Suppr超能文献

是否有证据指导实践?报告的与观察到的接触预防措施依从性:一项初步研究。

Is evidence guiding practice? Reported versus observed adherence to contact precautions: a pilot study.

机构信息

Vanderbilt University School of Nursing, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.

出版信息

Am J Infect Control. 2013 Nov;41(11):965-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2013.05.005. Epub 2013 Jul 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hospital-acquired infections are a major patient safety issue. We examined staff members' knowledge, attitudes, reported and observed adherence to guidelines, and perceptions of barriers to use of contact precautions.

METHODS

A survey and nonparticipant observation study was used to examine knowledge, attitudes, perceptions, and actual behavior of staff on 3 medical/surgical units at a 600-bed Magnet-designated academic medical center (MDAMC) and a 110-bed community medical center (CMC) in the southeastern United States.

RESULTS

Correct knowledge answers ranged from 75% (CMC) to 100% (MDAMC). CMC participants were less likely to perceive time as a barrier (5% vs 25%; P = .050); more MDAMC participants were motivated by supervisors' recognition (87% vs 33%; P = .001). No statistically significant differences existed between groups on reported behaviors. Upon observation, fewer CMC participants demonstrated 4 of 5 evidence-based contact precaution behaviors compared with MDMC participants (P < .001). Hand hygiene before glove application was similarly low at both sites.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a decade of focus on improving patient safety, low adherence to evidence-based practice guidelines for implementation of contact precautions remains. Ongoing efforts are needed both at the system and practitioner level to improve practice adherence.

摘要

背景

医院获得性感染是一个主要的患者安全问题。我们调查了医务人员的知识、态度、报告和观察到的对指南的遵守情况,以及对使用接触预防措施的障碍的看法。

方法

在东南部的一家 600 床位的 Magnet 指定的学术医疗中心(MDAMC)和一家 110 床位的社区医疗中心(CMC)的 3 个医疗/外科病房,使用调查和非参与观察研究来检查员工的知识、态度、看法和实际行为。

结果

正确的知识回答范围从 75%(CMC)到 100%(MDAMC)。CMC 的参与者认为时间是一个障碍的可能性较小(5%对 25%;P =.050);更多的 MDAMC 参与者受到主管认可的激励(87%对 33%;P =.001)。报告的行为在两组之间没有统计学上的显著差异。观察到的结果是,与 MDMC 参与者相比,较少的 CMC 参与者表现出 5 项基于证据的接触预防行为中的 4 项(P <.001)。在这两个地点,戴手套前进行手部卫生的情况也同样较低。

结论

尽管十年来一直关注提高患者安全,但接触预防措施实施的循证实践指南的低遵守率仍然存在。需要在系统和从业人员层面上持续努力,以提高实践的遵守率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验