Institut des Sciences Analytiques, UMR CNRS 5280, Université de Lyon, 5 rue de la Doua, 69100 Villeurbanne, France.
J Chromatogr A. 2013 Sep 6;1306:27-36. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2013.07.048. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
In this second paper of a two-part series, on-line RPLC×HILIC is compared to on-line RPLC×RPLC through the separation of peptides. Our choices regarding the conditions are discussed. Injection effects and overloading effects are evaluated in both configurations. It is shown that whereas large volumes can be injected in the second dimension in RPLC×RPLC under HT-UHPLC conditions (>20% of the column dead volume), even small injection volumes (8% of the column the dead volume) have a detrimental effect on peak shapes in RPLC×HILIC. Advantages and limits of the two 2D-systems are compared through the 2D-separation of a tryptic digest of three proteins. A ten-fold gain in analysis time along with a significant gain in peak capacity are obtained with both systems compared to the most efficient one-dimensional separation of peptides recently published.
在这篇由两部分组成的系列论文的第二部分中,通过肽的分离比较了在线反相高效液相色谱-亲水相互作用色谱(RPLC×HILIC)与在线反相高效液相色谱-反相高效液相色谱(RPLC×RPLC)。讨论了我们在条件选择方面的决策。在这两种配置中都评估了进样效应和过载效应。结果表明,虽然在 HT-UHPLC 条件下(大于柱死体积的 20%)可以在第二维的 RPLC×RPLC 中注入较大体积(>20% of the column dead volume),但即使是较小的进样体积(8% of the column dead volume)也会对 RPLC×HILIC 中的峰形产生不利影响。通过对三种蛋白质的胰蛋白酶消化物的二维分离,比较了两种二维系统的优缺点和局限性。与最近发表的肽的最有效一维分离相比,两种系统都可以获得十倍的分析时间的提高和显著的峰容量的提高。