Elliott Sue, Shafiq Ayad
OphthalmologyDepartment, Salisbury Health Care NHS Trust, Salisbury, UK.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 29;2013(7):CD004917. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004917.pub3.
Infantile esotropia (IE) is the inward deviation of the eye. Various aspects of the clinical management of IE are unclear; mainly, the most effective type of intervention and the age at intervention.
The objective of this review was to assess the effectiveness of various surgical and non-surgical interventions for IE and to determine the significance of age at treatment with respect to outcome.
We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Trials Register) (The Cochrane Library 2013, Issue 5), Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid MEDLINE In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE Daily, Ovid OLDMEDLINE, (January 1950 to June 2013), EMBASE (January 1980 to June 2013), Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences (LILACS) (January 1982 to June 2013), the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT) (www.controlled-trials.com), ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov) and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (www.who.int/ictrp/search/en). We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic searches for trials. We last searched the electronic databases on 10 June 2013. We manually searched the conference proceedings of the European Strabismological Association (ESA) (1975 to 1997, 1999 to 2002), International Strabismological Association (ISA) (1994) and American Academy of Paediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus meeting (AAPOS) (1995 to 2003). Efforts were made to contact researchers who are active in the field for information about further published or unpublished studies.
We included randomised trials comparing any surgical or non-surgical intervention for infantile esotropia.
Each review author independently assessed study abstracts identified from the electronic and manual searches.
No studies were found that met our selection criteria and therefore none were included for analysis.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The main body of literature on interventions for IE are either retrospective studies or prospective cohort studies. It has not been possible through this review to resolve the controversies regarding type of surgery, non-surgical intervention and age of intervention. There is clearly a need for good quality trials to be conducted in these areas to improve the evidence base for the management of IE.
婴儿内斜视(IE)是眼睛向内偏斜。婴儿内斜视临床管理的各个方面尚不清楚;主要是最有效的干预类型和干预年龄。
本综述的目的是评估各种手术和非手术干预对婴儿内斜视的有效性,并确定治疗年龄对治疗结果的意义。
我们检索了Cochrane系统评价数据库(CENTRAL)(其中包含Cochrane眼科和视力组试验注册库)(《Cochrane图书馆》2013年第5期)、Ovid MEDLINE、Ovid MEDLINE在研及其他未索引引文、Ovid MEDLINE每日更新、Ovid OLDMEDLINE(1950年1月至2013年6月)、EMBASE(1980年1月至2013年6月)、拉丁美洲和加勒比地区健康科学文献数据库(LILACS)(1982年1月至2013年6月)、对照试验元注册库(mRCT)(www.controlled-trials.com)、ClinicalTrials.gov(www.clinicaltrials.gov)以及世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台(ICTRP)(www.who.int/ictrp/search/en)。在电子检索试验时,我们未使用任何日期或语言限制。我们最近一次检索电子数据库的时间是2013年6月10日。我们手动检索了欧洲斜视协会(ESA)(1975年至1997年、1999年至2002年)、国际斜视协会(ISA)(1994年)以及美国儿科学会眼科与斜视会议(AAPOS)(1995年至2003年)的会议论文集。我们努力联系该领域的活跃研究人员,以获取有关进一步已发表或未发表研究的信息。
我们纳入了比较婴儿内斜视任何手术或非手术干预的随机试验。
每位综述作者独立评估从电子检索和手动检索中识别出的研究摘要。
未发现符合我们选择标准的研究,因此没有纳入分析的研究。
关于婴儿内斜视干预的文献主体要么是回顾性研究,要么是前瞻性队列研究。通过本综述无法解决关于手术类型、非手术干预和干预年龄的争议。显然需要在这些领域开展高质量试验,以改善婴儿内斜视管理的证据基础。