Suppr超能文献

[前哨淋巴结转移状态在预测乳腺癌患者非前哨淋巴结残留病灶存在中的价值]

[Value of sentinel lymph node metastasis status in predicting the presence of residual disease in the non-sentinel lymph node of breast cancer patients].

作者信息

Yang Ben, Yang Li, Zuo Wen-shu, Ge Wen-kai, Wang Yong-sheng, Zheng Gang, Zheng Mei-zhu, Yu Zhi-yong

机构信息

School of Medicine and Life Sciences, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2013 Apr 9;93(14):1072-5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the value of sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) metastasis status in predicting the presence of residual disease in non-sentinel lymph nodes (nSLN) and the feasibility of avoiding or reducing the scope of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for patients with single positive SLN.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted for 2265 patients with invasive breast carcinomas undergoing sentinel lymph nodes biopsy (SLNB) at Shandong Cancer Hospital between November 1999 and December 2011. And 1228 patients with axillary dissection were screened and divided into 5 groups of (-), (1/n), (1/1), (n/N), (n/n) (n ≥ 2, N ≥ 3, N > n) according to the status of SLN metastasis.

RESULTS

The nSLN metastasis rate of SLN(-), (1/n), (1/1), (n/N) and (n/n) groups was 11.8%(73/618), 25.2%(65/258), 49.6%(67/135), 48.4%(60/124)and 65.6%(61/93)respectively. A comparison of SLN(-), (1/n), (1/1), (n/N), and (n/n) groups of nSLN metastasis showed a significant difference (P = 0.000). The differences of nSLN metastasis between SLN(-) and other groups (including 1/n, 1/1, n/N, n/n group) were significant (P = 0.000). This difference was also significant between SLN (1/n) and other positive groups (include 1/1, n/N, n/n group) (P = 0.000), but not significant between SLN(1/1), (n/N) and (n/n) groups (P = 0.842, 0.017, 0.042 respectively, Chi-square segmentation). No significant difference existed between axillary lymph node metastasis on Level II and III of SLN 1/n group and SLN(-) group (P = 0.012, 0.570,χ(2) segmentation).

CONCLUSIONS

The status of SLN metastasis is one of influencing factors for the nSLN metastasis of patients with invasive breast cancer. The possibility of non-sentinel lymph node involvement for patients with single SLN metastasis was smaller than that of other SLN-positive patients. It is safe for some SLN 1/n patients to undergo low lymph node dissection. But ALND is not avoided for patients with single positive SLN (SLN 1/n n ≥ 2). Their clinicopathological variables should be also considered.

摘要

目的

探讨前哨淋巴结(SLN)转移状态在预测非前哨淋巴结(nSLN)残留疾病存在中的价值,以及对于单枚SLN阳性患者避免或缩小腋窝淋巴结清扫(ALND)范围的可行性。

方法

对1999年11月至2011年12月在山东省肿瘤医院接受前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)的2265例浸润性乳腺癌患者进行回顾性研究。筛选出1228例行腋窝清扫的患者,并根据SLN转移状态分为(-)、(1/n)、(1/1)、(n/N)、(n/n)(n≥2,N≥3,N>n)5组。

结果

SLN(-)、(1/n)、(1/1)、(n/N)和(n/n)组的nSLN转移率分别为11.8%(73/618)、25.2%(65/258)、49.6%(67/135)、48.4%(60/124)和65.6%(61/93)。SLN(-)、(1/n)、(1/1)、(n/N)和(n/n)组的nSLN转移情况比较差异有统计学意义(P = 0.000)。SLN(-)组与其他组(包括1/n、1/1、n/N、n/n组)的nSLN转移差异有统计学意义(P = 0.000)。SLN(1/n)组与其他阳性组(包括1/1、n/N、n/n组)之间差异也有统计学意义(P = 0.000),但SLN(1/1)、(n/N)和(n/n)组之间差异无统计学意义(分别为P = 0.842、0.017、0.042,卡方分割)。SLN 1/n组与SLN(-)组在腋窝淋巴结Ⅱ级和Ⅲ级转移方面差异无统计学意义(P = 0.012、0.570,χ²分割)。

结论

SLN转移状态是浸润性乳腺癌患者nSLN转移的影响因素之一。单枚SLN转移患者非前哨淋巴结受累的可能性小于其他SLN阳性患者。部分SLN 1/n患者行低位淋巴结清扫是安全的。但对于单枚阳性SLN(SLN 1/n n≥2)患者不能避免ALND,还应考虑其临床病理变量。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验