Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy & Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2013 Jul-Aug;53(4):373-81. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2013.12130.
To describe the relationship between state-level Aggregate Demand Index (ADI) data and market factors reflecting both supply and demand: unemployment rates, pharmacy graduates, community pharmacy prescription growth rates, and Medicare Part D.
Cross-sectional time series analysis using state-level data.
U.S. labor market for pharmacists, from 2001 to 2010.
Model ADI data for states (dependent variable) against five independent variables: previous year ADI, unemployment rates, pharmacy graduates, prescription growth rates, and Medicare Part D.
Significance and predictive ability of the model, sign of the variables studied, and R2.
In the two-way (state and time) fixed-effects model, all variables were significant and R2 was 0.79. Contributions to state-level ADIs were, in rank order, previous year ADI, unemployment rates, pharmacy graduates, and prescription growth rates. The model predicted 2010 ADI values for 44 of 51 states within ±10%. The model depicts the independent contributions of each variable for the short (∼1 year) and longer term. Although the nature of ADI data precludes quantitative predictions about the pharmacist job market, the model results show marketplace directions (up or down) and comparative impacts.
The model demonstrated that unemployment rates, pharmacy graduates, prescription growth rates, and Medicare Part D contributed significantly to state-level ADIs between 2001 and 2010. The relationships uncovered should be monitored and reexamined as new data emerge in order to anticipate the directions of the pharmacist job market.
描述州级总需求指数(ADI)数据与反映供需的市场因素之间的关系:失业率、药剂学毕业生、社区药房处方增长率和医疗保险 D 部分。
使用州级数据进行的横截面时间序列分析。
2001 年至 2010 年美国药剂师劳动力市场。
针对五个独立变量(州 ADI 数据为因变量)的模型 ADI 数据:前一年 ADI、失业率、药剂学毕业生、处方增长率和医疗保险 D 部分。
模型的显著性和预测能力、研究变量的符号和 R2。
在双向(州和时间)固定效应模型中,所有变量均具有统计学意义,R2 为 0.79。对州级 ADI 的贡献按降序排列分别为前一年 ADI、失业率、药剂学毕业生和处方增长率。该模型预测了 51 个州中的 44 个州 2010 年的 ADI 值,误差在±10%以内。该模型描绘了每个变量在短期(约 1 年)和长期的独立贡献。尽管 ADI 数据的性质排除了对药剂师就业市场进行定量预测的可能性,但模型结果显示了市场方向(向上或向下)和相对影响。
该模型表明,失业率、药剂学毕业生、处方增长率和医疗保险 D 部分在 2001 年至 2010 年间对州级 ADI 有显著贡献。应监测和重新检查所发现的关系,随着新数据的出现,以预测药剂师就业市场的方向。