Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jan 1;83(1):27-36. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25135. Epub 2013 Oct 16.
Numerous definitions have been proposed for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction (MI) after coronary revascularization. The universal definition for MI designates post procedural biomarker thresholds for defining percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-related MI (type 4a) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)-related MI (type 5) which are of uncertain prognostic importance. In addition, for both MI types cTn is recommended as the biomarker of choice, the prognostic significance of which is less well validated than CK-MB. Widespread adoption of a MI definition not clearly linked to subsequent adverse events such as mortality or heart failure may have serious consequences for the appropriate assessment of devices and therapies, may affect clinical care pathways, and may result in misinterpretation of physician competence. Rather than employing an MI definition sensitive for small degrees of myonecrosis (the occurrence of which, based on contemporary large-scale studies, are unlikely to have important clinical consequences), it is instead recommended that a threshold level of biomarker elevation which has been strongly linked to subsequent adverse events in clinical studies be used to define a "clinically relevant MI." The present document introduces a new definition for "clinically relevant MI" after coronary revascularization (PCI or CABG) which is applicable for use in clinical trials, patient care, and quality outcomes assessment.
已经提出了许多用于冠状动脉血运重建后心肌梗死 (MI) 的诊断定义。MI 的通用定义指定了经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 (PCI) 相关 MI (4a 型) 和冠状动脉旁路移植术 (CABG) 相关 MI (5 型) 的术后生物标志物阈值,这些阈值对预后的重要性尚不确定。此外,对于这两种 MI 类型,均推荐使用肌钙蛋白作为首选生物标志物,但其预后意义的验证不如 CK-MB 充分。广泛采用与死亡率或心力衰竭等后续不良事件无明确关联的 MI 定义,可能会对设备和治疗的适当评估产生严重后果,可能会影响临床护理途径,并可能导致对医生能力的误解。建议使用与临床研究中后续不良事件密切相关的生物标志物升高阈值来定义“临床相关 MI”,而不是采用对小程度的心肌坏死敏感的 MI 定义(基于当代大规模研究,发生这种情况不太可能产生重要的临床后果)。本文件提出了一种新的冠状动脉血运重建(PCI 或 CABG)后“临床相关 MI”的定义,适用于临床试验、患者护理和质量结果评估。