Suppr超能文献

为何迄今针对抗血小板治疗的个体化研究均以失败告终?

Why have studies of tailored anti-platelet therapy failed so far?

机构信息

Jolanta Siller-Matula, MD, PhD, Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, Tel.: +43 1 40 400 4614, Fax: +43 1 40 400 4216, E-mail:

出版信息

Thromb Haemost. 2013 Oct;110(4):628-31. doi: 10.1160/TH13-03-0250. Epub 2013 Jul 25.

Abstract

Published data linking clopidogrel non-responsiveness to adverse ischaemic events lead to the suggestion that the magnitude of platelet inhibition by clopidogrel can be monitored and individually adjusted. This has been tested in randomised clinical trials (ARCTIC, GRAVITAS and TRIGGER-PCI), but despite reducing platelet reactivity, a strategy of therapy adjustment based on platelet function monitoring did not reduce the incidence of cardiac ischaemic events. Several critical issues regarding the design of these trials, which might in part have led to negative results, are discussed in this article.

摘要

已有数据将氯吡格雷无反应性与不良缺血事件联系起来,这提示我们可以监测并个体化调整氯吡格雷对血小板的抑制程度。这已在随机临床试验(ARCTIC、GRAVITAS 和 TRIGGER-PCI)中得到检验,但尽管降低了血小板反应性,基于血小板功能监测的治疗调整策略并未降低心脏缺血事件的发生率。本文讨论了这些试验设计中的几个关键问题,这些问题可能在一定程度上导致了阴性结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验