• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

速尿和氨氯吡咪的不同作用模式及作用部位。

The separate modes and sites of action of furosemide and amiloride.

作者信息

Knauf H, Schollmeyer P, Steinhardt H J

出版信息

Clin Nephrol. 1975;3(4):148-52.

PMID:238780
Abstract

The effect of furosemide and amiloride on the transport of sodium, potassium, hydrogen and bicarbonate ions was studied in microperfusion experiments on the main excretory duct of the submaxillary gland of the rat. Furosemide did not impair transport of Na+, K+ and H+/HCO-3. Amiloride, however, completely abolished Na+ transport. Blockade of Na+ transport was accompanied by abolition of passive K+ secretion, whereas the active components of K+ and HCO-3 secretion were not affected. In urinary excretion studies, amiloride, which is known to block sodium transport selectively, was used in order to assess whether furosemide has a distinct effect that is independent of sodium transport. Oral administration of amiloride caused a selective excretion of Na+ in a more alkaline urine with an extremely low K+ concentration. The injection of furosemide caused a copious diuresis of an isotonic urine, in which excretion of Na+ and K+ was balanced by the excretion of Cl- ions. Combined administration of amiloride and furosemide produced summation of the individual effects of both diuretics, indicating that the two drugs had different sites and modes of action. In the presence of furosemide the kidney no longer responded to antidiuretic hormone, which suggested that the urine concentrating mechanism in Henle's loop was blocked by furosemide.

摘要

在大鼠下颌下腺主排泄管的微灌注实验中,研究了呋塞米和阿米洛利对钠、钾、氢和碳酸氢根离子转运的影响。呋塞米不损害Na⁺、K⁺和H⁺/HCO₃⁻的转运。然而,阿米洛利完全消除了Na⁺的转运。Na⁺转运的阻断伴随着被动K⁺分泌的消除,而K⁺和HCO₃⁻分泌的主动成分未受影响。在尿排泄研究中,使用已知能选择性阻断钠转运的阿米洛利,以评估呋塞米是否具有独立于钠转运的独特作用。口服阿米洛利导致Na⁺在碱性更强、K⁺浓度极低的尿液中选择性排泄。注射呋塞米导致等渗尿液大量利尿,其中Na⁺和K⁺的排泄由Cl⁻离子的排泄平衡。联合给予阿米洛利和呋塞米产生了两种利尿剂各自作用的总和,表明这两种药物具有不同的作用部位和作用方式。在呋塞米存在的情况下,肾脏不再对抗利尿激素产生反应,这表明呋塞米阻断了亨利袢中的尿液浓缩机制。

相似文献

1
The separate modes and sites of action of furosemide and amiloride.速尿和氨氯吡咪的不同作用模式及作用部位。
Clin Nephrol. 1975;3(4):148-52.
2
Interference with feedback control of glomerular filtration rate by furosemide, triflocin, and cyanide.速尿、曲弗罗辛和氰化物对肾小球滤过率反馈控制的干扰。
J Clin Invest. 1974 Jun;53(6):1695-708. doi: 10.1172/JCI107721.
3
[The mechanism of the increase in potassium excretion produced by furosemide (author's transl)].[速尿导致钾排泄增加的机制(作者译)]
Rev Bras Pesqui Med Biol. 1979 Dec;12(6):391-9.
4
Site and mechanism of action of trichlormethiazide in rabbit distal nephron segments perfused in vitro.三氯噻嗪在体外灌注的兔远端肾单位节段中的作用部位及作用机制。
J Clin Invest. 1988 Aug;82(2):721-30. doi: 10.1172/JCI113653.
5
Evidence for Na+ independent active secretion of K+ and HCO - 3 by rat salivary duct epithelium.大鼠唾液腺导管上皮细胞存在不依赖钠离子的钾离子和碳酸氢根离子主动分泌的证据。
Pflugers Arch. 1975 Dec 19;361(1):55-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00587339.
6
Magnesium and potassium-sparing diuretics.镁剂和保钾利尿剂。
Magnesium. 1986;5(5-6):282-92.
7
[Inhibition of the exchange of Na+ for K+ and and H+ by triamterene (in epithelia)(author's transl)].氨苯蝶啶对上皮细胞中Na⁺与K⁺及H⁺交换的抑制作用(作者译)
Arzneimittelforschung. 1976 Apr;26(4):484-6.
8
A micropuncture study on the renal site of action of ICI 206,970, a unique eukalemic diuretic.对一种独特的真性血钙过少利尿剂ICI 206,970的肾脏作用部位的微穿刺研究。
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1993 Feb;264(2):604-8.
9
Non-specific inhibition of membrane-ATPase by amiloride: a comparative in vivo and in vitro study with ouabain.阿米洛利对膜ATP酶的非特异性抑制作用:与哇巴因的体内外比较研究
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1976;292(2):189-92. doi: 10.1007/BF00498591.
10
Evaluation of the renal site of action of a novel, eukalemic diuretic, ICI 207,828.新型等渗利尿剂ICI 207,828的肾脏作用部位评估
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1992 Feb;260(2):458-62.