Georgescu I, Gavriliu S, Pârvan A, Martiniuc A, Japie E, Ghiță R, Drăghici I, Hamei Ş, Ţiripa I, El Nayef T, Dan D
Maria Sklodowska Curie Emergency Hospital for Children, Bucharest, Romania.
J Med Life. 2013 Jun 15;6(2):131-9. Epub 2013 Jun 25.
The Study and Research Group in Pediatric Orthopedics-2012 initated this retrospective study due to the fact that in Romania and in other countries, the numerous procedures do not ensure the physicians a definite point of view related to the therapeutic criteria in the treatment of supracondylar fractures. That is why the number of complications and their severity brought into notice these existent deficiencies. In order to correct some of these complications, cubitus varus or valgus, Prof. Al. Pesamosca communicated a paper called "Personal procedure in the treatment of posttraumatic cubitus varus" at the County Conference from Bacău, in June 24, 1978. This procedure has next been made popular by Prof. Gh. Burnei and his coworkers by operating patients with cubitus varus or valgus due to supracondylar humeral fractures and by presenting papers related to the subject at the national and international congresses. The latest paper regarding this problem has been presented at the 29th Annual Meeting of the European Pediatric Orthopedic Society in Zagreb, Croatia, April 7-10, 2010, being titled "Distal humeral Z-osteotomy for posttraumatic cubitus varus or valgus", having as authors Gh. Burnei, Ileana Georgescu, Ştefan Gavriliu, Costel Vlad and Daniela Dan. As members of this group, based on the performed studies, we wish to make popular this type of osteosynthesis, which ensures a tight fixation, avoids complications and allows a rapid postoperative activity.
The acknowledged treatment for these types of fractures is the orthopedic one and it must be accomplished as soon as possible, in the first 6 hours, by reduction and cast immobilization or by closed or open reduction and fixation, using one of the several methods (Judet, Boehler, Kapandji, San Antonio, San Diego, Burnei's double X technique). The exposed treatment is indicated in irreducible supracondylar humeral fractures, in reducible, but unstable type, in polytraumatized patients with supracondylar fractures, in supracondylar fractures with vascular injury, in late presenting fractures, in case of loss of reduction under cast immobilization or in case of surgery with other types of fixation that is deteriorated. We have been using Burnei's osteosynthesis for about 10 years.
This paper aims to present the operative technique, its results and advantages.
56 cases were treated with Burnei's "double X" osteosynthesis in "Alexandru Pesamosca" Surgery Clinics, from 2001 to 2011. We used the Kocher approach and the aim of surgery was to obtain a fixation that does not require cast immobilization and that allows motion 24 hours after the surgery. The wires placed in "double X" must not occupy the olecranon fossa. The reduction must be anatomical and the olecranon fossa free. Flexion and extension of the elbow must be in normal range after surgery without crackles or limitations. This surgery was performed on patients with: Loss of reduction after 10 days with cast immobilization; Surgery with other types of fixation, deteriorated; Polytraumatized patients with supracondylar fracture; After neglected or late presenting fractures, without the orthopedic reduction made in emergency; Fractures with edema and blistering.
The patients' ages ranged 3 to12 years old, the mean age for girls was 7,3 years and 6,8 for boys. The hospitalization ranged 3 to 7 days, the average period being of 5 days. The wires had been pulled out after 21 days. The total recovery of the flexion and extension motion of the elbow was, depending on the age, between 21 and 40 days with an average period of 30 days. There were 5 cases of minor complications: in 3 cases the wires migrated outwards up to the 10th day and in 2 cases the wires were found in the olecranon fossa. The CT exam highlighted the impingement effect and the wire that passed through the olecranon fossa had to be removed between the 7th and the 9th day. No reported cases of cubitus varus or valgus were reported.
