CORR Insights ®: Have levels of evidence improved the quality of orthopaedic research?
作者信息
Berger Vance W
机构信息
Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA,
出版信息
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Nov;471(11):3687-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3203-4. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
CORR Insights ®: Have levels of evidence improved the quality of orthopaedic research?CORR 见解®：证据水平是否提高了骨科研究的质量？
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Nov;471(11):3687-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3203-4. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
2
Which evidence will you act on?你将依据哪些证据采取行动？
Bone Joint J. 2019 May;101-B(5):497-499. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B5.BJJ-2019-0373.
3
Editorial: How Does CORR Evaluate Survey Studies?社论：《矫形与创伤研究杂志》如何评估调查研究？
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Sep;475(9):2143-2145. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5430-6. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
4
Have levels of evidence improved the quality of orthopaedic research?证据水平是否提高了矫形外科研究的质量？
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Nov;471(11):3679-86. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3159-4. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
5
Introducing levels of evidence to the journal.向该期刊引入证据级别。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Jan;85(1):1-3.
6
Levels of evidence at the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America annual meetings.北美小儿骨科学会年会的证据级别
J Pediatr Orthop. 2010 Sep;30(6):612-6. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181e0cb70.
7
Time to Purposefully Plan Ahead: A Call for Quality in Research.是时候有目的地提前规划了：呼吁提高研究质量。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016 May;27(5):615-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2016.02.020. Epub 2016 Mar 24.
8
Shift needed in evidence-based medicine.循证医学需要转变。
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2012 Sep;41(9):396, 417.
9
CONSORTing with a QUOROM of MOOSES: the standards movement in scientific reporting.遵循MOOSES的QUOROM：科学报告中的标准运动。 （注：这里的CONSORT、QUOROM、MOOSES可能是特定领域的专业术语或缩写，具体含义需结合相关专业背景理解）
Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(1):28-9. doi: 10.1002/nau.20854.
10
How should medical science change?医学应该如何改变？
Lancet. 2014 Jan 18;383(9913):197-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62678-1. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
引用本文的文献
1
Has the Level of Evidence of Podium Presentations at the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Annual Meeting Changed Over Time?肌肉骨骼肿瘤学会年会 podium 展示的证据水平随时间有变化吗？
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Mar;475(3):853-860. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4763-x.
本文引用的文献
1
Intent-to-treat: further insight.
Res Nurs Health. 2011 Feb;34(1):4; author reply 5-6. doi: 10.1002/nur.20405. Epub 2010 Oct 18.
2
Making statistics boring again.让统计学再次变得无趣。
Stat Med. 2010 Jun 15;29(13):1458. doi: 10.1002/sim.3884.
3
Is the Jadad score the proper evaluation of trials?Jadad评分是对试验的恰当评估吗？
J Rheumatol. 2006 Aug;33(8):1710-1; author reply 1711-2.
4
Does the Prentice criterion validate surrogate endpoints?普伦蒂斯标准是否验证了替代终点？
Stat Med. 2004 May 30;23(10):1571-8. doi: 10.1002/sim.1780.
5
Direct effect on validity of response run-in selection in clinical trials.对临床试验中反应导入期选择有效性的直接影响。
Control Clin Trials. 2003 Apr;24(2):156-66. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(02)00316-1.
6
Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?评估随机临床试验报告的质量：设盲是否必要？
Control Clin Trials. 1996 Feb;17(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4.
7
The scandal of poor medical research.糟糕的医学研究丑闻。
BMJ. 1994 Jan 29;308(6924):283-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6924.283.
Zotero 插件