Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, SUNY, 431 Kapoor Hall, Buffalo, New York, 14214, USA.
AAPS J. 2013 Oct;15(4):1051-63. doi: 10.1208/s12248-013-9512-4. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
In this study, glucose and insulin concentration-time profiles in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) under meal tolerance test (MTT) and hyperglycemic clamp (HGC) conditions were co-modeled simultaneously. Blood glucose and insulin concentrations were obtained from 20 subjects enrolled in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, two-way crossover study. Patients were treated with palosuran or placebo twice daily for 4 weeks and then switched to the alternative treatment after a 4-week washout period. The MTT and HGC tests were performed 1 h after drug administration on days 28 and 29 of each treatment period. Population data analysis was performed using NONMEM. The HGC model incorporates insulin-dependent glucose clearance and glucose-induced insulin secretion. This model was extended for the MTT, in which glucose absorption was described using a transit compartment with a mean transit time of 62.5 min. The incretin effect (insulin secretion triggered by oral glucose intake) was also included, but palosuran did not influence insulin secretion or sensitivity. Glucose clearance was 0.164 L/min with intersubject and interoccasion variability of 9.57% and 31.8%. Insulin-dependent glucose clearance for the HGC was about 3-fold greater than for the MTT (0.0111 vs. 0.00425 L/min/[mU/L]). The maximal incretin effect was estimated to enhance insulin secretion 2-fold. The lack of palosuran effect coupled with a population-based analysis provided quantitative insights into the variability of glucose and insulin regulation in patients with T2DM following multiple glucose tolerance tests. Application of these models may also prove useful in antihyperglycemic drug development and assessing glucose-insulin homeostasis.
在这项研究中,20 名 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)患者同时接受了口服糖耐量试验(MTT)和高血糖钳夹(HGC)两种负荷试验,对其血糖和胰岛素浓度-时间曲线进行了协同建模。患者接受帕洛鲁兰或安慰剂每日两次治疗 4 周,然后在 4 周洗脱期后切换为替代治疗。在每个治疗期的第 28 天和第 29 天,在药物给药后 1 小时进行 MTT 和 HGC 测试。使用 NONMEM 进行群体数据分析。HGC 模型纳入了胰岛素依赖的葡萄糖清除和葡萄糖诱导的胰岛素分泌。该模型扩展到 MTT 中,其中使用具有平均转运时间为 62.5 分钟的转运室来描述葡萄糖吸收。肠促胰岛素效应(口服葡萄糖摄入触发的胰岛素分泌)也包括在内,但帕洛鲁兰不影响胰岛素分泌或敏感性。葡萄糖清除率为 0.164 L/min,个体间和个体间变异性分别为 9.57%和 31.8%。HGC 的胰岛素依赖葡萄糖清除率大约是 MTT 的 3 倍(0.0111 比 0.00425 L/min/[mU/L])。最大肠促胰岛素效应估计可将胰岛素分泌增强 2 倍。缺乏帕洛鲁兰的作用,加上基于人群的分析,为 T2DM 患者在多次葡萄糖耐量试验后葡萄糖和胰岛素调节的变异性提供了定量见解。这些模型的应用也可能在抗高血糖药物开发和评估葡萄糖-胰岛素稳态方面证明是有用的。