iMTA/iBMG, Institute of Health Policy and Management/Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University of Rotterdam, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Eur J Health Econ. 2013 Jul;14 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S43-51. doi: 10.1007/s10198-013-0507-y.
This article examines the effect that different specifications of the time trade-off (TTO) valuation task may have on values for EQ-5D-5L health states. The new variants of the TTO, namely lead-time TTO and lag-time TTO, along with the classic approach to TTO were compared using two durations for the health states (15 and 20 years). The study tested whether these methods yield comparable health-state values. TTO tasks were administered online. It was found that lag-time TTO produced lower values than lead-time TTO and that the difference was larger in the longer time frame. Classic TTO values most resembled those of the lag-time TTO in a 20-year time frame in terms of mean absolute difference. The relative importance of different domains of health was systematically affected by the duration of the health state. In the tasks with a 10-year health-state duration, anxiety/depression had the largest negative impact on health-state values; in the tasks with a 5-year duration, the pain/discomfort domain had the largest negative impact.
本文考察了时间权衡(TTO)估值任务的不同规格可能对 EQ-5D-5L 健康状态值产生的影响。使用两种健康状态持续时间(15 年和 20 年)比较了新的 TTO 变体(即提前 TTO 和滞后 TTO)和经典 TTO 方法。该研究测试了这些方法是否产生可比的健康状态值。TTO 任务通过在线进行管理。结果发现,滞后 TTO 产生的价值低于提前 TTO,并且在较长的时间框架内差异更大。在 20 年的时间框架内,经典 TTO 值与滞后 TTO 值在平均绝对差异方面最相似。健康状态持续时间系统地影响了健康的不同领域的相对重要性。在健康状态持续时间为 10 年的任务中,焦虑/抑郁对健康状态值的负面影响最大;在持续时间为 5 年的任务中,疼痛/不适域的负面影响最大。