1 Cognitive Brain Research Unit, Cognitive Science, Institute of Behavioural Sciences, University of Helsinki Helsinki, Finland ; 2 Finnish Centre of Excellence in Interdisciplinary Music Research, University of Jyväskylä Jyväskylä, Finland.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Jul 26;7:401. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00401. eCollection 2013.
To err is human, and hence even professional musicians make errors occasionally during their performances. This paper summarizes recent work investigating error monitoring in musicians, i.e., the processes and their neural correlates associated with the monitoring of ongoing actions and the detection of deviations from intended sounds. Electroencephalography (EEG) studies reported an early component of the event-related potential (ERP) occurring before the onsets of pitch errors. This component, which can be altered in musicians with focal dystonia, likely reflects processes of error detection and/or error compensation, i.e., attempts to cancel the undesired sensory consequence (a wrong tone) a musician is about to perceive. Thus, auditory feedback seems not to be a prerequisite for error detection, consistent with previous behavioral results. In contrast, when auditory feedback is externally manipulated and thus unexpected, motor performance can be severely distorted, although not all feedback alterations result in performance impairments. Recent studies investigating the neural correlates of feedback processing showed that unexpected feedback elicits an ERP component after note onsets, which shows larger amplitudes during music performance than during mere perception of the same musical sequences. Hence, these results stress the role of motor actions for the processing of auditory information. Furthermore, recent methodological advances like the combination of 3D motion capture techniques with EEG will be discussed. Such combinations of different measures can potentially help to disentangle the roles of different feedback types such as proprioceptive and auditory feedback, and in general to derive at a better understanding of the complex interactions between the motor and auditory domain during error monitoring. Finally, outstanding questions and future directions in this context will be discussed.
人非圣贤,孰能无过,即使是专业的音乐家在演奏过程中也偶尔会犯错。本文总结了近期关于音乐家错误监控的研究工作,即与监控正在进行的动作和检测与预期声音的偏差相关的过程及其神经关联。脑电图(EEG)研究报告了事件相关电位(ERP)的早期成分,该成分发生在音高错误出现之前。在有局灶性肌张力障碍的音乐家中,这个成分可能反映了错误检测和/或错误补偿的过程,即试图抵消音乐家即将感知到的不期望的感觉后果(错误的音高)。因此,听觉反馈似乎不是错误检测的先决条件,这与之前的行为结果一致。相比之下,当听觉反馈被外部操纵且出乎意料时,运动表现可能会严重扭曲,尽管并非所有反馈改变都会导致表现受损。最近研究反馈处理的神经关联的研究表明,出乎意料的反馈在音符出现后会引发 ERP 成分,在音乐演奏期间比在仅仅感知相同的音乐序列时表现出更大的振幅。因此,这些结果强调了运动动作对于听觉信息处理的作用。此外,还将讨论最近的方法学进展,例如将 3D 运动捕捉技术与 EEG 相结合。这种不同测量方法的组合可能有助于解开不同反馈类型(本体感觉和听觉反馈)的作用,并总体上更好地理解运动和听觉领域在错误监控过程中的复杂相互作用。最后,将讨论这方面的悬而未决的问题和未来方向。