Suppr超能文献

一项国际试验中急性心力衰竭住院患者护理质量的全球差异:奈西立肽治疗失代偿性心力衰竭试验(ASCEND-HF)急性研究临床疗效的结果。

Global variation in quality of care among patients hospitalized with acute heart failure in an international trial: findings from the acute study clinical effectiveness of nesiritide in decompensated heart failure trial (ASCEND-HF).

作者信息

Howlett Jonathan G, Ezekowitz Justin A, Podder Mohua, Hernandez Adrian F, Diaz Rafael, Dickstein Kenneth, Dunlap Mark E, Corbalán Ramón, Armstrong Paul W, Starling Randall C, O'Connor Christopher M, Califf Robert M, Fonarow Gregg C

机构信息

Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013 Sep 1;6(5):534-42. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000119. Epub 2013 Jul 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Translation of evidence-based heart failure (HF) therapies to clinical practice is incomplete and may vary internationally. We examined common measures of quality of care in patients enrolled in the international Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure trial.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients were admitted to 398 hospitals for acute HF in 5 regions (North America, n=3149; Latin America, n=658; Asia Pacific, n=1744; Central Europe, n=966; and Western Europe, n=490). Predefined quality indicators assessed at hospital discharge included the following: medications (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers, β-blockers, aldosterone antagonists, hydralazine/nitrates, statin therapy, and warfarin), use (or planned use) of implantable intracardiac devices, and blood pressure control (<140/90 mm Hg). We determined regional variations in quality indicators as well as the temporal variation of these indicators during the course of the trial. There was significant variation in conformity among different quality indicators, ranging from 0% to 89%. Of all potential performance opportunities, 19 076 of 32 268 (59%) were met, with Central Europe highest at 64%, followed by North America (63%), Western Europe (61%), Latin America (56%), and Asia Pacific (51%; P<0.0001). North America, Central Europe, and Asia Pacific regions demonstrated a modest increase in quality indicator conformity over time, although there was no significant change in other regions.

CONCLUSIONS

Quality of care for patients hospitalized with acute HF varies and remains suboptimal even within a randomized clinical trial, which included quality improvement interventions. Specific measures designed to improve performance measures should be implemented even within multicenter clinical trials.

摘要

背景

基于证据的心力衰竭(HF)治疗方法在临床实践中的应用并不完整,且可能因国家而异。我们在参与国际奈西立肽治疗失代偿性心力衰竭临床疗效急性研究试验的患者中,研究了常见的医疗质量衡量指标。

方法与结果

患者被收治于5个地区的398家医院治疗急性心力衰竭(北美,n = 3149;拉丁美洲,n = 658;亚太地区,n = 1744;中欧,n = 966;西欧,n = 490)。出院时评估的预定义质量指标包括:药物治疗(血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂、血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂、β受体阻滞剂、醛固酮拮抗剂、肼屈嗪/硝酸盐、他汀类药物治疗和华法林)、植入式心内装置的使用(或计划使用)以及血压控制(<140/90 mmHg)。我们确定了质量指标的地区差异以及这些指标在试验过程中的时间变化。不同质量指标的符合率差异很大,从0%到89%不等。在所有潜在的执行机会中,32268项中有19076项(59%)得到满足,中欧最高,为64%,其次是北美(63%)、西欧(61%)、拉丁美洲(56%)和亚太地区(51%;P<0.0001)。北美、中欧和亚太地区的质量指标符合率随时间有适度提高,尽管其他地区没有显著变化。

结论

即使在包括质量改进干预措施的随机临床试验中,急性心力衰竭住院患者的医疗质量仍存在差异且仍未达到最佳水平。即使在多中心临床试验中,也应实施旨在改善性能指标的具体措施。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验