Suppr超能文献

儿童热性惊厥的预防性药物管理(综述)

Prophylactic drug management for febrile seizures in children (Review).

作者信息

Offringa Martin, Newton Richard

机构信息

ChildHealth Evaluative Sciences, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Evid Based Child Health. 2013 Jul;8(4):1376-485. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1921.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Febrile seizures occurring in a child older than one month during an episode of fever affect 2% to 4% of children in Great Britain and the United States and recur in 30%. Rapid-acting antiepileptics and antipyretics given during subsequent fever episodes have been used to avoid the adverse effects of continuous antiepileptic drugs.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of antiepileptic and antipyretic drugs used prophylactically to treat children with febrile seizures.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2011. Issue 3); MEDLINE (1966 to May 2011); EMBASE (1966 to May 2011); Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness (DARE) (May 2011). No language restrictions were imposed. We also contacted researchers in the field to identify continuing or unpublished studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Trials using randomised or quasi-randomised patient allocation that compared the use of antiepileptic or antipyretic agents with each other, placebo or no treatment.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors (RN and MO) independently applied pre-defined criteria to select trials for inclusion and extracted the pre-defined relevant data, recording methods for randomisation, blinding and exclusions. Outcomes assessed were seizure recurrence at 6, 12, 18, 24, 36 months and at age 5 to 6 years in the intervention and non-intervention groups, and adverse medication effects. The presence of publication bias was assessed using funnel plots.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirty-six articles describing 26 randomised trials with 2740 randomised participants were included. Thirteen interventions of continuous or intermittent prophylaxis and their control treatments were analysed. Methodological quality was moderate to poor in most studies. We could not do a meta-analysis for eight of the 13 comparisons due to insufficient numbers of trials. No significant benefit for valproate, pyridoxine, intermittent phenobarbitone or ibuprofen versus placebo or no treatment was found; nor for diclofenac versus placebo followed by ibuprofen, acetominophen or placebo; nor for intermittent rectal diazepam versus intermittent valproate, nor phenobarbitone versus intermittent rectal diazepam. There was a significant reduction of recurrent febrile seizures with intermittent oral diazepam versus placebo with a relative risk (RR) of 0.67 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48 to 0.94) at 24 months), RR of 0.61 (95% CI 0.15 to 0.89) at 48 months, with no benefit at 6, 12 or 72 months. Phenobarbitone versus placebo or no treatment reduced seizures at 6, 12 and 24 months but not at 18 or 72 month follow up (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.84 at 6 months; RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.75 at 12 months; and RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.88 at 24 months). Intermittent rectal diazepam versus no treatment or placebo also reduced seizures (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.86 at 6 months; RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.87 at 12 months; RR 0.2, 95% CI 0.1 to 0.39 at 18 months; RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.71 at 36 months), with no benefit at 24 months. Intermittent clobazam compared to placebo at 6 months resulted in a RR of 0.09 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.30), an effect found against an extremely high (83.3%) recurrence rate in the controls and which is a result that needs replication. The recording of adverse effects was variable. Lower comprehension scores in phenobarbitone treated children were found in two studies. In general, adverse effects were recorded in up to some 30% of children in the phenobarbitone treated group and in up to 36% in benzodiazepine treated groups. Evidence of publication bias was found in the meta analyses of comparisons for phenobarbitone versus placebo (8 studies) at 12 months but not at 6 months (6 studies); and valproate versus placebo (4 studies) at 12 months; with too few studies to identify publication bias for the other comparisons.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: No clinically important benefits for children with febrile seizures were found for intermittent oral diazepam, phenytoin, phenobarbitone, intermittent rectal diazepam, valproate, pyridoxine, intermittent phenobarbitone or intermittent ibuprofen, nor for diclofenac versus placebo followed by ibuprofen, acetominophen or placebo. Adverse effects were reported in up to 30% of children. Apparent benefit for clobazam treatment in one recent trial needs to be replicated to be judged reliable. Given the benign nature of recurrent febrile seizures, and the high prevalence of adverse effects of these drugs, parents and families should be supported with adequate contact details of medical services and information on recurrence, first aid management and, most importantly, the benign nature of the phenomenon.

摘要

背景

在英国和美国,1个月以上儿童发热时发生的热性惊厥影响2%至4%的儿童,其中30%会复发。在随后的发热发作期间使用速效抗癫痫药和退烧药,以避免连续使用抗癫痫药物的不良反应。

目的

评估预防性使用抗癫痫和退烧药治疗热性惊厥儿童的有效性和安全性。

检索方法

我们检索了Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)(Cochrane图书馆2011年第3期);MEDLINE(1966年至2011年5月);EMBASE(1966年至2011年5月);有效性评价文摘数据库(DARE)(2011年5月)。未设语言限制。我们还联系了该领域的研究人员,以确定正在进行或未发表的研究。

选择标准

采用随机或半随机患者分配的试验,比较抗癫痫药或退烧药与其他药物、安慰剂或不治疗的使用情况。

数据收集与分析

两位综述作者(RN和MO)独立应用预定义标准选择纳入试验,并提取预定义的相关数据,记录随机化、盲法和排除的方法。评估的结局是干预组和非干预组在6、12、18、24、36个月以及5至6岁时的癫痫复发情况,以及药物不良反应。使用漏斗图评估发表偏倚的存在。

主要结果

纳入了36篇文章,描述了26项随机试验,共2740名随机参与者。分析了13种连续或间歇预防干预措施及其对照治疗。大多数研究的方法学质量为中等至较差。由于试验数量不足,13项比较中的8项无法进行荟萃分析。未发现丙戊酸盐、吡哆醇、间歇苯巴比妥或布洛芬与安慰剂或不治疗相比有显著益处;双氯芬酸与安慰剂相比,随后使用布洛芬、对乙酰氨基酚或安慰剂也无显著益处;间歇直肠地西泮与间歇丙戊酸盐相比,苯巴比妥与间歇直肠地西泮相比也无显著益处。与安慰剂相比,间歇口服地西泮可显著降低热性惊厥复发率,24个月时相对危险度(RR)为0.67(95%置信区间(CI)0.48至0.94),48个月时RR为0.61(95%CI0.15至0.89),6、12或72个月时无益处。苯巴比妥与安慰剂或不治疗相比,在6、12和24个月时可降低癫痫发作,但在18或72个月随访时无此效果(6个月时RR0.60,95%CI0.42至0.84;12个月时RR0.59,95%CI0.46至0.75;24个月时RR0.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验