Crowley Thomas J
Division of Substance Dependence, Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO, USA.
Addiction. 2006 Sep;101 Suppl 1:115-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01594.x.
Since the publication of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders fourth edition (DSM-IV), many studies have addressed substance use disorders (SUD) in adolescents. Based on that adolescent literature, this paper suggests further research to help guide decisions about revising for DSM-V the SUD criteria in DSM-IV.
The author has reviewed the 'Substance Related Disorders' section of DSM-IV-TR, recalled his experience in helping to draft that section, accessed relevant articles in PubMed and reviewed his own extensive file of literature citations.
This paper suggests six questions for adolescent research to help guide the framers of DSM-V's 'Substance Related Disorders' section: (a) DSM-IV did not provide a diagnosis of cannabis withdrawal; should DSM-V continue that position? (b) Should SUD be included or referenced among 'Disorders Usually First Diagnosed in Infancy, Childhood, or Adolescence'? (c) Can inter-rater reliability of the substance abuse (SA) criteria be improved with altered example situations, text descriptions or phrasing of the current criteria? (d) Between ages 14 and 18 years is earlier onset of SUD a severity marker that could be incorporated into DSM-V as a predictor of worse course? (e) In DSM-V could a phenotypic descriptor of pathological multi-substance involvement document severity and predict course of SUD? (f) Could clinicians and patients benefit from DSM-V-related postpublication procedures for classifying emerging new drugs into DSM-V's categories?
Without substantive changes in SA or substance dependence diagnostic criteria, research may improve the usefulness of those criteria for adolescents.
自《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)出版以来,许多研究都涉及青少年物质使用障碍(SUD)。基于该青少年文献,本文建议开展进一步研究,以帮助指导有关修订DSM-IV中SUD标准以供DSM-V使用的决策。
作者回顾了DSM-IV-TR中的“物质相关障碍”部分,回忆了自己在协助起草该部分时的经历,查阅了PubMed上的相关文章,并查阅了自己大量的文献引用文件。
本文提出了六个针对青少年研究的问题,以帮助指导DSM-V“物质相关障碍”部分的制定者:(a)DSM-IV未对大麻戒断作出诊断;DSM-V应继续维持这一立场吗?(b)SUD应纳入“通常在婴儿期、儿童期或青少年期首次诊断的障碍”中,还是应在其中被提及?(c)通过改变当前标准的示例情况、文本描述或措辞,能否提高物质滥用(SA)标准的评分者间信度?(d)在14至18岁之间,SUD更早发病是否是一个严重程度指标,可作为DSM-V中预后较差的预测因素纳入?(e)在DSM-V中,病理性多物质使用的表型描述符能否记录SUD的严重程度并预测其病程?(f)临床医生和患者能否从与DSM-V相关的出版后程序中受益,该程序用于将新出现的药物分类到DSM-V的类别中?
如果SA或物质依赖诊断标准没有实质性变化,研究可能会提高这些标准对青少年的实用性。