Suppr超能文献

通过单个单词、句子和自发言语评估可懂度:一项关于10岁儿童言语产生的方法学研究

Assessing intelligibility by single words, sentences and spontaneous speech: a methodological study of the speech production of 10-year-olds.

作者信息

Johannisson Tove B, Lohmander Anette, Persson Christina

机构信息

The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg , Göteborg , Sweden.

出版信息

Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2014 Dec;39(4):159-68. doi: 10.3109/14015439.2013.820487. Epub 2013 Aug 2.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of different assessment methods on intelligibility scores and to examine the validity and reliability of those methods. Four assessment methods were used: multiple-choice and transcription of single words (read out), transcription of sentences (read out), and spontaneous speech. The results showed a statistically significant difference between outcomes for the different assessment methods. Reliability was high for all methods. Validity was low for all three reading-based methods. The method using transcription of spontaneous speech had low validity for the population included. It was concluded that reading is not a suitable elicitation technique for 10-year-olds and that the assessment procedure used for spontaneous speech needs to be further developed and investigated.

摘要

本研究的目的是调查不同评估方法对可懂度得分的影响,并检验这些方法的有效性和可靠性。使用了四种评估方法:单项选择题和单个单词的转录(读出)、句子的转录(读出)以及自发言语。结果显示,不同评估方法的结果存在统计学上的显著差异。所有方法的可靠性都很高。基于阅读的所有三种方法的有效性都很低。对于所纳入的人群,使用自发言语转录的方法有效性较低。得出的结论是,阅读对于10岁儿童不是一种合适的诱发技术,并且用于自发言语的评估程序需要进一步开发和研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验