University of Illinois at Chicago, 833 S. wood street, M/C 874 Chicago, IL, USA.
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2010 Jun;6(2):110-20. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2009.11.007.
Although the sustainability of rural pharmacy services is a concern of long standing, the rural marketplace is not monolithic. Enhanced understanding of different experiences, strengths, and potential weaknesses of rural chain and independent pharmacies could help inform health policy debates, legislation, and consideration of disparities and access. This study compared and contrasted experiences by pharmacists in chain and independent community pharmacies during Medicare Part D implementation.
The objective was to obtain and describe experiential narratives from rural Illinois pharmacists regarding the implementation of Medicare Part D. Similarities and differences experienced in chain and independent community pharmacies were examined, as well as pharmacists' perceptions about potential implications of the newly implemented Act on the accessibility of rural pharmacy care and services.
A semistructured qualitative research approach was used, involving focus groups and telephone interviews, to elicit the subjective experiences of rural Illinois pharmacists. Participants were selected through purposive sampling to include representative perspectives of independent and chain community pharmacists in rural areas across the state. Using a systematic, iterative coding process, recurrent themes were identified in 8 substantive categories.
Areas of similarity between the 2 groups included universal criticism of the initial implementation processes, but consensus belief that Medicare patients ultimately benefited if they did not have previous prescription drug coverage. Pharmacists in independent drugstores expressed more concern about their future viability. Corporate communications and infrastructure support were available in chain pharmacies and believed to present them with competitive advantages and a stronger long-term financial position.
The findings showed a disparate impact of Medicare Part D on the initial experiences and perceived viability of independent community pharmacies, in comparison with their chain pharmacy counterparts. The long-term implications of changing regulatory environments and customers' pharmacy needs in underserved communities should be carefully considered and monitored.
尽管农村药店服务的可持续性是一个长期存在的问题,但农村市场并非铁板一块。增强对农村连锁药店和独立药店不同经验、优势和潜在弱点的理解,有助于为卫生政策辩论、立法以及考虑差异和获取途径提供信息。本研究比较和对比了农村连锁药店和独立社区药店药剂师在医疗保险处方药部分(Medicare Part D)实施过程中的经验。
本研究旨在从农村伊利诺伊州药剂师那里获得并描述他们在实施医疗保险处方药部分(Medicare Part D)方面的经验。考察了连锁和独立社区药店的相似和不同之处,以及药剂师对新实施的法案对农村药店护理和服务可及性的潜在影响的看法。
采用半结构化定性研究方法,通过焦点小组和电话访谈,引出农村伊利诺伊州药剂师的主观经验。通过目的性抽样选择参与者,以包括该州农村地区连锁和独立社区药店的代表性观点。通过系统的、迭代的编码过程,确定了 8 个实质性类别中的反复出现的主题。
这两组之间的相似之处包括对初始实施过程的普遍批评,但一致认为,如果 Medicare 患者以前没有处方药物覆盖,他们最终会受益。独立药店的药剂师对他们未来的生存能力表示更多担忧。连锁药店提供了企业沟通和基础设施支持,被认为为他们提供了竞争优势和更强的长期财务地位。
研究结果表明,与连锁药店相比,医疗保险处方药部分对独立社区药店的初始经验和生存能力产生了明显不同的影响。应该仔细考虑和监测不断变化的监管环境和服务不足社区客户的药房需求对长期的影响。