• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

棘突间植入物后异位骨化的发生率。

Incidence of heterotopic ossification after implantation of interspinous process devices.

机构信息

Zhejiang Spine Research Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College, Wenzhou, China.

出版信息

Neurosurg Focus. 2013 Aug;35(2):E3. doi: 10.3171/2013.3.FOCUS12406.

DOI:10.3171/2013.3.FOCUS12406
PMID:23905954
Abstract

OBJECT

This study aimed to investigate the incidence rate of heterotopic ossification (HO) after implantation of Coflex interspinous devices. Possible risk factors associated with HO were evaluated.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively analyzed patients who had undergone single-level (L4-5) implantation of a Coflex device for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Patient data recorded were age, sex, height, weight, body mass index, smoking habits, and surgical time. Heterotopic ossification was identified through lumbar anteroposterior and lateral view radiographs. The authors developed a simple classification for defining HO and compared HO-positive and HO-negative cases to identify possible risk factors.

RESULTS

Among 32 patients with follow-up times of 24-57 months, HO was detectable in 26 (81.2%). Among these 26 patients, HO was in the lateral space of the spinous process but not in the interspinous space in 8, HO was in the interspinous space but did not bridge the adjacent spinous process in 16, and interspinous fusion occurred at the level of the device in 2. Occurrence of HO was not associated with patient age, sex, height, weight, body mass index, smoking habits, or surgical time.

CONCLUSIONS

A high incidence of HO has been detected after implantation of Coflex devices. Clinicians should be aware of this possible outcome, and more studies should be conducted to clarify the clinical effects of HO.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查 Coflex 棘突间装置植入后异位骨化(HO)的发生率。评估与 HO 相关的可能危险因素。

方法

作者回顾性分析了接受单节段(L4-5)Coflex 装置植入治疗腰椎管狭窄症的患者。记录的患者数据包括年龄、性别、身高、体重、体重指数、吸烟习惯和手术时间。通过腰椎前后位和侧位 X 线片确定异位骨化。作者制定了一种简单的分类方法来定义 HO,并比较了 HO 阳性和 HO 阴性病例,以确定可能的危险因素。

结果

在随访时间为 24-57 个月的 32 例患者中,26 例(81.2%)可检测到 HO。在这 26 例患者中,8 例 HO 位于棘突侧方但不在棘突间,16 例 HO 位于棘突间但不跨越相邻棘突,2 例在装置水平发生棘突间融合。HO 的发生与患者年龄、性别、身高、体重、体重指数、吸烟习惯或手术时间无关。

结论

在 Coflex 装置植入后检测到 HO 的发生率较高。临床医生应意识到这种可能的结果,并应进行更多的研究以阐明 HO 的临床效果。

相似文献

1
Incidence of heterotopic ossification after implantation of interspinous process devices.棘突间植入物后异位骨化的发生率。
Neurosurg Focus. 2013 Aug;35(2):E3. doi: 10.3171/2013.3.FOCUS12406.
2
An analysis of heterotopic ossification in cervical disc arthroplasty: a novel morphologic classification of an ossified mass.颈椎间盘置换术后异位骨化的分析:骨化块的一种新的形态学分类。
Spine J. 2013 Apr;13(4):408-20. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.11.048. Epub 2013 Jan 16.
3
Early development and progression of heterotopic ossification in cervical total disc replacement.颈椎全椎间盘置换术后异位骨化的早期发展和进展。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 Jan;16(1):31-6. doi: 10.3171/2011.8.SPINE11303. Epub 2011 Oct 14.
4
Incidence and risk factors analysis of heterotopic ossification after cervical disc replacement.颈椎间盘置换术后异位骨化的发生率及危险因素分析
Chin Med J (Engl). 2014;127(22):3871-5.
5
Fusion after interspinous device placement.棘突间植入装置后的融合。
Orthopedics. 2012 Dec;35(12):e1822-5. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20121120-33.
6
The effects of carpentry on heterotopic ossification and mobility in cervical arthroplasty: determination by computed tomography with a minimum 2-year follow-up: Clinical article.木工对颈椎置换术后异位骨化和活动度的影响:至少 2 年随访的 CT 测定:临床文章。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 Jun;16(6):601-9. doi: 10.3171/2012.3.SPINE11436. Epub 2012 Mar 30.
7
[Analysis of effectiveness and incidence of heterotopic ossification after single-level Bryan cervical artificial disc replacement].[单节段Bryan颈椎人工椎间盘置换术后异位骨化的有效性及发生率分析]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Jun;26(6):699-702.
8
Paradoxical Radiographic Changes of Coflex Interspinous Device with Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.腰椎管狭窄症中使用Coflex棘突间装置至少随访2年的矛盾性影像学改变
World Neurosurg. 2016 Jan;85:177-84. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.08.069. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
9
Failure rates and complications of interspinous process decompression devices: a European multicenter study.棘突间减压装置的失败率和并发症:一项欧洲多中心研究。
Neurosurg Focus. 2015 Oct;39(4):E14. doi: 10.3171/2015.7.FOCUS15244.
10
Postoperative Heterotopic Ossification After Cervical Disc Replacement Is Likely a Reflection of the Degeneration Process.颈椎置换术后异位骨化可能是退变过程的反映。
World Neurosurg. 2019 May;125:e1063-e1068. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.244. Epub 2019 Feb 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Complications and radiographic changes after implantation of interspinous process devices: average eight-year follow-up.棘突间装置植入后的并发症和影像学改变:平均八年随访。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Aug 23;24(1):667. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06798-9.
2
ISASS Recommendations/Coverage Criteria for Decompression with Interlaminar Stabilization - Coverage Indications, Limitations, and/or Medical Necessity.ISASS关于椎板间稳定减压术的推荐/覆盖标准 - 覆盖指征、局限性和/或医疗必要性
Int J Spine Surg. 2016 Dec 5;10:41. doi: 10.14444/3041. eCollection 2016.
3
Interspinous process spacers versus traditional decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.
腰椎管狭窄症的棘突间撑开器与传统减压术:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Spine Surg. 2016 Mar;2(1):31-40. doi: 10.21037/jss.2016.01.07.
4
Interspinous posterior devices: What is the real surgical indication?棘突间后路装置:真正的手术适应症是什么?
World J Clin Cases. 2014 Sep 16;2(9):402-8. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v2.i9.402.
5
Interspinous spacer versus traditional decompressive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.棘突间撑开器与传统减压手术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的系统评价与Meta分析
PLoS One. 2014 May 8;9(5):e97142. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097142. eCollection 2014.