• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同专业医生对高危前列腺癌辅助放疗推荐的差异。

Variation in treatment recommendations of adjuvant radiation therapy for high-risk prostate cancer by physician specialty.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Yale University, New Haven, CT.

出版信息

Urology. 2013 Oct;82(4):807-12. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.04.060. Epub 2013 Aug 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2013.04.060
PMID:23910088
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the treatment recommendations from a nationally representative sample of radiation oncologists and urologists on adjuvant radiotherapy for patients with pathologically advanced prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.

METHODS

From a random sample of 1422 physicians (n = 711 radiation oncologists; n = 711 urologists) in the American Medical Association Masterfile, a mail survey queried treatment recommendations for adjuvant radiotherapy that varied by the following pathologic features: extraprostatic extension (pT3a) vs seminal vesicle invasion (pT3b), Gleason 7 vs Gleason 8-10, and margin negative (MN) vs margin positive (MP). Pearson chi-square and multivariable logistic regression were used to test for differences in treatment recommendations by physician specialty.

RESULTS

Response rates for radiation oncologists and urologists were similar (44% vs 46%; P = .42). Radiation oncologists were more likely to recommend adjuvant radiotherapy than urologists for all the varying pathologic scenarios from pT3a, Gleason 7, and MN (42.5% vs 9.7%; adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 7.82, P <.001) to pT3b, Gleason 8-10, and MP disease (94.5% vs 89.1%, adjusted OR: 2.46, P <.001). Compared with radiation oncologists, urologists were more likely to recommend salvage radiotherapy pT3a, Gleason 7, and MN (90.3% vs 57.7%; adjusted OR: 7.72, P <.001) to pT3b, Gleason 8-10, and MP disease (10.9% vs 5.5%; adjusted OR: 2.22, P <.001).

CONCLUSION

In this national survey, radiation oncologists and urologists have markedly different treatment recommendations for adjuvant and salvage radiotherapy. Patients with adverse pathologic features after radical prostatectomy should consult with both a urologist and radiation oncologist to hear a diversity of opinions to make the most informed decision possible.

摘要

目的

评估来自全国代表性样本的放射肿瘤学家和泌尿科医生对根治性前列腺切除术后病理进展前列腺癌患者辅助放疗的治疗建议。

方法

从美国医学协会主文件中随机抽取 1422 名医生(n=711 名放射肿瘤学家;n=711 名泌尿科医生)的样本,通过邮件调查询问辅助放疗的治疗建议,这些建议因以下病理特征而异:前列腺外延伸(pT3a)与精囊侵犯(pT3b)、Gleason 7 与 Gleason 8-10、切缘阴性(MN)与切缘阳性(MP)。采用 Pearson 卡方检验和多变量逻辑回归检验医生专业之间治疗建议的差异。

结果

放射肿瘤学家和泌尿科医生的回复率相似(44%比 46%;P=0.42)。对于所有不同的病理情况,放射肿瘤学家比泌尿科医生更倾向于推荐辅助放疗,包括 pT3a、Gleason 7 和 MN(42.5%比 9.7%;调整后的优势比[OR]:7.82,P<.001)至 pT3b、Gleason 8-10 和 MP 疾病(94.5%比 89.1%,调整后的 OR:2.46,P<.001)。与放射肿瘤学家相比,泌尿科医生更倾向于推荐挽救性放疗 pT3a、Gleason 7 和 MN(90.3%比 57.7%;调整后的 OR:7.72,P<.001)至 pT3b、Gleason 8-10 和 MP 疾病(10.9%比 5.5%;调整后的 OR:2.22,P<.001)。

结论

在这项全国性调查中,放射肿瘤学家和泌尿科医生对辅助和挽救性放疗有明显不同的治疗建议。根治性前列腺切除术后病理不良的患者应咨询泌尿科医生和放射肿瘤学家,听取各种意见,以便做出最明智的决策。

