Institut Gustave Roussy; Villejuif, France ; Université Paris-Sud/Paris XI; Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France ; INSERM, U848; Villejuif, France.
Oncoimmunology. 2013 Jun 1;2(6):e24612. doi: 10.4161/onci.24612. Epub 2013 Apr 16.
Oncolytic virotherapy is emerging as a promising approach for the treatment of several neoplasms. The term "oncolytic viruses" is generally employed to indicate naturally occurring or genetically engineered attenuated viral particles that cause the demise of malignant cells while sparing their non-transformed counterparts. From a conceptual standpoint, oncolytic viruses differ from so-called "oncotropic viruses" in that only the former are able to kill cancer cells, even though both display a preferential tropism for malignant tissues. Of note, such a specificity can originate at several different steps of the viral cycle, including the entry of virions (transductional specificity) as well as their intracellular survival and replication (post-transcriptional and transcriptional specificity). During the past two decades, a large array of replication-competent and replication-incompetent oncolytic viruses has been developed and engineered to express gene products that would specifically promote the death of infected (cancer) cells. However, contrarily to long-standing beliefs, the antineoplastic activity of oncolytic viruses is not a mere consequence of the cytopathic effect, i.e., the lethal outcome of an intense, productive viral infection, but rather involves the elicitation of an antitumor immune response. In line with this notion, oncolytic viruses genetically modified to drive the local production of immunostimulatory cytokines exert more robust therapeutic effects than their non-engineered counterparts. Moreover, the efficacy of oncolytic virotherapy is significantly improved by some extent of initial immunosuppression (facilitating viral replication and spread) followed by the administration of immunostimulatory molecules (boosting antitumor immune responses). In this Trial Watch, we will discuss the results of recent clinical trials that have evaluated/are evaluating the safety and antineoplastic potential of oncolytic virotherapy.
溶瘤病毒治疗学作为一种有前途的治疗方法,正在被广泛应用于多种肿瘤的治疗。溶瘤病毒这一术语通常被用于指代天然存在或经过基因工程改造的减毒病毒颗粒,这些病毒颗粒可以特异性杀伤肿瘤细胞而不损伤正常细胞。从概念上讲,溶瘤病毒与所谓的“嗜瘤病毒”不同,只有前者能够杀伤肿瘤细胞,尽管两者都显示出对恶性组织的优先趋向性。值得注意的是,这种特异性可以起源于病毒周期的几个不同步骤,包括病毒粒子的进入(转导特异性)以及它们在细胞内的存活和复制(转录后和转录特异性)。在过去的二十年中,已经开发和设计了大量具有复制能力和复制缺陷的溶瘤病毒,以表达能够特异性促进受感染(癌症)细胞死亡的基因产物。然而,与长期以来的观点相反,溶瘤病毒的抗肿瘤活性并不是单纯由细胞病变效应引起的,即强烈、有生产力的病毒感染导致的致命结果,而是涉及到抗肿瘤免疫反应的诱导。根据这一观点,经过基因修饰以驱动局部产生免疫刺激细胞因子的溶瘤病毒比未修饰的病毒具有更强的治疗效果。此外,通过一定程度的初始免疫抑制(促进病毒复制和传播)然后给予免疫刺激分子(增强抗肿瘤免疫反应),可以在一定程度上提高溶瘤病毒治疗的疗效。在本次临床试验观察中,我们将讨论最近评估/正在评估溶瘤病毒治疗的安全性和抗肿瘤潜力的临床试验结果。