Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK.
MRC Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Metabolic Sciences, Cambridge, UK.
Br J Nutr. 2014 Jan 28;111(2):342-52. doi: 10.1017/S0007114513002298. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
In the present study, we investigated the association between dietary intake of carbohydrates and the risk of type 2 diabetes. Incident cases of diabetes (n 749) were identified and compared with a randomly selected subcohort of 3496 participants aged 40-79 years. For dietary assessment, we used 7 d food diaries administered at baseline. We carried out modified Cox proportional hazards regression analyses and compared results obtained from the different methods of adjustment for total energy intake. Dietary intakes of total carbohydrates, starch, sucrose, lactose or maltose were not significantly related to diabetes risk after adjustment for confounders. However, in the residual method for energy adjustment, intakes of fructose and glucose were inversely related to diabetes risk. The multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HR) of diabetes comparing the extreme quintiles of intake were 0·79 (95 % CI 0·59, 1·07; P for trend = 0·03) for glucose and 0·62 (95 % CI 0·46, 0·83; P for trend = 0·01) for fructose. In the nutrient density method, only fructose was inversely related to diabetes risk (HR 0·65, 95 % CI 0·48, 0·88). The replacement of 5 % energy intake from SFA with an isoenergetic amount of fructose was associated with a 30 % lower diabetes risk (HR 0·69, 95 % CI 0·50, 0·96). Results of the standard and energy partition methods were similar to those of the residual method. These prospective findings suggest that the intakes of starch and sucrose are not associated, but that those of fructose and glucose are inversely associated with diabetes risk. Whether the inverse associations with fructose and glucose reflect the effect of substitution of these carbohydrate subtypes with other nutrients (i.e. SFA), their net higher intake or other nutrients associated with their intake remains to be established through further investigation.
在本研究中,我们调查了碳水化合物的饮食摄入与 2 型糖尿病风险之间的关联。确定了糖尿病的发病病例(n=749),并与年龄在 40-79 岁的 3496 名随机选择的亚组参与者进行了比较。对于饮食评估,我们在基线时使用了 7 天的食物日记。我们进行了修正的 Cox 比例风险回归分析,并比较了总能量摄入不同调整方法的结果。在调整混杂因素后,总碳水化合物、淀粉、蔗糖、乳糖或麦芽糖的饮食摄入量与糖尿病风险无显著相关性。然而,在能量调整的残差方法中,果糖和葡萄糖的摄入量与糖尿病风险呈负相关。比较摄入量极端五分位数的多变量调整后的糖尿病风险比(HR)为葡萄糖为 0.79(95%CI 0.59,1.07;趋势 P=0.03),果糖为 0.62(95%CI 0.46,0.83;趋势 P=0.01)。在营养素密度法中,只有果糖与糖尿病风险呈负相关(HR 0.65,95%CI 0.48,0.88)。用等能量的果糖替代 5%的 SFA 能量摄入与糖尿病风险降低 30%相关(HR 0.69,95%CI 0.50,0.96)。标准和能量划分方法的结果与残差方法相似。这些前瞻性发现表明,淀粉和蔗糖的摄入量没有相关性,但果糖和葡萄糖的摄入量与糖尿病风险呈负相关。果糖和葡萄糖的负相关是否反映了这些碳水化合物亚型与其他营养素(即 SFA)的替代、它们的净摄入量较高或与它们的摄入量相关的其他营养素的影响,仍需通过进一步研究来确定。