Suppr超能文献

用于治疗囊性纤维化相关糖尿病的胰岛素及口服药物。

Insulin and oral agents for managing cystic fibrosis-related diabetes.

作者信息

Onady Gary M, Stolfi Adrienne

机构信息

Boonshoft School of Medicine, Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 26(7):CD004730. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004730.pub3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Cystic Fibrosis Foundation recommends both short-term and long-acting insulin therapy when cystic fibrosis-related diabetes has been diagnosed. Diagnosis is based on: an elevated fasting blood glucose level greater than 6.94 mmol/liter (125 mg/deciliter); or symptomatic diabetes for random glucose levels greater than 11.11 mmol/liter (200 mg/deciliter); or glycated hemoglobin levels of at least 6.5%.

OBJECTIVES

To establish the effectiveness of agents for managing diabetes in people with cystic fibrosis in relation to blood sugar levels, lung function and weight management.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register comprising references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and handsearches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings. We also handsearched abstracts from pulmonary symposia and the North American Cystic Fibrosis Conferences.Date of the most recent search of the Group's Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register: 22 July 2013.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials comparing all methods of diabetes therapy in people with diagnosed cystic fibrosis-related diabetes.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias in the included studies.

MAIN RESULTS

The searches identified 19 studies (28 references). Three studies (107 participants) are included: one comparing insulin with oral repaglinide and no medication (short-term single-center study of seven patients with cystic fibrosis-related diabetes and normal fasting glucose); one comparing insulin with oral repaglinide and placebo (long-term multi-center study with 81 patients, 61 of whom had cystic fibrosis-related diabetes); and one 12-week single-center study comparing the long-acting insulin, glargine to short-term neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin. The long-term trial of insulin and repaglinide demonstrated no significant difference between treatments. In the smaller study comparing insulin and oral repaglinide, there were two incidents of significant hypoglycemia in the insulin group compared to one in the repaglinide group; in the larger study there were five incidents of significant hypoglycemia in the insulin group and six in the repaglinide group. The study comparing glargine to neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin demonstrated a statistically non-significant weight increase in with longer-acting insulin given at bedtime and reported a mean of six hypoglycemia events in the glargine group compared to five events in the neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin group. None of the three included studies were powered to show a significant improvement in lung function.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This review has not found any significant conclusive evidence that long-acting insulins, short-acting insulins or oral hypoglycemic agents have a distinct advantage over one another in controlling hyperglycemia or clinical outcomes associated with cystic fibrosis-related diabetes. While some cystic fibrosis centers use oral medications to help control diabetes, the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (USA) clinical practice guidelines support the use of insulin therapy and this remains the most widely-used treatment method. Randomized controlled trials specifically related to controlling diabetes with this impact on the course of pulmonary disease process in cystic fibrosis continue to be a high priority.There is no demonstrated advantage yet established for using oral hypoglycemic agents over insulin, and further studies need to be evaluated to establish whether there is clear benefit for using hypoglycemic agents. Agents that potentiate insulin action, especially agents with additional anti-inflammatory potential should be further investigated to see if there may be a clinical advantage to adding these medications to insulin as adjuvant therapy.

摘要

背景

囊性纤维化基金会建议,一旦诊断出患有囊性纤维化相关糖尿病,应同时采用短期和长效胰岛素疗法。诊断依据为:空腹血糖水平高于6.94毫摩尔/升(125毫克/分升);或随机血糖水平高于11.11毫摩尔/升(200毫克/分升)且有糖尿病症状;或糖化血红蛋白水平至少为6.5%。

目的

确定治疗囊性纤维化患者糖尿病的药物在控制血糖水平、肺功能和体重管理方面的有效性。

检索方法

我们检索了Cochrane囊性纤维化和遗传疾病小组试验注册库,该注册库包含通过全面电子数据库检索、相关期刊手工检索以及会议论文摘要书籍手工检索确定的参考文献。我们还手工检索了肺部研讨会和北美囊性纤维化会议的摘要。小组囊性纤维化试验注册库的最新检索日期为2013年7月22日。

选择标准

比较所有已诊断的囊性纤维化相关糖尿病患者糖尿病治疗方法的随机对照试验。

数据收集与分析

两位作者独立提取数据并评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。

主要结果

检索到19项研究(28篇参考文献)。纳入3项研究(107名参与者):一项比较胰岛素与口服瑞格列奈以及不进行药物治疗(对7名空腹血糖正常的囊性纤维化相关糖尿病患者进行的短期单中心研究);一项比较胰岛素与口服瑞格列奈以及安慰剂(对81名患者进行的长期多中心研究,其中61名患有囊性纤维化相关糖尿病);一项为期12周的单中心研究,比较长效胰岛素甘精胰岛素与短期中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素。胰岛素和瑞格列奈的长期试验表明治疗之间无显著差异。在比较胰岛素和口服瑞格列奈的较小研究中,胰岛素组有2例严重低血糖事件,而瑞格列奈组有1例;在较大研究中,胰岛素组有5例严重低血糖事件,瑞格列奈组有6例。比较甘精胰岛素与中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素的研究表明,睡前使用长效胰岛素体重有统计学上无显著意义的增加,甘精胰岛素组平均有6次低血糖事件,而中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素组有5次。纳入的3项研究均未设定足够的样本量以显示肺功能有显著改善。

作者结论

本综述未发现任何确凿证据表明长效胰岛素、短效胰岛素或口服降糖药在控制与囊性纤维化相关糖尿病的高血糖或临床结局方面具有明显优势。虽然一些囊性纤维化中心使用口服药物来帮助控制糖尿病,但美国囊性纤维化基金会的临床实践指南支持使用胰岛素疗法,这仍然是最广泛使用的治疗方法。专门针对控制糖尿病且对囊性纤维化肺部疾病进程有影响的随机对照试验仍然是高度优先事项。目前尚未证明口服降糖药比胰岛素有优势,需要进一步研究以确定使用降糖药是否有明确益处。增强胰岛素作用的药物,特别是具有额外抗炎潜力的药物,应进一步研究,以确定将这些药物作为辅助治疗添加到胰岛素中是否可能具有临床优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验