BSEF, CIRAD, 34398 Montpellier, France.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 Jul 22;368(1625):20120302. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0302. Print 2013.
Large areas of African moist forests are being logged in the context of supposedly sustainable management plans. It remains however controversial whether harvesting a few trees per hectare can be maintained in the long term while preserving other forest services as well. We used a unique 24 year silvicultural experiment, encompassing 10 4 ha plots established in the Central African Republic, to assess the effect of disturbance linked to logging (two to nine trees ha⁻¹ greater than or equal to 80 cm DBH) and thinning (11-41 trees ha⁻¹ greater than or equal to 50 cm DBH) on the structure and dynamics of the forest. Before silvicultural treatments, above-ground biomass (AGB) and timber stock (i.e. the volume of commercial trees greater than or equal to 80 cm DBH) in the plots amounted 374.5 ± 58.2 Mg ha⁻¹ and 79.7 ± 45.9 m³ ha⁻¹, respectively. We found that (i) natural control forest was increasing in AGB (2.58 ± 1.73 Mg dry mass ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹) and decreasing in timber stock (-0.33 ± 1.57 m³ ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹); (ii) the AGB recovered very quickly after logging and thinning, at a rate proportional to the disturbance intensity (mean recovery after 24 years: 144%). Compared with controls, the gain almost doubled in the logged plots (4.82 ± 1.22 Mg ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹) and tripled in the logged + thinned plots (8.03 ± 1.41 Mg ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹); (iii) the timber stock recovered slowly (mean recovery after 24 years: 41%), at a rate of 0.75 ± 0.51 m³ ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹ in the logged plots, and 0.81 ± 0.74 m³ ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹ in the logged + thinned plots. Although thinning significantly increased the gain in biomass, it had no effect on the gain in timber stock. However, thinning did foster the growth and survival of small- and medium-sized timber trees and should have a positive effect over the next felling cycle.
大片的非洲湿润森林正在被砍伐,而这些砍伐活动据称是在可持续管理计划的框架下进行的。然而,人们对于在长期内维持每公顷几棵树的采伐量,同时又能保护其他森林服务,仍然存在争议。我们利用一个独特的 24 年造林实验,该实验涵盖了在中非共和国建立的 10 个 4 公顷的样地,评估了与采伐(每公顷 2 至 9 棵大于或等于 80 厘米胸径)和间伐(每公顷 11 至 41 棵大于或等于 50 厘米胸径)相关的干扰对森林结构和动态的影响。在造林处理之前,样地的地上生物量(AGB)和木材蓄积量(即大于或等于 80 厘米胸径的商业树木的体积)分别为 374.5 ± 58.2 Mg ha⁻¹和 79.7 ± 45.9 m³ ha⁻¹。我们发现:(i)自然控制林的 AGB 正在增加(2.58 ± 1.73 Mg 干物质 ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹),木材蓄积量正在减少(-0.33 ± 1.57 m³ ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹);(ii)采伐和间伐后 AGB 很快恢复,恢复速度与干扰强度成正比(24 年后的平均恢复量:144%)。与对照相比,采伐样地的增益几乎翻了一番(4.82 ± 1.22 Mg ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹),而采伐+间伐样地的增益增加了两倍(8.03 ± 1.41 Mg ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹);(iii)木材蓄积量恢复缓慢(24 年后的平均恢复量:41%),采伐样地的恢复速度为 0.75 ± 0.51 m³ ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹,而采伐+间伐样地的恢复速度为 0.81 ± 0.74 m³ ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹。尽管间伐显著增加了生物量的增益,但对木材蓄积量的增益没有影响。然而,间伐确实促进了中小径木材树木的生长和存活,应该对下一个采伐周期产生积极影响。