Université Lille Nord-de-France, 59000 Lille, France.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013 Sep;99(5):549-53. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2013.03.026. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
Dislocation following total hip arthroplasty (THA) may require surgical revision, and is one of the most frequent causes for revision in national registers. The goals of this study were to determine the characteristics of revision THA for dislocation and identify the typical features of hips revised due to dislocation.
A prospective multicenter study (30 centers) was performed in first revision THA performed between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2011 (multiple revisions were excluded).
Two hundred nineteen (10.4%) of all first revisions (2153 cases in 2107 patients) were for dislocation, which was the fifth cause of revision. There were 135 men and 84 women, mean age 65.9 years old (24.3-92.4) at primary THA and 72.9 years old (31.9-98.8) at revision. Revision surgery was performed a mean 7.1 years (± 7.1) after primary THA. The predictive risk factors for dislocation were: a 22.2mm diameter femoral head (risk × 2.4), a posterolateral approach (risk × 1.7), older age (risk × 1.1), an elevated rim liner for primary THA (risk × 6.6). The use of a dual mobility cup did not influence the rate of revision for dislocation (8.8%) compared to the use of a flat rim liner (9.1%).
The 10.4% rate of revision of THA for dislocation seems markedly lower than the results in the literature both for frequency and ranking. The use of elevated rim or constrained liners designed to decrease the risk of dislocation does not improve results compared to standard liners.
Level IV, prospective prognostic study without a control group.
全髋关节置换术后(THA)脱位可能需要手术翻修,这是国家登记册中翻修最常见的原因之一。本研究的目的是确定翻修 THA 脱位的特点,并确定因脱位而翻修的髋关节的典型特征。
对 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2011 年 12 月 31 日期间(排除多次翻修)行首次翻修 THA 的前瞻性多中心研究(30 个中心)进行了研究。
在所有首次翻修(2107 例患者中的 2153 例)中,有 219 例(10.4%)是由于脱位,这是第五大翻修原因。初次 THA 时,男性 135 例,女性 84 例,平均年龄 65.9 岁(24.3-92.4),翻修时平均年龄 72.9 岁(31.9-98.8)。初次 THA 后平均 7.1 年(±7.1)进行翻修手术。脱位的预测危险因素包括:股骨头直径 22.2mm(风险×2.4)、后外侧入路(风险×1.7)、年龄较大(风险×1.1)、初次 THA 时使用高边缘衬垫(风险×6.6)。与使用平边衬垫相比,使用双动杯并不会影响因脱位而翻修的比率(8.8%)。
THA 因脱位而翻修的 10.4%的发生率似乎明显低于文献中报道的发生率和排名。使用旨在降低脱位风险的高边缘或约束衬垫并不能改善标准衬垫的结果。
四级,无对照组的前瞻性预后研究。