
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2004 Sep;5(9):1881-6. doi: 10.1517/14656566.5.9.1881.
5
Adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, rituximab and abatacept for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis after the failure of a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor: a systematic review and economic evaluation.阿达木单抗、依那西普、英夫利昔单抗、利妥昔单抗和阿巴西普治疗肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂治疗失败后的类风湿关节炎:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 Mar;15(14):1-278. doi: 10.3310/hta15140.
6
A cost-cost study comparing etanercept with infliximab in rheumatoid arthritis.一项比较依那西普和英夫利昔单抗治疗类风湿关节炎的成本-成本研究。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2001;19(10):1051-64. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200119100-00006.
7
Matching-adjusted indirect comparison of adalimumab vs etanercept and infliximab for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis.阿达木单抗、依那西普和英夫利昔单抗治疗银屑病关节炎的匹配调整间接比较。
J Med Econ. 2013;16(4):479-89. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2013.768530. Epub 2013 Feb 7.
8
Adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic review and economic evaluation.阿达木单抗、依那西普和英夫利昔单抗治疗强直性脊柱炎:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Aug;11(28):1-158, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta11280.
9
Differences in annual medication costs and rates of dosage increase between tumor necrosis factor-antagonist therapies for rheumatoid arthritis in a managed care population.在管理式医疗人群中,类风湿关节炎肿瘤坏死因子拮抗剂疗法的年度用药成本及剂量增加率的差异。
Clin Ther. 2009 Apr;31(4):825-35. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.04.002.
10
Cost utility of tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors for rheumatoid arthritis: an application of Bayesian methods for evidence synthesis in a Markov model.肿瘤坏死因子-α抑制剂治疗类风湿关节炎的成本效用:贝叶斯方法在马尔可夫模型中证据综合的应用。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2012 Jul 1;30(7):575-93. doi: 10.2165/11594990-000000000-00000.

引用本文的文献

1
The Budget Impact of Biosimilar Infliximab (Remsima®) for the Treatment of Autoimmune Diseases in Five European Countries.生物类似药英夫利昔单抗(Remsima®)治疗欧洲五国自身免疫性疾病的预算影响
Adv Ther. 2015 Aug;32(8):742-56. doi: 10.1007/s12325-015-0233-1. Epub 2015 Sep 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Adalimumab added to a treat-to-target strategy with methotrexate and intra-articular triamcinolone in early rheumatoid arthritis increased remission rates, function and quality of life. The OPERA Study: an investigator-initiated, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial.阿达木单抗联合甲氨蝶呤和关节内曲安奈德治疗早期类风湿关节炎的靶向治疗策略可提高缓解率、功能和生活质量。OPERA 研究:一项由研究者发起的、随机、双盲、平行分组、安慰剂对照试验。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Apr;73(4):654-61. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202735. Epub 2013 Feb 23.
2
[German 2012 guidelines for the sequential medical treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Adapted EULAR recommendations and updated treatment algorithm].[德国2012年类风湿关节炎序贯药物治疗指南。欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)改编建议及更新的治疗算法]
Z Rheumatol. 2012 Sep;71(7):592-603. doi: 10.1007/s00393-012-1038-0.
3
Cost per responder associated with biologic therapies for Crohn's disease, psoriasis, and rheumatoid arthritis.与克罗恩病、银屑病和类风湿关节炎的生物治疗相关的应答者成本。
Adv Ther. 2012 Jul;29(7):620-34. doi: 10.1007/s12325-012-0035-7. Epub 2012 Jul 27.
4
Infliximab for 6 months added on combination therapy in early rheumatoid arthritis: 2-year results from an investigator-initiated, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (the NEO-RACo Study).英夫利昔单抗联合早期类风湿关节炎的治疗 6 个月:一项由研究者发起的、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究(NEO-RACo 研究)的 2 年结果。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Jun;72(6):851-7. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201365. Epub 2012 Jun 30.
5
Induction therapy with adalimumab plus methotrexate for 24 weeks followed by methotrexate monotherapy up to week 48 versus methotrexate therapy alone for DMARD-naive patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: HIT HARD, an investigator-initiated study.阿达木单抗联合甲氨蝶呤诱导治疗 24 周,随后至第 48 周给予甲氨蝶呤单药治疗,与甲氨蝶呤单药治疗比较,用于早期类风湿关节炎的初治 DMARD 患者:一项研究者发起的 HIT HARD 研究。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Jun;72(6):844-50. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201612. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
6
A randomized comparative effectiveness study of oral triple therapy versus etanercept plus methotrexate in early aggressive rheumatoid arthritis: the treatment of Early Aggressive Rheumatoid Arthritis Trial.口服三联疗法与依那西普联合甲氨蝶呤治疗早期侵袭性类风湿关节炎的随机对照有效性研究:早期侵袭性类风湿关节炎治疗试验
Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Sep;64(9):2824-35. doi: 10.1002/art.34498.
7
Conventional combination treatment versus biological treatment in methotrexate-refractory early rheumatoid arthritis: 2 year follow-up of the randomised, non-blinded, parallel-group Swefot trial.甲氨蝶呤耐药的早期类风湿关节炎的常规联合治疗与生物治疗:随机、非盲、平行组 Swefot 试验的 2 年随访。
Lancet. 2012 May 5;379(9827):1712-20. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60027-0. Epub 2012 Mar 29.
8
The impact of four dynamic, goal-steered treatment strategies on the 5-year outcomes of rheumatoid arthritis patients in the BeSt study.贝达喹啉治疗耐多药肺结核的研究(Bedaquiline in Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis)
Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Jun;70(6):1039-46. doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.141234. Epub 2011 Mar 17.
9
[Combination therapy using methotrexate with DMARDs or biologics--current status].[甲氨蝶呤与改善病情抗风湿药或生物制剂联合治疗——现状]
Z Rheumatol. 2011 Feb;70(2):114-22. doi: 10.1007/s00393-010-0684-3.
10
Rheumatoid arthritis.类风湿关节炎。
Lancet. 2010 Sep 25;376(9746):1094-108. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60826-4.

