Suppr超能文献

DSM-5 物质使用障碍标准:建议和原理。

DSM-5 criteria for substance use disorders: recommendations and rationale.

机构信息

New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, USA.

出版信息

Am J Psychiatry. 2013 Aug;170(8):834-51. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.12060782.

Abstract

Since DSM-IV was published in 1994, its approach to substance use disorders has come under scrutiny. Strengths were identified (notably, reliability and validity of dependence), but concerns have also arisen. The DSM-5 Substance-Related Disorders Work Group considered these issues and recommended revisions for DSM-5. General concerns included whether to retain the division into two main disorders (dependence and abuse), whether substance use disorder criteria should be added or removed, and whether an appropriate substance use disorder severity indicator could be identified. Specific issues included possible addition of withdrawal syndromes for several substances, alignment of nicotine criteria with those for other substances, addition of biomarkers, and inclusion of nonsubstance, behavioral addictions.This article presents the major issues and evidence considered by the work group, which included literature reviews and extensive new data analyses. The work group recommendations for DSM-5 revisions included combining abuse and dependence criteria into a single substance use disorder based on consistent findings from over 200,000 study participants, dropping legal problems and adding craving as criteria, adding cannabis and caffeine withdrawal syndromes, aligning tobacco use disorder criteria with other substance use disorders, and moving gambling disorders to the chapter formerly reserved for substance-related disorders. The proposed changes overcome many problems, while further studies will be needed to address issues for which less data were available.

摘要

自 1994 年 DSM-IV 出版以来,其对物质使用障碍的方法受到了审查。确定了其优势(特别是依赖的可靠性和有效性),但也出现了一些担忧。DSM-5 物质相关障碍工作组考虑了这些问题,并为 DSM-5 提出了修订建议。一般关注的问题包括是否保留两种主要障碍(依赖和滥用)的划分,是否应添加或删除物质使用障碍标准,以及是否可以确定适当的物质使用障碍严重程度指标。具体问题包括为几种物质添加戒断综合征,使尼古丁标准与其他物质的标准一致,添加生物标志物,以及纳入非物质性、行为成瘾。本文介绍了工作组考虑的主要问题和证据,包括文献综述和广泛的新数据分析。工作组对 DSM-5 修订的建议包括将滥用和依赖标准合并为一种单一的物质使用障碍,这是基于对超过 200,000 名研究参与者的一致发现,放弃法律问题并将渴望添加为标准,添加大麻和咖啡因戒断综合征,使烟草使用障碍标准与其他物质使用障碍相一致,并将赌博障碍移至以前专门用于物质相关障碍的章节。拟议的变更克服了许多问题,而对于数据较少的问题,还需要进一步研究。

相似文献

1
DSM-5 criteria for substance use disorders: recommendations and rationale.
Am J Psychiatry. 2013 Aug;170(8):834-51. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.12060782.
3
Are specific dependence criteria necessary for different substances: how can research on cannabis inform this issue?
Addiction. 2006 Sep;101 Suppl 1:125-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01582.x.
6
Proposed changes in DSM-III substance use disorders: description and rationale.
Am J Psychiatry. 1986 Apr;143(4):463-8. doi: 10.1176/ajp.143.4.463.
7
Introduction to DSM-5 criteria linked papers in drug and alcohol dependence.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012 Apr 1;122(1-2):20-1. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.10.028. Epub 2011 Dec 2.
9
[DSM-5: important changes in the field of addictive diseases].
Nervenarzt. 2014 May;85(5):571-7. doi: 10.1007/s00115-013-3989-z.
10
Revising Substance-Related Disorders in the DSM-5: A History.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2022 Jan;83(1):99-105.

引用本文的文献

1
Rasch Analysis of Cannabis Use Disorder in an Adult Inpatient Sample.
Cannabis. 2025 Jul 15;8(2):141-152. doi: 10.26828/cannabis/2025/000229. eCollection 2025.
2
Opioid use disorder, pain, and cognitive impairment in older adults who have experienced homelessness.
Innov Aging. 2025 Jul 4;9(7):igaf075. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igaf075. eCollection 2025 Jul.
3
Exploring the therapeutic potential of psychedelics in treating substance use disorders.
Mol Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 19. doi: 10.1038/s41380-025-03168-w.
4
Addiction to Cosmetic Procedures: A Scoping Literature Review.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 Aug 12. doi: 10.1007/s00266-025-05153-8.
7
Comprehensive Review on Association of Bipolar Disorder and Substance Abuse: Dual Diagnosis and Treatment Approaches.
Cureus. 2025 Jun 19;17(6):e86363. doi: 10.7759/cureus.86363. eCollection 2025 Jun.
9
Quantitative Economon Model of Transactions for Drugs and Other Commodities.
bioRxiv. 2025 Jul 11:2025.07.08.663082. doi: 10.1101/2025.07.08.663082.
10
Characterization of neuronal ensembles in a model of dual reward conditioned place preference.
bioRxiv. 2025 Jun 15:2025.06.11.659163. doi: 10.1101/2025.06.11.659163.

本文引用的文献

1
The DSM-5 field trials and reliability of alcohol use disorder.
Am J Psychiatry. 2013 Apr;170(4):442-3. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.13010032.
2
An overview of and rationale for changes proposed for pathological gambling in DSM-5.
J Gambl Stud. 2014 Jun;30(2):493-502. doi: 10.1007/s10899-013-9370-0.
3
Validity of proposed DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for nicotine use disorder: results from 734 Israeli lifetime smokers.
Psychol Med. 2013 Oct;43(10):2179-90. doi: 10.1017/S0033291712002954. Epub 2013 Jan 14.
4
An empirical evaluation of proposed changes for gambling diagnosis in the DSM-5.
Addiction. 2013 Mar;108(3):575-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.04087.x. Epub 2012 Nov 1.
5
Prevalence of DSM-IV and DSM-5 alcohol, cocaine, opioid, and cannabis use disorders in a largely substance dependent sample.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013 Jan 1;127(1-3):215-9. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.07.009. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
6
Rationale for changes in DSM-5.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2012 Jul;73(4):705. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2012.73.705.
7
Combining abuse and dependence in DSM-5.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2012 Jul;73(4):702-4. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2012.73.702.
8
The role of craving in AUDs: dimensionality and Differential Functioning in the DSM-5.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012 Sep 1;125(1-2):75-80. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.03.019. Epub 2012 Apr 17.
9
A comparison of DSM-IV and DSM-5 panel members' financial associations with industry: a pernicious problem persists.
PLoS Med. 2012;9(3):e1001190. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001190. Epub 2012 Mar 13.
10
Characterization of individuals seeking treatment for caffeine dependence.
Psychol Addict Behav. 2012 Dec;26(4):948-54. doi: 10.1037/a0027246. Epub 2012 Feb 27.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验