Inselspital, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland.
Foot Ankle Int. 2013 Sep;34(9):1190-7. doi: 10.1177/1071100713500473. Epub 2013 Jul 29.
A fixed cavovarus foot deformity can be associated with anteromedial ankle arthrosis due to elevated medial joint contact stresses. Supramalleolar valgus osteotomies (SMOT) and lateralizing calcaneal osteotomies (LCOT) are commonly used to treat symptoms by redistributing joint contact forces. In a cavovarus model, the effects of SMOT and LCOT on the lateralization of the center of force (COF) and reduction of the peak pressure in the ankle joint were compared.
A previously published cavovarus model with fixed hindfoot varus was simulated in 10 cadaver specimens. Closing wedge supramalleolar valgus osteotomies 3 cm above the ankle joint level (6 and 11 degrees) and lateral sliding calcaneal osteotomies (5 and 10 mm displacement) were analyzed at 300 N axial static load (half body weight). The COF migration and peak pressure decrease in the ankle were recorded using high-resolution TekScan pressure sensors.
A significant lateral COF shift was observed for each osteotomy: 2.1 mm for the 6 degrees (P = .014) and 2.3 mm for the 11 degrees SMOT (P = .010). The 5 mm LCOT led to a lateral shift of 2.0 mm (P = .042) and the 10 mm LCOT to a shift of 3.0 mm (P = .006). Comparing the different osteotomies among themselves no significant differences were recorded. No significant anteroposterior COF shift was seen. A significant peak pressure reduction was recorded for each osteotomy: The SMOT led to a reduction of 29% (P = .033) for the 6 degrees and 47% (P = .003) for the 11 degrees osteotomy, and the LCOT to a reduction of 41% (P = .003) for the 5 mm and 49% (P = .002) for the 10 mm osteotomy. Similar to the COF lateralization no significant differences between the osteotomies were seen.
LCOT and SMOT significantly reduced anteromedial ankle joint contact stresses in this cavovarus model. The unloading effects of both osteotomies were equivalent. More correction did not lead to significantly more lateralization of the COF or more reduction of peak pressure but a trend was seen.
In patients with fixed cavovarus feet, both SMOT and LCOT provided equally good redistribution of elevated ankle joint contact forces. Increasing the amount of displacement did not seem to equally improve the joint pressures. The site of osteotomy could therefore be chosen on the basis of surgeon's preference, simplicity, or local factors in case of more complex reconstructions.
固定的内翻足畸形可由于内侧关节接触压力升高而与前内侧踝关节关节炎相关。距下外展截骨术(SMOT)和跟骨外侧滑动截骨术(LCOT)常用于通过重新分布关节接触力来治疗症状。在一个内翻足模型中,比较了 SMOT 和 LCOT 对力中心(COF)外侧化和踝关节峰值压力降低的影响。
模拟了先前发表的具有固定后足内翻的内翻足模型,共在 10 个尸体标本上进行研究。在距踝关节水平 3cm 处进行闭合楔形距下外展截骨术(6 度和 11 度)和跟骨外侧滑动截骨术(5mm 和 10mm 位移),在 300N 轴向静态负荷(半体重)下进行分析。使用高分辨率 TekScan 压力传感器记录 COF 在踝关节处的迁移和峰值压力降低。
每种截骨术都观察到明显的 COF 外侧偏移:6 度 SMOT 为 2.1mm(P =.014),11 度 SMOT 为 2.3mm(P =.010)。5mm LCOT 导致 2.0mm 的外侧偏移(P =.042),而 10mm LCOT 导致 3.0mm 的外侧偏移(P =.006)。比较不同截骨术之间,没有记录到显著差异。没有明显的前后 COF 偏移。每种截骨术都记录到显著的峰值压力降低:6 度 SMOT 降低 29%(P =.033),11 度 SMOT 降低 47%(P =.003),5mm LCOT 降低 41%(P =.003),10mm LCOT 降低 49%(P =.002)。与 COF 外侧化一样,截骨术之间也没有观察到显著差异。
在这个内翻足模型中,LCOT 和 SMOT 显著降低了前内侧踝关节关节接触应力。两种截骨术的卸载效果相当。更多的矫正并没有导致 COF 的明显外侧化或峰值压力的明显降低,但有这种趋势。
在患有固定性内翻足的患者中,SMOT 和 LCOT 同样可以很好地重新分配升高的踝关节关节接触力。增加位移量似乎并没有同等程度地改善关节压力。因此,如果需要更复杂的重建,截骨术的部位可以根据外科医生的偏好、手术的简单性或局部因素来选择。