University of Lugano, Institute of Communication and Health, Via G. Buffi 13, 6904 Lugano, Switzerland.
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Nov;93(2):224-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.06.024. Epub 2013 Jul 29.
To design a measure of judgment skills (a dimension within the wider concept of health literacy) that assesses patient decisions with a scenario-based measure in the context of sleeping disorders; more specifically to provide a basis for the professional medical evaluation of patient decisions to be employed in the measure; and in a wider sense to explore in which way knowledge about insomnia, self-management and autonomous decision-making are affecting insomnia patients and their health outcomes.
A three-round Delphi-study was conducted with an expert panel of three sleep specialists and 26 general practitioners to rate scenarios of patient decision problems and find a consensus in ranking the answer options from a medical perspective.
A consensus emerged among the medical experts about the measure, which could be further improved with regard to the scenarios and the answer options. Scenarios were rated as realistic and the answer options ranked with a high agreement.
The 16 scenarios with four ranked answer options each provide a valid measure for patients' judgment skills within the wider concept of health literacy.
The proposed judgment skills measure is ready to be pre-tested with insomnia patients, and a validation study can be conducted.
设计一种判断技能衡量标准(健康素养更广泛概念中的一个维度),该标准通过基于情景的测量方法评估睡眠障碍患者的决策;更具体地说,为衡量标准中专业医疗评估患者决策提供依据;从更广泛的角度探讨关于失眠、自我管理和自主决策的知识如何影响失眠患者及其健康结果。
采用三轮德尔菲研究法,邀请三位睡眠专家和 26 名全科医生组成专家小组,对患者决策问题情景进行评分,并从医学角度寻找共识,对答案选项进行排序。
医学专家对该衡量标准达成共识,可进一步改进情景和答案选项。情景被评定为现实,答案选项的排序具有高度一致性。
16 个情景各有四个排序答案选项,为健康素养更广泛概念中的患者判断技能提供了有效的衡量标准。
拟议的判断技能衡量标准已准备好用于失眠患者的预测试,并可进行验证研究。