Suppr超能文献

[在急诊科对股骨近端骨折患者使用区域麻醉进行术前镇痛:德语区国家和英国当前实践的调查]

[Use of regional anesthesia for preoperative analgesia for proximal femoral fractures in the emergency department : A survey on current practice in German-speaking countries and the United Kingdom].

作者信息

Müller M, Passegger O, Zehnder P, Hanschen M, Muggleton E, Biberthaler P, Wegmann H, Greve F

机构信息

Fakultät für Medizin, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfallchirurgie, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, München, Deutschland.

Fakultät für Medizin, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Technische Universität München, München, Deutschland.

出版信息

Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb). 2023 Jun;126(6):456-462. doi: 10.1007/s00113-023-01315-y. Epub 2023 Apr 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Regional anesthesia (RA) techniques such as femoral nerve block (FNB) or fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) are effective analgesia techniques in the treatment of pain from proximal femoral fractures (PFF). While in Great Britain (GB) these are already frequently used in the emergency department for preoperative analgesia, in the German-speaking D‑A-CH area (Germany, Austria, Switzerland) this seems to occur much less frequently. Therefore, the aim of this study was to survey the type and frequency of RA procedures used and to compare international practice.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In the D‑A-CH area as well as in GB, registered emergency departments were contacted and invited to participate in an online survey. The survey included questions on the frequency and type of RA procedures, reasons for non-use, equipment used, person performing the procedure and medications used.

RESULTS

The participation rate was 17.4% (142/818 emergency departments). RA procedures for preoperative analgesia in PFF were used in 18.3% (21/115) of hospitals in the D‑A-CH region and in 96.3% (26/27) in GB. The most commonly used block was the FICB in GB at 96.2% (25/26) and the FNB in Germany at 66.7% (14/21). In the D‑A-CH area, RA procedures are primarily performed by anesthesiology specialists 71.4% (15/21), and in GB by emergency department residents 65.4% (17/26).

DISCUSSION

RA procedures are still performed too rarely following PFF in emergency departments in the D‑A-CH area. In international comparison with GB there is potential for improvement.

摘要

背景

区域麻醉(RA)技术,如股神经阻滞(FNB)或髂筋膜间隙阻滞(FICB),是治疗股骨近端骨折(PFF)疼痛的有效镇痛技术。在英国(GB),这些技术已在急诊科频繁用于术前镇痛,但在德语区的D-A-CH地区(德国、奥地利、瑞士),其使用频率似乎要低得多。因此,本研究的目的是调查所使用的RA程序的类型和频率,并比较国际上的做法。

材料与方法

在D-A-CH地区以及英国,联系了注册的急诊科并邀请其参与在线调查。该调查包括有关RA程序的频率和类型、不使用的原因、使用的设备、执行程序人员以及使用的药物等问题。

结果

参与率为17.4%(142/818个急诊科)。D-A-CH地区18.3%(21/115)的医院将RA程序用于PFF的术前镇痛,而在英国这一比例为96.3%(26/27)。英国最常用的阻滞是FICB,占96.2%(25/26),德国最常用的是FNB,占66.7%(14/21)。在D-A-CH地区,RA程序主要由麻醉科专家执行,占71.4%(15/21),而在英国则主要由急诊科住院医师执行,占65.4%(17/26)。

讨论

在D-A-CH地区的急诊科,PFF后进行RA程序的情况仍然很少。与英国进行国际比较后发现仍有改进空间。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验