Department of Sports Traumatology, Center for Hip, Knee, and Foot Surgery, ATOS Hospital Heidelberg, Germany.
Arthroscopy. 2013 Aug;29(8):1297-307. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.05.017.
Our purpose was to study and describe the areas of the hip joint that can be safely visualized and operated on using a variety of portals for the central and peripheral compartments.
Twelve hip joints in 6 human cadavers were examined through 9 different central and peripheral arthroscopic portals. Markings of the accessible areas within the joint were made through an arthroscope. Dissection of the cadavers was carried out for final evaluation of the visible areas and those accessible for instruments. During dissection, anatomic proximity of the portals to relevant neurovascular structures was measured.
The central compartment was sufficiently accessible using the anterior, anterolateral, and posterolateral portals, with slight limitations in the posteromedial corner. A more medial portal did not offer substantial advantages regarding accessibility but decreased the safety distance to the femoral nerve. With regard to the peripheral compartment, the combination of the anterolateral and posterolateral portals allowed visualization of most of the joint. It was observed that the structure at highest risk of injury for the central anterior and the peripheral anterolateral portals was the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve.
In hip arthroscopy, the use of the standard anterior, anterolateral, and posterolateral portals allows proper accessibility of the central compartment, with slight limitations in the posteromedial corner. A more medial portal is not recommended with regard to its risk-benefit ratio. The peripheral compartment of the hip joint is sufficiently visible using the anterolateral and posterolateral portals. For treatment of specific pathologic conditions, a variation of these portals improves surgical accessibility. The anatomic structure at highest risk of injury during hip arthroscopy is the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve.
The general objectives of this study were to prepare surgeons to develop appropriate concepts of surgery and to facilitate preoperative planning.
本研究旨在探讨并描述髋关节不同中央和外周关节镜入路的可视及可操作区域。
通过 9 个不同的中央和外周关节镜入路检查了 6 具人体尸体的 12 个髋关节。通过关节镜对关节内可触及区域进行标记。对尸体进行解剖,以最终评估可视区域和可触及器械的区域。在解剖过程中,测量了关节镜入路与相关神经血管结构的解剖毗邻关系。
前、前外侧和后外侧关节镜入路可充分进入中央关节间隙,但后内侧角的进入存在一定限制。内侧入路虽然在进入方面没有明显优势,但会减小到股神经的安全距离。至于外周关节间隙,前外侧和后外侧关节镜入路的联合可使大部分关节可视化。研究发现,中央前侧和外周前外侧关节镜入路损伤风险最高的结构是股外侧皮神经。
在髋关节镜手术中,标准的前侧、前外侧和后外侧关节镜入路可充分进入中央关节间隙,但后内侧角的进入存在一定限制。内侧入路的风险效益比不建议采用。前外侧和后外侧关节镜入路可充分显露髋关节的外周关节间隙。对于特定的病理情况,这些入路的变化可提高手术的可及性。在髋关节镜手术中,损伤风险最高的解剖结构是股外侧皮神经。
本研究的总体目标是使外科医生能够制定适当的手术概念,并有助于术前规划。