Institute of Affective and Social Neuroscience, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China.
Sci China Life Sci. 2013 Sep;56(9):835-47. doi: 10.1007/s11427-013-4527-8. Epub 2013 Jul 31.
Using a rapid serial visual presentation paradigm, we previously showed that the average amplitudes of six event-related potential (ERP) components were affected by different categories of emotional faces. In the current study, we investigated the six discriminating components on a single-trial level to clarify whether the amplitude difference between experimental conditions results from a difference in the real variability of single-trial amplitudes or from latency jitter across trials. It is found that there were consistent amplitude differences in the single-trial P1, N170, VPP, N3, and P3 components, demonstrating that a substantial proportion of the average amplitude differences can be explained by the pure variability in amplitudes on a single-trial basis between experimental conditions. These single-trial results verified the three-stage scheme of facial expression processing beyond multitrial ERP averaging, and showed the three processing stages of "fear popup", "emotional/unemotional discrimination", and "complete separation" based on the single-trial ERP dynamics.
先前,我们采用快速序列视觉呈现范式,证明了六种事件相关电位(ERP)成分的平均振幅受不同类别的情绪面孔的影响。在当前研究中,我们在单次试验水平上研究了这六种有区别的成分,以阐明实验条件下的振幅差异是源于单试振幅的真实变异性差异,还是源于试验间潜伏期抖动。研究发现,在 P1、N170、VPP、N3 和 P3 这几个单试成分中均存在一致的振幅差异,表明平均振幅差异的很大一部分可以用实验条件下的单试振幅纯变异性来解释。这些单次试验结果验证了面部表情处理的三阶段模型,超越了多试 ERP 平均,并且基于单次试验 ERP 动力学显示了“恐惧弹出”、“情绪/非情绪辨别”和“完全分离”这三个处理阶段。