The Burnei's "double X" osteosynthesis does not require cast immobilization. In oblique fractures, the stability is more difficult to obtain and by using other methods, elbow stiffness or ulnar nerve palsy may appear. The Burnei's "double X" osteosynthesis ensures stability of these types of fractures and avoids complications. This technique allows early motion after surgery and, in case of polytrauma, ensures comfort both to the patient and the physician, allowing repetitive examinations, preferential positions or the nursing of the extensive skin lesions.
小儿骨科研究与研究小组-2012开展了这项回顾性研究,原因是在罗马尼亚和其他国家,众多的治疗方法并未为医生提供有关肱骨髁上骨折治疗标准的明确观点。这就是为什么并发症的数量及其严重程度凸显了这些现存的不足。为了纠正其中一些并发症,如肘内翻或肘外翻,阿尔·佩萨莫斯卡教授于1978年6月24日在巴克乌县会议上发表了一篇名为《创伤后肘内翻治疗的个人方法》的论文。此后,格·布尔内教授及其同事通过对因肱骨髁上骨折导致肘内翻或肘外翻的患者进行手术,并在国内和国际大会上发表相关论文,使该方法得到了推广。关于这个问题的最新论文于2010年4月7日至10日在克罗地亚萨格勒布举行的第29届欧洲小儿骨科学会年会上发表,题目为《肱骨远端Z形截骨术治疗创伤后肘内翻或肘外翻》,作者为格·布尔内、伊利安娜·乔治斯库、斯特凡·加夫里留、科斯特尔·弗拉德和丹妮拉·丹。作为该研究小组的成员,基于已开展的研究,我们希望推广这种能确保牢固固定、避免并发症并允许术后快速活动的骨固定术。
公认的此类骨折治疗方法是骨科治疗,必须在最初6小时内尽快完成,通过复位和石膏固定,或通过闭合或开放复位及固定,可采用多种方法之一(朱代、伯勒尔、卡潘迪、圣安东尼奥、圣地亚哥、布尔内的双X技术)。切开治疗适用于不可复位的肱骨髁上骨折、可复位但不稳定型骨折、合并髁上骨折的多发伤患者、伴有血管损伤的髁上骨折、延迟就诊的骨折、石膏固定下复位丢失的情况或其他类型固定手术失败的情况。我们使用布尔内的骨固定术已有约10年。
本文旨在介绍手术技术、其结果及优点。
2001年至2011年,在“亚历山德鲁·佩萨莫斯卡”外科诊所对56例患者采用布尔内的“双X”骨固定术进行治疗。我们采用科赫尔入路,手术目的是获得一种无需石膏固定且术后24小时即可活动的固定方式。“双X”放置的钢丝不得占据鹰嘴窝。复位必须达到解剖复位且鹰嘴窝无阻挡。术后肘关节的屈伸必须在正常范围内,无摩擦音或受限。该手术适用于以下患者:石膏固定10天后复位丢失;采用其他类型固定手术失败;合并髁上骨折的多发伤患者;被忽视或延迟就诊的骨折,未进行急诊骨科复位;伴有水肿和水疱的骨折。
患者年龄在3至12岁之间,女孩平均年龄为7.3岁,男孩为6.8岁。住院时间为3至7天,平均为5天。钢丝在21天后取出。肘关节屈伸运动的完全恢复,根据年龄不同,在21至40天之间,平均为30天。有5例轻微并发症:3例钢丝在第10天向外移位,2例钢丝出现在鹰嘴窝内。CT检查显示有撞击效应,穿过鹰嘴窝的钢丝必须在第7至9天取出。未报告肘内翻或肘外翻病例。
布尔内的“双X”骨固定术无需石膏固定。在斜形骨折中,获得稳定性更困难,采用其他方法可能会出现肘关节僵硬或尺神经麻痹。布尔内的“双X”骨固定术确保了此类骨折的稳定性并避免并发症。该技术允许术后早期活动,在多发伤情况下,能确保患者和医生的舒适,便于进行重复检查、采取优先体位或护理广泛的皮肤损伤。