Suppr超能文献

≥60 岁和<60 岁非霍奇金淋巴瘤或多发性骨髓瘤患者中, upfront 培洛利昔+G-CSF 与安慰剂+G-CSF 动员 CD34(+)造血祖细胞的安全性和有效性。

Safety and efficacy of upfront plerixafor + G-CSF versus placebo + G-CSF for mobilization of CD34(+) hematopoietic progenitor cells in patients ≥60 and <60 years of age with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or multiple myeloma.

机构信息

Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

出版信息

Am J Hematol. 2013 Dec;88(12):1017-23. doi: 10.1002/ajh.23561. Epub 2013 Sep 9.

Abstract

The efficacy and safety of plerixafor + G-CSF in enhancing hematopoietic stem cell mobilization and collection has been demonstrated in two phase III studies involving patients with NHL or MM. In these pivotal studies, plerixafor + G-CSF significantly increased the proportion of patients achieving target stem cell yields, compared to placebo + G-CSF. In this analysis, we compare the efficacy and safety of plerixafor + G-CSF versus placebo + G-CSF in patients enrolled in the two phase III studies, stratified by age: ≥60 years of age and <60 years of age. The proportion of older patients who achieved target stem cell yields was significantly higher in the plerixafor group than in placebo group (NHL: 50.9 vs. 25.4%, P < 0.001; MM: 69.6 vs. 23.7%, P < 0.001). In this older cohort, the median times to neutrophil and to platelet engraftment following autologous stem cell transplant were comparable between the plerixafor and placebo groups. Similar efficacy findings were observed in the younger age group. The most common adverse events (all grades) reported among older patients in the plerixafor group included diarrhea (41.3%), nausea (38.9%), fatigue (30.2%), and injection-site reaction (29.4%). The frequency of adverse events was similar between the older and the younger age groups. Taken together, our subanalysis demonstrate that plerixafor + G-CSF can be safely and effectively used in adult patients of all ages, including those ≥60 years, to support optimal stem cell mobilization for autologous stem cell transplantation.

摘要

plerixafor + G-CSF 已在两项涉及 NHL 或 MM 患者的 III 期研究中证实了其增强造血干细胞动员和采集的疗效和安全性。在这些关键研究中,与安慰剂+G-CSF 相比,plerixafor+G-CSF 显著增加了达到目标干细胞产量的患者比例。在这项分析中,我们比较了在两项 III 期研究中入组的患者中,按年龄分层(≥60 岁和<60 岁)时,plerixafor+G-CSF 与安慰剂+G-CSF 的疗效和安全性。达到目标干细胞产量的老年患者比例在 plerixafor 组明显高于安慰剂组(NHL:50.9% vs. 25.4%,P<0.001;MM:69.6% vs. 23.7%,P<0.001)。在这个老年队列中,自体外周血干细胞移植后中性粒细胞和血小板植入的中位时间在 plerixafor 和安慰剂组之间相似。在年轻年龄组中观察到了类似的疗效结果。老年患者中 plerixafor 组报告的最常见(所有等级)不良事件包括腹泻(41.3%)、恶心(38.9%)、疲劳(30.2%)和注射部位反应(29.4%)。老年组和年轻年龄组之间不良事件的频率相似。总之,我们的亚分析表明,plerixafor+G-CSF 可安全有效地用于所有年龄段的成年患者,包括≥60 岁的患者,以支持自体干细胞移植的最佳干细胞动员。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97e0/4295654/1d9a19f2ac48/nihms-582695-f0001.jpg

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
Peripheral blood stem cell collection in elderly patients.老年患者的外周血干细胞采集
Ann Hematol. 2010 Mar;89(3):317-21. doi: 10.1007/s00277-009-0812-9. Epub 2009 Aug 20.
10
A gerontologic perspective on cancer and aging.关于癌症与衰老的老年学视角。
Cancer. 2008 Jun 1;112(11 Suppl):2569-76. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23444.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验