Fanigliulo A, Mancino O, Fanti P, Crescenzi A
Bioagritest Test Facility, Bioagritest Srl - Centro Interregionale di Diagnosi Vegetale, Zona PIP lotto E2. 85010 Pignola, PZ, Italy.
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci. 2012;77(4):677-84.
A study was performed in the period May-July 2011 by Bioagritest test facility according to EPPO guidelines and Principles of Good Experimental Practice (GEP), in the land of Eboli (SA), southern Italy, with the purpose to test a new insecticide mixture in the defense strategies of processing tomato against Tuta absoluta and Spodoptera littoralis. The insecticide mixture Chlorantraniliprole 100 g/lambda-Cyhalothrin 50 g/l 0,4 It/ha was applied in a tomato field in four (A-B-C-D) application timings (a.t.) alone (treatment 2) and in two a.t. (A-B) combined with emamectin benzoate 0.5%, 1,5 Kg/ha (a.t. C-D) (treatment 3). Its effect in containing insect populations was compared with that exerted by emamectin benzoate 0.5%, 1,5 Kg/ha (a.t. A-B-C-D) (treatment 4) and the combination of chlorantraniliprole 35%, 0.115 Kg/ha (a.t. A-B) and indoxacarb 30% 0.125 Kg/ha (a.t. C-D) (treatment 5). Application of treatments (trt.) and mode of assessment (2 assessments), recording and measurements followed the guidelines foreseen by EPPO Standards PP1/150 and PP1/275. The lepidoptera infestation in the tomato crop was very high on both the leaves and fruits, and this enabled us to evaluate the efficacy of the tested products in conditions of severe pests infestation. If we consider the leaf damage, either as number of mines by T. absoluta or as % of leaf erosion by S. litteralis, all the treatments values were statistically lower than control, but with no difference among them. But when using as an infestation threshold the percentage of damaged fruits (much more relevant in economic terms), we observed statistically significant differences among treatments. Actually, treatment with chlorantraniliprole-lambda-cyhalothrin mixture was significantly more effective than the one with emamectin benzoate in reducing the attack of T. absoluta on tomato fruits, in both dates of assessments. As concerns damage by S. littoralis on the fruits, at the first assessment, trt. 2 and trt. 5 significantly reduced the percentage of infested berries in comparison with the control, whereas the infestation was not significantly reduced by trt. 3 and trt. 4. At the second assessment, no statistically significant difference between the four different treatments was observed. Since the infestation of tomato fruits by S. littoralis was much lower than the one caused by T. obsoluta, the overall performance of the four insecticide treatments was mainly due to the control effects towards T. obsoluta.
2011年5月至7月期间,Bioagritest测试机构按照欧洲和地中海植物保护组织(EPPO)的指南及良好实验规范(GEP)原则,在意大利南部埃博利(SA)地区开展了一项研究,旨在测试一种新型杀虫剂混合物在加工番茄防治番茄潜叶蛾和海滨夜蛾的防御策略中的效果。将100克/升氯虫苯甲酰胺+50克/升高效氯氟氰菊酯、0.4升/公顷的杀虫剂混合物分别在四个施药时期(A - B - C - D)单独施用(处理2),以及在两个施药时期(A - B)与0.5%甲氨基阿维菌素苯甲酸盐、1.5千克/公顷(施药时期C - D)混合施用(处理3)。将其控制害虫种群的效果与0.5%甲氨基阿维菌素苯甲酸盐、1.5千克/公顷(施药时期A - B - C - D)(处理4)以及35%氯虫苯甲酰胺、0.115千克/公顷(施药时期A - B)和30%茚虫威、0.125千克/公顷(施药时期C - D)的组合(处理5)进行比较。处理的施用(trt.)和评估方式(2次评估)、记录及测量均遵循EPPO标准PP1/150和PP1/275的规定。番茄作物上鳞翅目害虫的侵害在叶片和果实上都非常严重,这使我们能够在严重虫害条件下评估受试产品的功效。如果我们将叶片损害视为番茄潜叶蛾造成的虫道数量或海滨夜蛾造成的叶片侵蚀百分比,所有处理的值在统计学上均低于对照,但它们之间没有差异。但是,当以受损果实的百分比作为侵染阈值(在经济方面更具相关性)时,我们观察到各处理之间存在统计学上的显著差异。实际上,在两次评估日期中,氯虫苯甲酰胺 - 高效氯氟氰菊酯混合物处理在减少番茄潜叶蛾对番茄果实的侵害方面明显比甲氨基阿维菌素苯甲酸盐处理更有效。至于海滨夜蛾对果实的损害,在第一次评估时,处理2和处理5与对照相比显著降低了受害浆果的百分比,而处理3和处理4并未显著降低侵染率。在第二次评估时,未观察到四种不同处理之间存在统计学上的显著差异。由于海滨夜蛾对番茄果实的侵染远低于番茄潜叶蛾造成的侵染,四种杀虫剂处理的总体表现主要归因于对番茄潜叶蛾的防治效果。