Rudolf Buchheim Institute of Pharmacology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Schubertstrasse 81, 35392, Giessen, Germany.
Clin Rheumatol. 2013 Dec;32(12):1805-9. doi: 10.1007/s10067-013-2332-1. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
Tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) inhibitors ranked highest in German pharmaceutical expenditure in 2011. Their most important application is the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Our objective is to analyze cost per responder of TNF-α inhibitors for RA from the German Statutory Health Insurance funds' perspective. We aim to conduct the analysis based on randomized comparative effectiveness studies of the relevant treatments for the German setting. For inclusion of effectiveness studies, we require results in terms of response rates as defined by European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) or American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria. We identify conventional triple therapy as the relevant comparator. We calculate cost per responder based on German direct medical costs. Direct clinical comparisons could be identified for both etanercept and infliximab compared to triple therapy. For infliximab, cost per responder was 216,392 euros for ACR50 and 432,784 euros for ACR70 responses. For etanercept, cost per ACR70 responder was 321,527 euros. Cost was lower for response defined by EULAR criteria, but data was only available for infliximab. Cost per responder is overestimated by 40% due to inclusion of taxes and mandatory rebates in German drugs' list prices. Our analysis shows specific requirements for cost-effectiveness analysis in Germany. Cost per responder for TNF-α treatment in the German setting is more than double the cost estimated in a similar analysis for the USA, which measured against placebo. The difference in results shows the critical role of the correct comparator for a specific setting.
肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)抑制剂在 2011 年德国药品支出中排名最高。它们最重要的应用是治疗类风湿关节炎(RA)。我们的目的是从德国法定健康保险基金的角度分析 TNF-α抑制剂治疗 RA 的每个应答者的成本。我们旨在根据德国背景下相关治疗的随机对照有效性研究进行分析。为了纳入有效性研究,我们需要以欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)或美国风湿病学会(ACR)标准定义的反应率为结果。我们将常规三联疗法作为相关的对照疗法。我们根据德国直接医疗成本计算每个应答者的成本。可以确定常规三联疗法与依那西普和英夫利昔单抗相比的直接临床比较。对于英夫利昔单抗,ACR50 的应答者的成本为 216392 欧元,ACR70 的应答者的成本为 432784 欧元。对于依那西普,ACR70 应答者的成本为 321527 欧元。根据 EULAR 标准定义的反应的成本较低,但仅可获得英夫利昔单抗的数据。由于德国药品目录价格中包含税收和强制性回扣,因此每个应答者的成本被高估了 40%。我们的分析表明,德国对成本效益分析有特定的要求。德国 TNF-α治疗的每个应答者的成本是在美国类似分析中针对安慰剂估计的成本的两倍多。结果的差异表明了正确对照对于特定环境的关键作用。