Suppr超能文献

数字乳腺断层合成摄影与单纯数字乳腺摄影用于乳腺癌筛查的比较。

Comparison of tomosynthesis plus digital mammography and digital mammography alone for breast cancer screening.

机构信息

From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, PO Box 208042, New Haven, CT 06520-8042.

出版信息

Radiology. 2013 Dec;269(3):694-700. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13130307. Epub 2013 Oct 28.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare screening recall rates and cancer detection rates of tomosynthesis plus conventional digital mammography to those of conventional digital mammography alone.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients presenting for screening mammography between October 1, 2011, and September 30, 2012, at four clinical sites were reviewed in this HIPAA-compliant retrospective study, for which the institutional review board granted approval and waived the requirement for informed consent. Patients at sites with digital tomosynthesis were offered screening with digital mammography plus tomosynthesis. Patients at sites without tomosynthesis underwent conventional digital mammography. Recall rates were calculated and stratified according to breast density and patient age. Cancer detection rates were calculated and stratified according to the presence of a risk factor for breast cancer. The Fisher exact test was used to compare the two groups. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the effect of screening method, breast density, patient age, and cancer risk on the odds of recall from screening.

RESULTS

A total of 13 158 patients presented for screening mammography; 6100 received tomosynthesis. The overall recall rate was 8.4% for patients in the tomosynthesis group and 12.0% for those in the conventional mammography group (P < .01). The addition of tomosynthesis reduced recall rates for all breast density and patient age groups, with significant differences (P < .05) found for scattered fibroglandular, heterogeneously dense, and extremely dense breasts and for patients younger than 40 years, those aged 40-49 years, those aged 50-59 years, and those aged 60-69 years. These findings persisted when multivariate logistic regression was used to control for differences in age, breast density, and elevated risk of breast cancer. The cancer detection rate was 5.7 per 1000 in patients receiving tomosynthesis versus 5.2 per 1000 in patients receiving conventional mammography alone (P = .70).

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing tomosynthesis plus digital mammography had significantly lower screening recall rates. The greatest reductions were for those younger than 50 years and those with dense breasts. A nonsignificant 9.5% increase in cancer detection was observed in the tomosynthesis group.

摘要

目的

比较断层合成数字乳腺摄影与单纯常规数字乳腺摄影的筛查召回率和癌症检出率。

材料与方法

本 HIPAA 合规性回顾性研究回顾了 2011 年 10 月 1 日至 2012 年 9 月 30 日期间在四个临床地点进行筛查性乳房 X 线摄影的所有患者,机构审查委员会为此批准并豁免了知情同意书的要求。有数字断层合成设备的地点的患者可选择接受数字乳腺摄影加断层合成进行筛查。没有断层合成设备的地点的患者接受常规数字乳腺摄影。根据乳房密度和患者年龄计算并分层召回率。根据乳腺癌风险因素的存在计算并分层癌症检出率。使用 Fisher 确切检验比较两组。使用多变量逻辑回归评估筛查方法、乳房密度、患者年龄和癌症风险对筛查召回率的影响。

结果

共有 13158 名患者接受了筛查性乳房 X 线摄影;其中 6100 名患者接受了断层合成。在接受断层合成的患者中,总体召回率为 8.4%,在接受常规乳腺摄影的患者中为 12.0%(P<.01)。对于所有乳房密度和患者年龄组,添加断层合成都降低了召回率,差异具有统计学意义(P<.05),包括散在纤维腺体、不均匀致密和极度致密的乳房,以及年龄小于 40 岁、40-49 岁、50-59 岁和 60-69 岁的患者。当使用多变量逻辑回归控制年龄、乳房密度和乳腺癌风险升高的差异时,这些发现仍然存在。接受断层合成的患者中每 1000 例癌症检出率为 5.7 例,接受单纯常规乳腺摄影的患者中为 5.2 例(P=.70)。

结论

接受断层合成数字乳腺摄影加数字乳腺摄影的患者的筛查召回率显著降低。降幅最大的是年龄小于 50 岁和乳房致密的患者。在断层合成组观察到癌症检出率有非显著的 9.5%的增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验