Whyte Elisabeth M, Nelson Keith E, Scherf K Suzanne
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014 Feb;57(1):120-30. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2013/12-0308).
When researchers investigate figurative language abilities (including idioms) in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), syntax abilities may be more important than once considered. In addition, there are limitations to the overreliance on false-belief tasks to measure theory of mind (TOM) abilities. In the current study, the authors investigated idiom, syntax, and advanced TOM abilities in children with ASD compared to children with typical development (TD).
Twenty-six children with ASD, ages 5 to 12 years, were compared to individuals in each of 2 control groups of children with TD: 1 matched on chronological age and nonverbal IQ, and 1 matched on syntax age-equivalence and raw scores. Idiom comprehension, syntax, vocabulary, and 2 measures of advanced TOM abilities were examined.
Although children with ASD performed worse on idiom comprehension compared to the age-matched group with TD, they exhibited comparable idiom performance to the syntax-matched group with TD. Advanced TOM abilities were related to idiom comprehension for children with ASD, but not for children with TD, above the contributions of basic language abilities.
Syntax abilities should be used as a matching variable when examining figurative or other late-developing language skills.
当研究人员调查自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童的比喻语言能力(包括习语)时,句法能力可能比以往认为的更为重要。此外,过度依赖错误信念任务来衡量心理理论(TOM)能力存在局限性。在本研究中,作者比较了ASD儿童与典型发育(TD)儿童的习语、句法和高级TOM能力。
将26名年龄在5至12岁的ASD儿童与两个TD儿童对照组中的每组个体进行比较:一组在实际年龄和非语言智商上匹配,另一组在句法年龄等效性和原始分数上匹配。检查了习语理解、句法、词汇以及两种高级TOM能力的测量方法。
尽管与年龄匹配的TD组相比,ASD儿童在习语理解方面表现较差,但他们与句法匹配的TD组表现出相当的习语能力。在基本语言能力的贡献之上,高级TOM能力与ASD儿童的习语理解相关,但与TD儿童无关。
在检查比喻或其他后期发展的语言技能时,应将句法能力用作匹配变量。