• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多中心、国际、随机、2 年、平行分组研究,旨在评估血管内超声指导的 PCI 与定性血管造影指导的 PCI 在非保护左主干冠状动脉(ULMCA)疾病中的优越性:OPTIMAL 试验研究方案。

A multi-center, international, randomized, 2-year, parallel-group study to assess the superiority of IVUS-guided PCI versus qualitative angio-guided PCI in unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease: Study protocol for OPTIMAL trial.

机构信息

Heart Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Coronary Revascularisation Unit, IRCCS Policlinico S. Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Jan 7;17(1):e0260770. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260770. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0260770
PMID:34995276
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8740965/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is used increasingly for revascularization of unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease. Observational studies and subgroup analyses from clinical trials, have suggested a possible benefit from the use of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance when performing unprotected LMCA PCI. However, the value of imaging with IVUS has never been proven in an appropriately powered randomized clinical trial. The OPtimizaTIon of Left MAin PCI With IntravascuLar Ultrasound (OPTIMAL) trial has been designed to establish whether IVUS-guided PCI optimization on LMCA is associated with superior clinical outcomes when compared with standard qualitative angiography-guided PCI.

METHODS

The OPTIMAL trial is a randomized, multicenter, international study designed to enroll a total of 800 patients undergoing PCI for unprotected LMCA disease. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to IVUS-guided PCI versus angiogram-guided PCI. In patients allocated to the angiogram-guided arm, use of IVUS is discouraged, unless there are safety concerns. In patients allocated to the IVUS guidance arm, pre-procedural IVUS assessment is highly recommended, whilst post-procedural IVUS assessment is mandatory to confirm appropriate stenting result and/or to guide stent result optimization, according to predefined criteria. Patients will be followed up to 2 years after the index procedure. The primary outcome measure is the Academic Research Consortium (ARC) patient-oriented composite endpoint (PoCE) which includes all-cause death, any stroke, any myocardial infarction and any repeat revascularization at 2 years follow-up.

DISCUSSION

The OPTIMAL trial aims to provide definitive evidence about the clinical impact of IVUS-guidance during PCI to an unprotected LMCA. It is anticipated by the investigators, that an IVUS-guided strategy will be associated with less clinical events compared to a strategy guided by angiogram alone.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04111770. Registered on October 1, 2019.

摘要

背景

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)越来越多地用于治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉(LMCA)疾病的血运重建。观察性研究和临床试验的亚组分析表明,在进行无保护 LMCA PCI 时,使用血管内超声(IVUS)指导可能有益。然而,IVUS 成像的价值从未在一项适当功率的随机临床试验中得到证实。OPtimizaTIon of Left MAin PCI With IntravascuLar Ultrasound(OPTIMAL)试验旨在确定与标准定性血管造影指导 PCI 相比,LMCA 上的 IVUS 指导 PCI 优化是否与更好的临床结果相关。

方法

OPTIMAL 试验是一项随机、多中心、国际研究,旨在招募 800 名接受 PCI 治疗的无保护 LMCA 疾病患者。患者将以 1:1 的比例随机分为 IVUS 指导 PCI 与血管造影指导 PCI。在分配给血管造影指导组的患者中,除非存在安全问题,否则不鼓励使用 IVUS。在分配到 IVUS 指导臂的患者中,强烈建议进行术前 IVUS 评估,而术后 IVUS 评估是强制性的,以根据预设标准确认适当的支架置入结果和/或指导支架结果优化。患者将在指数手术后 2 年内进行随访。主要终点是学术研究联合会(ARC)以患者为导向的复合终点(PoCE),包括 2 年随访时的全因死亡、任何卒中和任何心肌梗死和任何再次血运重建。

