Institute for Infectious Disease and Endemic Disease Control, Beijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control (CDC), Beijing Research Center for Preventive Medicine, Capital Medical University School of Public Health, No,16 He Pingli Middle Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing 100013, China.
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2013 Jul 30;12:18. doi: 10.1186/1476-0711-12-18.
Streptococcal superantigens (SAgs) are the major virulence factors of infection in humans for group A Streptococcus (GAS) bacteria. A panel consisting of seven duplex real-time PCR assays was developed to simultaneously detect 13 streptococcal SAgs and one internal control which may be important in the control of GAS-mediated diseases.
Primer and probe sequences were selected based on the highly conserved region from an alignment of nucleotide sequences of the 13 streptococcal SAgs. The reaction conditions of the duplex real-time PCR were optimized and the specificity of the duplex assays was evaluated using SAg positive strains. The limit of detection of the duplex assays was determined by using 10-fold serial dilutions of the DNA of 13 streptococcal SAgs and compared to a conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method for evaluating the duplex assays sensitivity.
Using the duplex assays, we were able to differentiate between 13 SAgs from Streptococcus strains and other non-Streptococcus bacteria without cross-reaction. On the other hand, the limit of detection of the duplex assays was at least one or two log dilutions lower than that of the conventional PCR.
The panel was highly specific (100%) and the limit of detection of these duplex groups was at least ten times lower than that obtained by using a conventional PCR method.
链球菌超抗原 (SAg) 是 A 群链球菌 (GAS) 细菌感染的主要毒力因子。本研究开发了一个由七个双重实时 PCR 检测组成的检测面板,可同时检测 13 种链球菌 SAg 和一种内部对照,这可能对 GAS 介导疾病的控制具有重要意义。
根据 13 种链球菌 SAg 的核苷酸序列比对,选择高度保守区域的引物和探针序列。优化了双重实时 PCR 的反应条件,并使用 SAg 阳性菌株评估了双重检测的特异性。通过使用 10 倍系列稀释的 13 种链球菌 SAg 的 DNA 来确定双重检测的检测限,并与传统的聚合酶链反应 (PCR) 方法比较,以评估双重检测的灵敏度。
使用双重检测,我们能够区分来自链球菌菌株和其他非链球菌细菌的 13 种 SAg,而不会发生交叉反应。另一方面,双重检测的检测限至少比传统 PCR 低一到两个对数稀释度。
该检测面板具有高度特异性(100%),与传统 PCR 方法相比,这些双重检测的检测限至少低十倍。