相似文献

1
Variation in treatment recommendations of adjuvant radiation therapy for high-risk prostate cancer by physician specialty.不同专业医生对高危前列腺癌辅助放疗推荐的差异。
Urology. 2013 Oct;82(4):807-12. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.04.060. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
2
Specialty bias in treatment recommendations and quality of life among radiation oncologists and urologists for localized prostate cancer.放射肿瘤学家和泌尿科医生在局限性前列腺癌治疗建议和生活质量方面的专业偏见。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2014 Jun;17(2):163-9. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2014.3. Epub 2014 Feb 25.
3
Radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy: treatment recommendations differ between urologists and radiation oncologists.前列腺癌根治术后的放疗:泌尿外科医生和放疗肿瘤学家的治疗建议存在差异。
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 4;8(11):e79773. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079773. eCollection 2013.
4
Perceptions of Active Surveillance and Treatment Recommendations for Low-risk Prostate Cancer: Results from a National Survey of Radiation Oncologists and Urologists.主动监测低危前列腺癌的认知和治疗推荐:一项全国范围内调查放射肿瘤学家和泌尿科医师的结果。
Med Care. 2014 Jul;52(7):579-85. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000155.
5
Perceptions of radiation oncologists and urologists on sources and type of evidence to inform prostate cancer treatment decisions.放疗医师和泌尿科医师对告知前列腺癌治疗决策的证据来源和类型的看法。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Jun 1;89(2):277-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.02.001. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
6
Clinical implementation of quality of life instruments and prediction tools for localized prostate cancer: results from a national survey of radiation oncologists and urologists.局部前列腺癌生存质量评估工具和预测工具的临床应用:一项全国范围内对放射肿瘤学家和泌尿科医生的调查结果。
J Urol. 2013 Jun;189(6):2092-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.174. Epub 2012 Dec 3.
7
Improved biochemical outcome with adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer with poor pathologic features.对于具有不良病理特征的前列腺癌患者,根治性前列腺切除术后辅助放疗可改善生化结局。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Mar 1;61(3):714-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.06.018.
8
Knowledge, attitudes and beliefs towards management of men with locally advanced prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy: an Australian survey of urologists.对根治性前列腺切除术后局部晚期前列腺癌男性患者管理的知识、态度和信念:澳大利亚泌尿外科医生调查
BJU Int. 2016 Apr;117 Suppl 4:35-44. doi: 10.1111/bju.13037.
9
Impact of a Genomic Classifier of Metastatic Risk on Postprostatectomy Treatment Recommendations by Radiation Oncologists and Urologists.转移性风险基因组分类器对放射肿瘤学家和泌尿科医生前列腺切除术后治疗建议的影响。
Urology. 2015 Jul;86(1):35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.04.004.
10
Comparison of recommendations by urologists and radiation oncologists for treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer.泌尿外科医生和放射肿瘤学家对临床局限性前列腺癌治疗建议的比较。
JAMA. 2000 Jun 28;283(24):3217-22. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.24.3217.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of F-DCFPyL PET on changes in management of patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.F-DCFPyL正电子发射断层扫描对前列腺癌患者治疗管理变化的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Apr 25;11:1355236. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1355236. eCollection 2024.
2
Changing trends in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Inverse stage migration-A retrospective analysis.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的变化趋势:逆向分期迁移——一项回顾性分析。
Prostate Int. 2021 Sep;9(3):157-162. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2021.04.002. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
3
Factors associated with physicians' recommendations for managing low-risk papillary thyroid cancer.
与医生推荐低危型甲状腺乳头状癌管理方案相关的因素。
Am J Surg. 2021 Jul;222(1):111-118. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.11.021. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
4
Outcomes of pathologically localized high-grade prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy.根治性前列腺切除术治疗病理局限性高级别前列腺癌的结果
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Oct;98(42):e17627. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017627.
5
Postoperative biochemical recurrence of pathologically localized high-grade prostate cancer in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.辅助治疗初治的病理性局限性高级别前列腺癌患者的术后生化复发。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2020 Jan;146(1):221-227. doi: 10.1007/s00432-019-03049-0. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
6
A national survey of radiation oncologists and urologists on prediction tools and nomograms for localized prostate cancer.一项针对放射肿瘤学家和泌尿科医生的全国性调查,了解他们对局部前列腺癌预测工具和列线图的使用情况。
World J Urol. 2019 Oct;37(10):2099-2108. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02637-6. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
7
Predictors of adverse pathologic features after radical prostatectomy in low-risk prostate cancer.根治性前列腺切除术后低危前列腺癌不良病理特征的预测因素。
BMC Cancer. 2018 May 9;18(1):545. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4416-4.
8
Effect of Preoperative Risk Group Stratification on Oncologic Outcomes of Patients with Adverse Pathologic Findings at Radical Prostatectomy.术前风险分组分层对根治性前列腺切除术中病理结果不良患者肿瘤学结局的影响。
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 7;11(10):e0164497. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164497. eCollection 2016.
9
Decipher correlation patterns post prostatectomy: initial experience from 2 342 prospective patients.解析前列腺切除术后的相关性模式:2342 例前瞻性患者的初步经验。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2016 Dec;19(4):374-379. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2016.38. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
10
Using implementation science to improve urologic oncology care.运用实施科学改善泌尿肿瘤护理。
Urol Oncol. 2016 Sep;34(9):384-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.05.022. Epub 2016 Jul 9.