讨论

OPTIMAL 试验旨在提供关于在无保护 LMCA 中进行 PCI 时 IVUS 指导的临床影响的明确证据。研究人员预计,与仅接受血管造影指导的策略相比,IVUS 指导策略将与更少的临床事件相关。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT04111770。于 2019 年 10 月 1 日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21b2/8740965/f736b33bb02d/pone.0260770.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21b2/8740965/1e650fe0feca/pone.0260770.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21b2/8740965/09b564b0e356/pone.0260770.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21b2/8740965/f736b33bb02d/pone.0260770.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21b2/8740965/1e650fe0feca/pone.0260770.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21b2/8740965/09b564b0e356/pone.0260770.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21b2/8740965/f736b33bb02d/pone.0260770.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
A multi-center, international, randomized, 2-year, parallel-group study to assess the superiority of IVUS-guided PCI versus qualitative angio-guided PCI in unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease: Study protocol for OPTIMAL trial.多中心、国际、随机、2 年、平行分组研究,旨在评估血管内超声指导的 PCI 与定性血管造影指导的 PCI 在非保护左主干冠状动脉(ULMCA)疾病中的优越性:OPTIMAL 试验研究方案。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 7;17(1):e0260770. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260770. eCollection 2022.
2
Optical coherence tomography compared with intravascular ultrasound and with angiography to guide coronary stent implantation (ILUMIEN III: OPTIMIZE PCI): a randomised controlled trial.光学相干断层成像术与血管内超声和血管造影指导冠状动脉支架置入术的比较(ILUMIEN III:OPTIMIZE PCI):一项随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2016 Nov 26;388(10060):2618-2628. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31922-5. Epub 2016 Oct 30.
3
Comparison of optical coherence tomography-guided versus intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: Rationale and design of a randomized, controlled OCTIVUS trial.光学相干断层扫描引导与血管内超声引导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较:随机、对照 OCTIVUS 试验的原理和设计。
Am Heart J. 2020 Oct;228:72-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.08.003. Epub 2020 Aug 8.
4
Comparison of one-month versus twelve-month dual antiplatelet therapy after implantation of drug-eluting stents guided by either intravascular ultrasound or angiography in patients with acute coronary syndrome: rationale and design of prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled IVUS-ACS and ULTIMATE-DAPT trial.比较血管内超声或血管造影指导下急性冠脉综合征患者药物洗脱支架植入术后 1 个月与 12 个月双联抗血小板治疗:前瞻性、多中心、随机、对照 IVUS-ACS 和 ULTIMATE-DAPT 试验的原理和设计。
Am Heart J. 2021 Jun;236:49-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.02.014. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
5
Three-dimensional optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary intervention for the left main coronary artery.三维光学相干断层成像术与血管内超声在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗左主干冠状动脉中的应用。
Heart Vessels. 2021 May;36(5):630-637. doi: 10.1007/s00380-020-01742-6. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
6
Comparison Between Optical Frequency Domain Imaging and Intravascular Ultrasound for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Guidance in Biolimus A9-Eluting Stent Implantation: A Randomized MISTIC-1 Non-Inferiority Trial.光学相干断层成像与血管内超声在生物可吸收支架中应用于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较:一项随机 MISTIC-1 非劣效性试验
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Nov;13(11):e009314. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009314. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
7
Three-Year Major Clinical Outcomes of Angiography-Guided Single Stenting Technique in Non-Complex Left Main Coronary Artery Diseases.血管造影引导下单支架置入技术治疗非复杂性左主干冠状动脉疾病的三年主要临床结局
Int Heart J. 2017 Oct 12;58(5):704-713. doi: 10.1536/ihj.17-115. Epub 2017 Sep 30.
8
Intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with unprotected left main coronary artery lesions.血管内超声引导下经皮冠状动脉介入治疗无保护左主干病变。
Coron Artery Dis. 2024 May 1;35(3):171-178. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000001356. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
9
Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided or Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The OCTIVUS Randomized Clinical Trial.光学相干断层成像引导或血管内超声引导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:OCTIVUS 随机临床试验。
Circulation. 2023 Oct 17;148(16):1195-1206. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.066429. Epub 2023 Aug 27.
10
Guiding Intervention for Complex Coronary Lesions by Optical Coherence Tomography or Intravascular Ultrasound.光学相干断层成像术或血管内超声引导下的复杂冠状动脉病变介入治疗。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024 Jan 23;83(3):401-413. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.10.017. Epub 2023 Oct 23.

引用本文的文献

1
IVUS has more robust data than OCT for PCI guidance: PROS and CONS.在PCI指导方面,血管内超声(IVUS)比光学相干断层扫描(OCT)有更可靠的数据:优点与缺点。
EuroIntervention. 2024 Sep 16;20(18):e1132-e1135. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00028.
2
Innovations in Intracoronary Imaging: Present Clinical Practices and Future Outlooks.冠状动脉内成像的创新:当前临床实践与未来展望。
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 12;13(14):4086. doi: 10.3390/jcm13144086.
3
Intravascular Imaging-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term outcomes in the management of left main disease: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.左主干病变管理的长期结局:随机对照试验的最新荟萃分析
Hellenic J Cardiol. 2021 Jan-Feb;62(1):87-88. doi: 10.1016/j.hjc.2020.04.006. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
2
Ten-Year Outcomes After Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Left Main Coronary Disease: Extended Follow-Up of the PRECOMBAT Trial.药物洗脱支架与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干病变的 10 年结果:PRECOMBAT 试验的扩展随访。
Circulation. 2020 May 5;141(18):1437-1446. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.046039. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
3
血管内影像学指导与血管造影指导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较:随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Jan 16;13(2):e031111. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.031111. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
4
Percutaneous Treatment of Left Main Disease: A Review of Current Status.经皮治疗左主干病变:现状综述
J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 28;12(15):4972. doi: 10.3390/jcm12154972.
Intravascular ultrasound to guide left main stem intervention: a NOBLE trial substudy.
血管内超声指导左主干介入治疗:NOBLE 试验子研究。
EuroIntervention. 2020 Jun 25;16(3):201-209. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-01003.
4
Mortality after drug-eluting stents vs. coronary artery bypass grafting for left main coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.药物洗脱支架与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干冠状动脉疾病的死亡率:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2020 Sep 7;41(34):3228-3235. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa135.
5
Outcomes of predefined optimisation criteria for intravascular ultrasound guidance of left main stenting.血管内超声指导左主干支架置入术的预设优化标准的结果。
EuroIntervention. 2020 Jun 25;16(3):210-217. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-01057.
6
Five-Year Outcomes after PCI or CABG for Left Main Coronary Disease.左主干冠状动脉疾病经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术后 5 年的结果。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Nov 7;381(19):1820-1830. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1909406. Epub 2019 Sep 28.
7
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease: 10-year follow-up of the multicentre randomised controlled SYNTAX trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗三血管病变或左主干病变患者:多中心随机对照 SYNTAX 试验 10 年随访结果。
Lancet. 2019 Oct 12;394(10206):1325-1334. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31997-X. Epub 2019 Sep 2.
8
Management of Calcific Coronary Artery Lesions: Is it Time to Change Our Interventional Therapeutic Approach?钙化冠状动脉病变的管理:是否是时候改变我们的介入治疗方法了?
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Aug 12;12(15):1465-1478. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.03.038.
9
Critical Appraisal of Contemporary Clinical Endpoint Definitions in Coronary Intervention Trials: A Guidance Document.当代冠状动脉介入治疗临床试验终点定义的批判性评价:指导文件。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 May 13;12(9):805-819. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.12.031.
10
2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization.2018年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会心肌血运重建指南。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Jan 7;40(2):87-165. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394.