Rashid Anwar, Beswick Eleanor, Galitzine Svetlana, Fitton Laurence
Department of Anaesthetics, Bedford Hospital NHS Trust, Bedford, UK Nuffield Division of Anaesthetics, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK.
Emergency Department, Milton Keynes Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Milton Keynes, UK Emergency Department, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK.
Emerg Med J. 2014 Nov;31(11):909-13. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2013-202794. Epub 2013 Jul 22.
While the benefits of regional analgesia (RA) for preoperative pain relief in hip fracture (HF) in elderly patients are well recognised, this service is yet to be established in many UK emergency departments (EDs). We set out to discover how widely RA is adopted in the UK EDs.
In April-July 2010, we conducted a postal survey of 218 UK EDs, followed up with fax reminders for non-respondents.
A total of 147/218 (67%) EDs completed the survey. Sixty five (44%) respondents reported use of RA blocks for HF. The commonest stated reasons for not using RA were lack of trained staff (36%) or appropriate equipment (22%). RA users practiced femoral nerve block most widely (60% of EDs) followed by fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) (22%).
It is more a lack of trained staff and suitable equipment that prevents RA blocks being widely adopted in the UK. We advocate FICB in HF patients, which is an easy landmark-based block that can be safely performed by ED doctors. Our survey initiated multidisciplinary consultation and development of a protocol for preoperative FICB in HFs in our teaching hospital ED.
RA for HFs is not widely used in UK EDs, proving that there is room for improvement .The finding that RA blocks are performed by the ED medical staff in 84% of the responding EDs practising RA was reassuring for developing the service in our hospital. FICB should be considered as an alternative to parenteral analgesia in adult patients with HF.
尽管区域镇痛(RA)对老年髋部骨折(HF)患者术前疼痛缓解的益处已得到充分认可,但在英国许多急诊科(ED)中,这项服务尚未建立。我们着手探究RA在英国急诊科中的应用普及程度。
2010年4月至7月,我们对218家英国急诊科进行了邮寄调查,对未回复者发送传真提醒进行跟进。
共有147/218(67%)家急诊科完成了调查。65家(44%)回复者报告在髋部骨折中使用了RA阻滞。最常提及的未使用RA的原因是缺乏训练有素的 staff(36%)或合适的设备(22%)。RA使用者中最广泛实施股神经阻滞的占60%(急诊科),其次是髂筋膜间隙阻滞(FICB)(22%)。
在英国,正是缺乏训练有素的 staff 和合适的设备阻碍了RA阻滞被广泛采用。我们提倡对髋部骨折患者采用FICB,这是一种基于易于识别的标志的阻滞方法,急诊科医生可以安全地实施。我们的调查引发了多学科会诊,并制定了我们教学医院急诊科髋部骨折术前FICB的方案。
RA用于髋部骨折在英国急诊科中未广泛使用,这表明仍有改进空间。在84%实施RA的回复急诊科中,RA阻滞由急诊科医务人员进行这一发现为我们医院开展这项服务提供了信心。对于成年髋部骨折患者,应考虑将FICB作为胃肠外镇痛的替代方法。