Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, , São Paulo; Brazil.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013 Nov 1;67(11):966-72. doi: 10.1136/jech-2013-202626. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
Test the original income inequality theory, by analysing its association with depression, anxiety and any mental disorders.
We analysed a sample of 3542 individuals aged 18 years and older selected through a stratified, multistage area probability sample of households from the São Paulo Metropolitan Area. Mental disorder symptoms were assessed using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) criteria. Bayesian multilevel logistic models were performed.
Living in areas with medium and high-income inequality was statistically associated with increased risk of depression, relative to low-inequality areas (OR 1.76; 95% CI 1.21 to 2.55, and 1.53; 95% CI 1.07 to 2.19, respectively). The same was not true for anxiety (OR 1.25; 95% CI 0.90 to 1.73, and OR 1.07; 95% CI 0.79 to 1.46). In the case of any mental disorder, results were mixed.
In general, our findings were consistent with the income inequality theory, that is, people living in places with higher income inequality had an overall higher odd of mental disorders, albeit not always statistically significant. The fact that depression, but not anxiety, was statistically significant could indicate a pathway by which inequality influences health.
通过分析其与抑郁、焦虑和任何精神障碍的关联,检验原始收入不平等理论。
我们分析了来自圣保罗大都市区通过分层、多阶段区域概率抽样的 3542 名 18 岁及以上个体的样本。使用《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》(DSM-IV)标准评估精神障碍症状。采用贝叶斯多层次逻辑回归模型进行分析。
与低不平等地区相比,生活在中高收入不平等地区与抑郁风险增加具有统计学关联(OR1.76;95%CI1.21 至 2.55,OR1.53;95%CI1.07 至 2.19)。对于焦虑,情况并非如此(OR1.25;95%CI0.90 至 1.73,OR1.07;95%CI0.79 至 1.46)。对于任何精神障碍,结果则不一致。
总的来说,我们的发现与收入不平等理论一致,即生活在收入不平等程度较高的地方的人总体上更有可能患上精神障碍,尽管并不总是具有统计学意义。焦虑无统计学意义,而抑郁有统计学意义,这表明不平等影响健康的途径。