德国 TNF-α 治疗的应答者成本。

Cost per responder of TNF-α therapies in Germany.

机构信息

Rudolf Buchheim Institute of Pharmacology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Schubertstrasse 81, 35392, Giessen, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Rheumatol. 2013 Dec;32(12):1805-9. doi: 10.1007/s10067-013-2332-1. Epub 2013 Jul 23.

DOI:10.1007/s10067-013-2332-1
PMID:23877487
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4544564/
Abstract

Tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) inhibitors ranked highest in German pharmaceutical expenditure in 2011. Their most important application is the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Our objective is to analyze cost per responder of TNF-α inhibitors for RA from the German Statutory Health Insurance funds' perspective. We aim to conduct the analysis based on randomized comparative effectiveness studies of the relevant treatments for the German setting. For inclusion of effectiveness studies, we require results in terms of response rates as defined by European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) or American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria. We identify conventional triple therapy as the relevant comparator. We calculate cost per responder based on German direct medical costs. Direct clinical comparisons could be identified for both etanercept and infliximab compared to triple therapy. For infliximab, cost per responder was 216,392 euros for ACR50 and 432,784 euros for ACR70 responses. For etanercept, cost per ACR70 responder was 321,527 euros. Cost was lower for response defined by EULAR criteria, but data was only available for infliximab. Cost per responder is overestimated by 40% due to inclusion of taxes and mandatory rebates in German drugs' list prices. Our analysis shows specific requirements for cost-effectiveness analysis in Germany. Cost per responder for TNF-α treatment in the German setting is more than double the cost estimated in a similar analysis for the USA, which measured against placebo. The difference in results shows the critical role of the correct comparator for a specific setting.

摘要

肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)抑制剂在 2011 年德国药品支出中排名最高。它们最重要的应用是治疗类风湿关节炎(RA)。我们的目的是从德国法定健康保险基金的角度分析 TNF-α抑制剂治疗 RA 的每个应答者的成本。我们旨在根据德国背景下相关治疗的随机对照有效性研究进行分析。为了纳入有效性研究,我们需要以欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)或美国风湿病学会(ACR)标准定义的反应率为结果。我们将常规三联疗法作为相关的对照疗法。我们根据德国直接医疗成本计算每个应答者的成本。可以确定常规三联疗法与依那西普和英夫利昔单抗相比的直接临床比较。对于英夫利昔单抗,ACR50 的应答者的成本为 216392 欧元,ACR70 的应答者的成本为 432784 欧元。对于依那西普,ACR70 应答者的成本为 321527 欧元。根据 EULAR 标准定义的反应的成本较低,但仅可获得英夫利昔单抗的数据。由于德国药品目录价格中包含税收和强制性回扣,因此每个应答者的成本被高估了 40%。我们的分析表明,德国对成本效益分析有特定的要求。德国 TNF-α治疗的每个应答者的成本是在美国类似分析中针对安慰剂估计的成本的两倍多。结果的差异表明了正确对照对于特定环境的关键作用。