• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Assessing academic clinical fellows in general practice: square pegs in round holes?

作者信息

Cottrell Elizabeth, Protherough Kirsty, Howard John, Wilkinson Martin

机构信息

Primary Care Sciences, Keele University, UK.

出版信息

Educ Prim Care. 2013 Jul;24(4):266-73. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2013.11494185.

DOI:10.1080/14739879.2013.11494185
PMID:23906170
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Academic clinical fellows (ACFs) training in general practice (GP) record competency progression in their Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) e-portfolio. The General Medical Council (GMC) recommend that current workplace-based assessments (WPBAs) should be used flexibly and formatively. GP ACFs find the e-portfolio inflexible and often only use the learning log and personal development plan to demonstrate academic progress.

AIM

This pragmatic pilot was undertaken to evaluate the utility of three assessment tools to trainees in the academic setting.

METHODS

ACFs in two deaneries were asked to pilot the use of an academic learning needs analysis (LNA), a new academic supervisor report (ASR) and current WPBAs. The use and value of these tools was assessed using an electronic questionnaire and a focus group of ACFs.

RESULTS

Twenty-two GP ACFs responded to the questionnaire and six participated in the focus group. Use of WBPA was 32% (n = 7), LNA was 55% (n = 12) and ASR was 82% (n = 18). GP ACFs valued discussions of academic progress, particularly the formal identification of areas for development. Use of the tools appeared to facilitate constructive feedback about an ACF's academic role. ACFs disliked tools containing elements that were not applicable to their needs and/or setting, undertaking mandatory academic assessments prior to commencement of their academic post and uncertainty about which WPBA to use.

CONCLUSIONS

ACFs appreciate formally addressing progress, learning needs and how to maximise the use of their posts. Formative academic feedback would be best accepted if delivered using specifically designed academic tools that are integrated into the e-portfolio. When designing academic tools, both research and education activities need to be considered. Academic experience is a pre-requisite for formal assessment of academic progress; commencing academic activity in ST1 would enhance demonstration of progress in later years.

摘要

相似文献

1
Assessing academic clinical fellows in general practice: square pegs in round holes?
Educ Prim Care. 2013 Jul;24(4):266-73. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2013.11494185.
2
'It's the conversation they'll learn from': improving assessments for GP Specialist Trainees in hospital posts.“这是他们将从中学习的对话”:改进对医院岗位全科医生专科培训学员的评估。
Educ Prim Care. 2012 Jul;23(4):263-9. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2012.11494119.
3
Training in hospitals: what do GP specialist trainees think of workplace-based assessments?医院培训:全科医生专科培训学员对基于工作场所的评估有何看法?
Educ Prim Care. 2011 Mar;22(2):90-9. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2011.11493974.
4
A national evaluation of workplace-based assessment tools (WPBAs) in foundation dental training: a UK study. Effective and useful but do they provide an equitable training experience?全国范围内对基础牙科培训中基于工作场所的评估工具(WPBAs)的评估:一项英国研究。有效且有用,但它们是否提供了公平的培训体验?
Br Dent J. 2013 Mar;214(6):305-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2013.302.
5
How are workplace-based assessments viewed by UK psychiatry trainees?英国精神病学受训者如何看待基于工作场所的评估?
Psychiatr Danub. 2013 Sep;25 Suppl 2:S182-4.
6
Formative assessment of GP trainees' clinical skills.对全科医生培训学员临床技能的形成性评估。
Educ Prim Care. 2012 Mar;23(2):101-6. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2012.11494084.
7
Performance in practice; exploring trainer and trainee experiences of user-designed formative assessment tools.实践中的表现;探索培训师和学员对用户设计的形成性评估工具的体验。
Educ Prim Care. 2021 Jan;32(1):27-33. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2020.1815085. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
8
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
9
Implementation of workplace-based assessment in general practice.在全科医疗中实施基于工作场所的评估。
Educ Prim Care. 2019 May;30(3):133-144. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2019.1588788. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
10
'Putting it into words': developing the RCGP competency descriptors to include 'at-risk behaviours'.“用言语表达”:制定皇家全科医师学院能力描述以纳入“高危行为”
Educ Prim Care. 2012 Nov;23(6):404-21. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2012.11494152.