Paltrinieri Saverio, Ibba Fabrizio, Rossi Gabriele
Department of Veterinary Sciences and Public Health - University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
J Feline Med Surg. 2014 Feb;16(2):125-36. doi: 10.1177/1098612X13499337. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
Many feline breeds have been generated from a small number of ancestors. Thus, breed-specific peculiarities can be expected, which could include haematological and biochemical measurements. Despite this, there are only a few reports on breed-specific reference intervals (RI). This information is essential in routine practice where results from individual patients are usually compared with an RI. The aim was to compare haematological and biochemical data from clinically healthy Abyssinian, Holy Birman, Norwegian Forest and Siberian cats with published RIs to assess whether the published RIs are acceptable in these breeds. Comparison with established RIs using guidelines from the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards and the American Society of Veterinary Clinical Pathology, revealed a number of breed-related clinicopathological differences. New RIs were established, but in most cases the new RIs overlapped with published RIs, and the use of the breed-specific data would minimally affect the clinical interpretation of laboratory results. Important differences that could result in misinterpretation of laboratory results were as follows: microcytosis and high α2-globulin concentrations in Abyssinian cats; high serum creatinine, α2-globulin and glucose concentrations in Holy Birman cats; high serum alkaline phosphatase activity and calcium and phosphate concentration in Norwegian Forest cats; low β2-globulin and γ-globulin concentrations in Norwegian Forest and Siberian cats. Breed-specific RIs should be used for these analytes. In addition, care should be taken in interpreting clinicopathological data in purebred cats for which specific RIs have not been established.
许多猫的品种都是由少数祖先繁育而来的。因此,可以预期会有特定品种的特性,这可能包括血液学和生物化学指标。尽管如此,关于特定品种参考区间(RI)的报道却很少。在常规实践中,这一信息至关重要,因为个体患者的检测结果通常是与参考区间进行比较的。本研究旨在比较临床健康的阿比西尼亚猫、神圣缅甸猫、挪威森林猫和西伯利亚猫的血液学和生物化学数据与已发表的参考区间,以评估这些已发表的参考区间在这些品种中是否适用。按照美国国家临床实验室标准委员会和美国兽医临床病理学会的指南,将这些数据与既定的参考区间进行比较,发现了一些与品种相关的临床病理差异。建立了新的参考区间,但在大多数情况下,新的参考区间与已发表的参考区间重叠,使用特定品种的数据对实验室检测结果的临床解读影响极小。可能导致实验室检测结果误判的重要差异如下:阿比西尼亚猫存在小红细胞症和高α2球蛋白浓度;神圣缅甸猫存在高血清肌酐、α2球蛋白和葡萄糖浓度;挪威森林猫存在高血清碱性磷酸酶活性以及高钙和高磷浓度;挪威森林猫和西伯利亚猫存在低β2球蛋白和γ球蛋白浓度。对于这些分析物,应使用特定品种的参考区间。此外,在解释尚未建立特定参考区间的纯种猫的临床病理数据时应谨慎。